It is plenty of evidence when the ONE witness is the accused. You've been doing pretty good, don't jump the shark and be a dumbass now.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Another officer in the Freddie Gray case found not guilty (0-4). This looks like malicious prosecution for political reasons by the MD attorney general. Riot coverage at 11:00.
http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2016/07/18/baltimore-officer-learns-fate-in-gray-case/
http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2016/07/18/baltimore-officer-learns-fate-in-gray-case/
Are you trying to be cute, or are you just stupid?
If you can't understand the difference between someone saying they like a candidate because both political establishments hate the candidate, and something like cancer, you should probably just pull the internet cord out of your computer and take a nap.
I read that article and noticed a glaring omission. Why was the race of the judge not disclosed? I thought race was the most important component of this entire fiasco. Anyway, here he is.
I don't want to offend anyone and say he's black, he may identify as a white woman for all I know.
No. I don't understand it. What something isn't is completely insufficient criterion for judgment. It sounds like another dog whistle. Something *wink* *wink* that we all are supposed to understand. Why be so shy about stating your reasons?
Copy > Paste
That will save you a lot of typing and accomplish the same end result.
Just noticed that Obama issued a pathetic begging opinion piece in the WSJ yesterday about his supreme pick left rotting on the bench, not to be given a single hearing much less an up & down vote
say, remember all the political experts in this thread from back in March who said what a collossal mistake it was for Mitch & senate GOP to not give Obama this slot? That it would doom the GOP in Nov? Even before that, would lead to massive nationwide protests & riots?
yeah, not exactly. best thing McConnell has done in years if not decades. As far as the American people are concerned Obama not getting to fill this slot has outraged them less than a popcorn fart.
say, remember all the political experts in this thread from back in March who said what a collossal mistake it was for Mitch & senate GOP to not give Obama this slot? That it would doom the GOP in Nov? Even before that, would lead to massive nationwide protests & riots?
yeah, not exactly. best thing McConnell has done in years if not decades. As far as the American people are concerned Obama not getting to fill this slot has outraged them less than a popcorn fart.
I made a mistake about you, I thought you had some common sense. Fool me once...
from 4 months ago when Obama nominated his supreme choice....lol
![[banana]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1682178.gif "banana [banana]")
UGH! Ok. Still it was a bad example. While one is always bad (cancer and TB) the other has the potential to be good. It solely depends on how many politicians on both sides realize how tired the american people have become with the 2 party system.
Excellent answer.
It's ridiculous. Funny though, they were all so pompous they thought Trump would never win. Now they won't live up to that agreement. And as you say, it's no wonder conservatives are fed up.
Nice non sequitur.
They still should've voted. The real risk hasn't been realized yet. If hillary wins, odds are we get a much worse nomination to the bench. That was the risk.
Never trumpers lose their case based on a "voice vote".. so they essentially got told to STFU
so a government official should never ever declare martial law? Anything goes all the time?
Cops not on duty are civilians. Net, you need to add the cop killing rate and the civilian killing rate together for cops' killing rate. Net, their job is highly dangerous.
Watching the RNC and the Never Trump is baffling. You want a candidate who couldn't even win their own party? You're content with just giving Hillary the White House? She's not losing in 2020 and we won't have the demographics to ever win another election considering what she will do with immigration.
Good.
These people kill me. It's the mentality that Ben Shapiro has right now. I'm a huge fan of him but he's #NeverTrump and thinks the right should just let Hillary have the White House and then try and run a real conservative in 2020. One, the right isn't winning with the demographics continuing to change and us being flooded with third world culture.
His thinking is that the Trump era would have a stigma attached to it like Bush. I'm saying we will flat out not have the people to win another election. It's not going to happen. Trump isn't ideal but if we can put a stop to illegal immigration and win some seats for the Supreme Court, that's already a successful presidency.
And politicians don't? If you had done half of what Hilary did, you would be jail right now. She is the Deoncratic nominee for POTUS.
You really think that Trump would have upheld his end of the bargain?
Hell, he was discussing a third party run if he didn't get the GOP nomination.
Kasich is like a majority of Americans that don't support candidates simply because of party affiliation.
I read that article and noticed a glaring omission. Why was the race of the judge not disclosed? I thought race was the most important component of this entire fiasco. Anyway, here he is.
I don't want to offend anyone and say he's black, he may identify as a white woman for all I know.
You do realize that the judge doesn't render the decision?
You know that...right?
Guilt or innocence is determined by a jury so the race of the judge is pretty meaningless. Do you know the makeup of the jury?
But he won't because he cannot. Stopping illegal immigration is akin to stopping the flow of illegal drugs. The likelihood of stopping either is the same.
fuzz77, post: 4854073, member: 11064"]
You do realize that the judge doesn't render the decision?
You know that...right?
Guilt or innocence is determined by a jury so the race of the judge is pretty meaningless. Do you know the makeup of the jury?
I think I might know a little more about it than you do.![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
You do realize that the judge doesn't render the decision?
You know that...right?
Guilt or innocence is determined by a jury so the race of the judge is pretty meaningless. Do you know the makeup of the jury?
I think I might know a little more about it than you do.
Fuzz, you are the typical liberal. You only know half the story and it's the half you don't understand.
Good grief, they opted for bench trials. Even your friend committing insurance fraud over an alleged $8k bicycle knew that...
Umm, I've used that exact case as an example of politicians benefiting from the same rules. So, thanks for reiterating my point!
In case Fuzz, who occasionally poses as a legal scholar (and allegedly also fails to pay his bets on occasion) doesn't understand the concept of a "bench trial", I will explain it to him. Fuzz, it's a trial in which the defendant elects to waive a jury and have his guilt or innocence (or, more precisely, lack of guilt) decided by the judge.
In this case, he did, for sure. There was no jury.
Sure I have, you're too dense to know it. There is no jury in the Freddie Gray case. It is being heard by the judge. The judge that I posted a picture of. Idiot.
It's baffling. I don't get it.
Looks like it's time for yet another account for fuzz after this lol
I read that article and noticed a glaring omission. Why was the race of the judge not disclosed? I thought race was the most important component of this entire fiasco. Anyway, here he is.
I don't want to offend anyone and say he's black, he may identify as a white woman for all I know.
Omarrrr Little ... my man. Good to see you off the streets of Baltimore. Made it to the big time.
Similar threads
