Crazy this keeps happening. Hopefully people won't riot and create chaos. Let the facts come out.
Once again, please look up qualitative vs quantitative. I listed the perceived issues, but did not make a qualitative assessment.You seriously do not have reading comprehension.
Again.
I get that yourr listing your perceived negative "issues". And no where did i say 99% think its an issue.
He, along with most likely you, along with certainly me and along with almost ALL(hence, the 99%) do it. Therefore, its a non issue.
go ahead, get your last argument arguing nothing that im saying. People that are crazy and/or stupid are usually the last to know it.
We? No. I haven't protested.Because that's what we do, isn't it?
Looks like President Obama is about to have his veto of suing Sudia Arabia over 911 overturned.
Crazy this keeps happening. Hopefully people won't riot and create chaos. Let the facts come out.
I wonder how many folks continually calling for Trump's tax info carry a flame for a US phone company that hides the majority of its money in off-shore money market accounts for the sole purpose of tax evasion...
Cramer's wake-up call for Donald Trump on NAFTA
"No one talks about the actual benefit that deals like NAFTA bring to American workers, namely cheaper products. Meanwhile, the average Mexican worker only receives about $3 per hour. The country has fewer worker and environmental protections. There is state provided healthcare, and very little absenteeism.
Shareholders want the companies to move to Mexico for an immediate earnings-per-share boost. More important for consumers, Mexico has kept the price of cars down because of its low costs, Cramer said.
"That is a real trade-off and we need to talk about it, rather than pretending it doesn't exist," he said. "
Only dingy harry Reid voted against it.Not much of a surprise. Wasn't the vote almost unanimous?
Is this some sort of a test/exercise for me to point out which sentence is more of a strawman defense? If the GOP puts forth a pork filled bill anything like the stimulus you can bet your blow up companion I will oppose.The point, dear heart, was that the GOP can't suddenly claim to be all hot for infrastructure. And your claim to be holier-than-thou sort of evaporates if your response is "you too".
Veto knowing that it would be overturned but still saves face with the Saudi's.Not much of a surprise. Wasn't the vote almost unanimous?
Given the tendency for the media to foment this type of shit, I'd say yeah actually.
I wish something like this would happen within a 30 mile drive of where I live. I could use an upgrade on my TV...
The democratic party is not what it was. It was at one time the working man's party but now it's the social justice party. It is more interested in appealing to angry black voters, illegal immigrants and transvestites. My vote for Trump is not a vote for him but a vote against a party that has said f*ck you to it's former base.
The ole "comply or die" strikes again. I find it pretty effed that our military has a protocol to follow when battling enemy combatants that include verbal warnings and warning shots, yet the 5.0 can open fire on any civilian they feel is a "threat" and then justify it later.
We need better police training. How about teaching them the ins and outs of mental illness and conflict de-escalation (use your inside voice some, man). But, nah. American police academies will continue to gloss over that silly stuff and spend most of their time on the shooting range.
Christ, you're stupid.I find it pretty effed that our military has a protocol to follow when battling enemy combatants that include verbal warnings and warning shots, yet the 5.0 can open fire on any civilian they feel is a "threat" and then justify it later.
man's gotta build a Presidential Library, or start a Foundation y'knowVeto knowing that it would be overturned but still saves face with the Saudi's.
I didn't even bother reading the post tbh. I knew it would be stupid.You could have just asked -tell me why you think Trump won the debate? But that is not what you want to know. That is not the objective of your post.
You apparently aren't aware of the cost of new pv arrays
Such nonsense. NAFTA was a disaster. All the jobs shipped overseas did not help working Americans. I can't believe this needs explained.Cramer's wake-up call for Donald Trump on NAFTA
"No one talks about the actual benefit that deals like NAFTA bring to American workers, namely cheaper products. Meanwhile, the average Mexican worker only receives about $3 per hour. The country has fewer worker and environmental protections. There is state provided healthcare, and very little absenteeism.
Shareholders want the companies to move to Mexico for an immediate earnings-per-share boost. More important for consumers, Mexico has kept the price of cars down because of its low costs, Cramer said.
"That is a real trade-off and we need to talk about it, rather than pretending it doesn't exist," he said. "
This. Very good points and pretty much how I saw the debate.Only she didn't kill him on facts, she and Holt got under his skin bringing up personal points as fact when he knew they were false.
Blumenthal is Hillarys close personal confidant, do you honestly he brought up the birthed issue without her consent?
Holt stated it as fact that Trump never said he was against going into Iraq before the war, Trump vehemently claimed he did, and Trump was right, think Holt correct that statement?
Trump owned her the first 30 minutes when talking about the economy, that's the most concerning topic for voters.
She was wrong about stop and frisk in NYC, murder went down drastically, and since it's been stopped the murder rate is rising again.
All she did was sing him a couple times, she didn't have a better handle on the topics.
Speaking of Harry Reid, am I the only one that thought the "exercise accident" was really from someone beating the living shit out of him?Only dingy harry Reid voted against it.
Well, besides a formal education, I would suggest google, as I have before in my last few posts. Once you can understand certain distinctions, it will make your arguments better.Please @-LEK- , enlighten me. I am too dumb to understand how the difference in qual/quan justifies your position of listing non issues.
If you dont, i will not have purpose as i obviously cant keep up. TIA
Trump beat her on the meaningful stuff, but Hillary beat him on dumb topics of the last 30-45 minutes.
Would it be dumb like someone thinking America was giving up control of the internet kind of dumb, or thinking the President has the power to tax and spend kind of dumb?I didn't even bother reading the post tbh. I knew it would be stupid.
But if it's a thoughtful meAsure to address needs neglected during the last eight years--Is this some sort of a test/exercise for me to point out which sentence is more of a strawman defense? If the GOP puts forth a pork filled bill anything like the stimulus you can bet your blow up companion I will oppose.
And you have no clue to what goes into supporting and maintaining an electrical grid.
Would it be dumb like someone thinking America was giving up control of the internet kind of dumb, or thinking the President has the power to tax and spend kind of dumb?
Trump has turned over tax returns for lawsuits and loans
"In Monday night's debate, Democrat Hillary Clinton cited documents unearthed by reporters to question whether Trump doesn't want to release his tax returns because he has paid little or no federal income taxes.
Trump's response? "That makes me smart," a comment he disavowed just minutes after the debate. Asked by reporters if he had admitted to not paying federal income taxes, Trump said, "I didn't say that at all."
The question is not his income. But what countries is his beholding to. He decries China for their trade policies and claims they invented global warming as a hoax yet from the previously linked Fortune article:
"In 1994 Trump’s 78-acre tract of land on New York’s Upper West Side near the Hudson River was saddled with debt. The Donald persuaded a group of Chinese investors to bail him out by purchasing the property–and its reported $250 million in liabilities–and keeping him on as a 30% limited partner."