Wall Street Journal is finally catching on. More media outlets to follow?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-deplorable-emails-1473981664
http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-deplorable-emails-1473981664
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Can we get a C&P? I'm not giving the WSJ a single Coke-soaked, sticky, corroded penny from my change cup.
seems like the current MSM/dem theory on the polls are that Hilldawg jumped out to such a huge massive tidal wave lead that many traditional liberal voters (youngsters primarily) then felt free to express their disappointment at getting Hilldawg rather than Bernie. This was done with indicating positive voting choices for Johnson or Stein.
BUT NOW that Trump is roaring back, those traditional dem voters will realize the danger and rather than waste their votes on 3rd (or 4th) party nonfactors, they will swing back home to reluctantly vote for her to prevent the even worst choice becoming Pres.
it is an interesting if not desperate theory. obviously Team Hilldawg had bought in on it completely, begging Sanders & Squaw Warren to more directly campaign for her this weekend & promising a speech on Mon specifically for the millennial slackers.
You will never see a Democrat on here or the media say something like this. They never criticize their own, just follow like the ignorant base the Democratic leaders want them to be. They never demand change in any way.
He killed both Fallon and Dr Oz. Liberals are seething hahah
*Trump should go hard and heavy at flipping Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Get out of the 50/50 states, pull Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania into play. It can be done, and it wouldn't be as hard as people think. Keep campaigning on protecting the American Workers, keep the focus on blue-collar jobs. Flip at least 2 of the 3 and he wins this election, and the states that are now 50/50 will move firmly to his side in the process with little campaigning.
*It's almost a certainty that there will be terrorist events leading up to the elections, and that will provide an opportunity for either candidate to step up by projecting their ability to lead, be strong, be decisive and make wise decisions in times of crisis. Trump has tremendous upside for that opportunity, I don't see Clinton being able to project strength like Trump . If Trump handles that opportunity as he should, tones down the arrogance and aggression while still exuding confidence and strength, he will win handily.
*It's almost a certainty that there will be terrorist events leading up to the elections, and that will provide an opportunity for either candidate to step up by projecting their ability to lead, be strong, be decisive and make wise decisions in times of crisis. Trump has tremendous upside for that opportunity, I don't see Clinton being able to project strength like Trump . If Trump handles that opportunity as he should, tones down the arrogance and aggression while still exuding confidence and strength, he will win handily.
Saw an ap headline yesterday which said Trump is no longer a birther, fwiw
And the beat goes on....
http://dailysignal.com/2016/09/15/obamas-absurd-double-standard-on-defense-spending/
Agree, but would add if he keeps nut jobs off the SCOTUS his term is a success.
Let's face it: the bar is set pretty low right now.
ANYBODY following Obama is likely to look pretty good.
Besides, doesn't he get 8 years to blame Obama for anything that goes wrong?
If they are trying to resurrect the birther stuff regarding a dude that is finishing an 8 year term as POTUS, a movement she technically started, an incredibly irrelevant issue in '16.......
....then they know. They know how bad it is. Their internals have got to be *devastating*.
....then they know. They know how bad it is. Their internals have got to be *devastating*.
Textbook Clinton....and it's been going on for years.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/travel-back-to-an-early-clinton-scandal-1473982077
"It showed what has now become the Clinton Scandal Ritual: lie, deny, revise, claim not to remember specifics, stall for time. When it passes, call the story “old news” full of questions that have already been answered. “As I’ve repeatedly said . . .”
http://www.wsj.com/articles/travel-back-to-an-early-clinton-scandal-1473982077
"It showed what has now become the Clinton Scandal Ritual: lie, deny, revise, claim not to remember specifics, stall for time. When it passes, call the story “old news” full of questions that have already been answered. “As I’ve repeatedly said . . .”
Here's the deal, people will give a free pass to a poll like Rasmussen or Gallop and then turn around and treat aggressive polls like USA Wide as outliers. But the point of polls is to get the data as accurate as possible, not to make sure you poll doesn't stick out from the rest. That's what makes the LA times poll so striking - their methodology doesn't go by the old status quo of weighing the respondents from a heavy democrat pool. It's more reality based. And USA Wide has been ahead of the curve the last 6 weeks because it detect trends in voter preferences and employs those trends into its methodology in a more timely manner than the competition.
Heavy smoker John Boehner joins tobacco company's board[URL='http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/15/investing/john-boehner-smoking-joins-tobacco-company/index.html']
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/15/investing/john-boehner-smoking-joins-tobacco-company/index.html
A real man of the people with years of experience in the industry.
[/URL]
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/15/investing/john-boehner-smoking-joins-tobacco-company/index.html
A real man of the people with years of experience in the industry.
. . . in sequence with media who will stand in front of the White House for nightly news shots and say crap like "the President just wants to get on with the business of managing the country" (their precise words, night after night, Lewinsky-impeachment et al).
I asked about the poll genuinely, I hadn't seen anything like those numbers anywhere. Thanks for the explanation, not sure if those numbers will bear fruit, but I'd have to agree thats the way they're trending currently.
"Make America Great Again (By Driving America Into the Ground and Starting Over)"
I see we are sneaking up on that elusive 400 electoral vote, FTS. Do you think trump's ceiling is 400 electorals? Or do you see the USA wide poll going beyond 400?
No one will ever get to 400 again, Willy. I expect the race to actually tighten more before all is said and done. IMO....
He reminds me of Kramer in the Seinfeld episode: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Abstinence
If Trump stops the importing of refugees, fixes the economy, and appoints good people to the Supreme Court, he will be one of the best presidents in modern time. If he just does those 3 things.
Why is this being discussed? Obama is done. Makes no difference where he was born now. Is the media that desperate?
Yes they are that desperate.
It is stupid that Trump had to denounce it, when the rumor was started by Hillary. Will they make her denounce it?
What ur your point? Buying and smoking cigs is legal. He is no longer in government, he is a private citizen. You are truly grasping at straws now.
Remember those people mocking Obama for going on late night shows, daytime shows etc. DT goes on late night and Dr freakin Oz. Oh the hypocrisy.
The Washington Post (not exactly a conservative newspaper) confirmed it a year ago that Hillary started it. Look it up yourself.
No. I doubt anybody gives a shit what a Republican or Democrat do after they are gone. I'm just glad they're gone.
We could post a link from MSNBC and you would not accept that source either, so it is a waste of time showing you anything Research it yourself. I remember it being used by her team in 08 during the primary. You refuse anything negative about any democrat, truly a lemming
It was at a he very least, her supporters. And do you seriously believe they did it without her support?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...hillary-clinton-started-the-birther-movement/
Here are the facts:
Here are the facts:
- More than a full year before anyone would hear of Orly Taitz, the Birther strategy was first laid out in the Penn memo.
- The “othering” foundation was built subliminally by the Clinton campaign itself.
- Democrats and Clinton campaign surrogates did the dirtiest of the dirty work: openly spread the Birther lies.
- Staffers in Hillary’s actual campaign used email to spread the lies among other Democrats (this was a Democrat primary after all — so that is the only well you needed to poison a month before a primary).
- The campaign released the turban photo.
- Hillary herself used 60 Minutes to further stoke these lies.
