POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I overheard something this morning that there have actually been 7 votes on/related to impeachment on the House floor since Dec 2017.
Per some other dude I heard this morning- Any articles not addressed by congress remain active until a new congress in seated. She (legally, b/c there really is no protocol or precedent here) can sit on it until January 2021, at which time it dies. However, I was unclear as to whether the Senate/SCOTUS actually need the articles to proceed.
Works for me too. I am just too lazy to do the work disproving knowing Dwayne or someone else will come through anyway.It's probably easier that way
Yes, took off like a rocket Nov. 9.
This is the beginning of a setup for Michael to come to the Dims rescue.
If this were about Trump, Media would have funeral procession on syandby.
The first vote for impeachment was Dec 6, 2017
Reason?
Advance impeachment for the high crime of disrespecting NFL anthem protests/protesters
Somber
Reason?
Advance impeachment for the high crime of disrespecting NFL anthem protests/protesters
Somber
LOL. I like you most of the time so I will refrain from tearing this post apart. Do better, Bill.
ETA - sorry, I can't help myself.
That high was in ****ing FEBRUARY of 2008, almost a full year before Obama took office. It was at 7900 the day he was inaugurated. Posts like this are why hardcore Trump acolytes drive me nuts.
Last edited:
Last edited:
Yup, it’s very cowardly to call out both republicans and democrats on their bullshit. If you don’t get down on all fours and lick the dirt off of Trumps shoes, you are a coward. Praise our lord and savior Donald J Trump. The second coming of Christ almighty.
Which part?
Regulations and high taxes are part of why economy struggled to recover.
"he stole a pride banner hanging at Ames United Church of Christ"
Man, you can't even light a Christian Church's flag on fire anymore? What is the world coming to?
Did not say that but, you come here blasting people who support Trump with your first post today and only those on the right and you expect civility? Hypocrite.
Hahahaha the democrats are led by an imbecile, that’s their party leader incoherently making stuff up because what they’re doing has no basis in law, congressional procedures, ethics or basic human integrity. I will say that Nancy succinctly embodied the democrats in that gem of an answer.
**** no. I think probation would have sufficed honestly. I gave up on trying to make sense of criminal sentences long ago.
I know. Can't wait to see what all these Antifa fools get for burning the US flag on video while the cops stood idly by...
LMAO you are stupid. it was 8800 the day Obama was elected, it was 8000 the day he took office, it was 20,000 the day he left office, it was 19,000 the day Trump was elected. If your not math inclined, which you are clearly not since you can't even read a graph, that is a 220% increase from election day to election day. that is 27% per year, higher rate than it is growing at under Trump.
https://www.macrotrends.net/2616/president-trump-stock-market-performance
Last edited:
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Bill isn’t stupid. He just loves Trump and hates Obama. Facts are meaningless to him.
Bahahahaah. I don’t twitter but this guy is hilarious.
Neither of you understand what Bill is saying.
well since you are a flaming idiot and canadian john needs some education as well....did you just start putting money in the market or 401k the day Hussein took office or did you have money in the market a year or two prior? If the latter is the case, then you lost a shitload of money during the selloff. So your gains during Muhammed's bitch dog presidency were mostly recouping your losses from the selloff. Moderate gains took place later on.
I am not blaming or crediting any president for any stock market fluxes, but if you have investments, you have to speak about highs and lows, not just gains from when one is elected to another. Any gains in Bummer's presidency didn't start to happen for any one who had been invested years prior till much later down the road. And it was a slow ass recovery from those losses.
The original post said he either lost money or was in neutral during the 8 years of Obama’s presidency. Period.
That’s a lie.
Are you sure it's not a good idea to use the ideas that gave us Detroit, Baltimore, and East St Louis?
I hear those are wonderful places lol
And it was of something that wasn't even a crime, even if it was true lol
Spending will be an issue from hereon, beyond the control of even the most fiscally conservative president. scotus Abolishing line item veto ensured that.
Now they throw 25 billion of pork into a 5 million dollar bill that funds the troops toilet paper and wail WHAT ABOUT THE TROOOOPS. Before with line item veto, they could strike the nonsense and sign the rest into law. Scotus said it had to be all or nothing. Since, spending is literally out of control with ridiculous pork tacked into everything that passes.
Another one of scotus greatest hits, along with private takings, aca, habeus for foreign combatants, etc etc.
Honest question. What's a cis man?
You aren’t reading my post, you’re reacting.
Recovering lost ground is not growing.
Has nothing to do with loving Trump, or hating Obama. It has to do with technicalities and reality.
Recovering lost market ground isn’t growing.
Mitch told Nancy that her impeachment articles were "constitutionally incoherent". In government speak he basically told Nancy her mother was a whore.
Liberal economics is you giving to me so that we can both be poor.
Similar threads
