ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Where did he state that? Not his opinion, but where he was directed that in order for Ukraine to get the money they had to dig up dirt on Biden, or help Trumps campaign?
Mulvaney stated the truth, every bit of foreign aid we give is used for leverage. We don't give it out of the goodness of our heart.
Leverage cannot be in the form of political favors for a candidate. That violates campaign election laws.

Where did John Gotti order someone'e execution?
 
1) It was not a full transcript (per the call log it was a 30 minute call, the transcript is at most a 5 minute conversation.)
DATE, TIME AND PLACE: July 25, 2019, 9:03 - 9:33 a.m. EDT (copied directly from the transcript)

2) What is the "favor"?
3) Why is the Attorney General calling their people?
4) What is Giuliani's role and why is he talking to Zelenskyy's people?

We know the answers to the questions above by the conversations between the Ambassadors Taylor and Sondland? Surely you have seen their conversation.

Dude, the aid was approved in the 2019 federal budget in September, 2018 and yeah...Ukraine knew about it. It is public record. You could have gone and purchased a copy of the federal budget and find the line item in their yourself. The fact that you would even make that assertion proves you to be totally ignorant on the matter.

So you’re still trying to discredit what you read in the transcript.

The favor was looking into the servers whereabouts, reports it was in the Ukraine.

AG Barr would contact the Ukraine AG because there is an ongoing investigation into the start of the Russia investigation.

Giuliani is Trumps attorney.

The Taylor/Sondland convo where Sondland specifically states the President says no Quid Pro Quo under any circumstance?

The Ukrainian President has no idea the aid had been held up at the time of the call. The aid was never even brought up in the call.
 
Leverage cannot be in the form of political favors for a candidate. That violates campaign election laws.

Where did John Gotti order someone'e execution?

There is no mention of political favors at all, nor any aid discussed.
You’re assuming something that didn’t occur, surely you see this? I suspect you do, which is why you’re trying to discredit the transcript.
 
Should someone tell them the fire was caused by a downed power line and not the climate change boogeyman.


This could be a great learning moment for the libs. It won't be.

These wild fires are the direct result of THEIR OWN policies regarding the environment. Hey lefty, you wanted the forest to remain natural. Now you know what nature does. She's a cold hard bitch.
 
So you’re still trying to discredit what you read in the transcript.

The favor was looking into the servers whereabouts, reports it was in the Ukraine.

AG Barr would contact the Ukraine AG because there is an ongoing investigation into the start of the Russia investigation.

Giuliani is Trumps attorney.

The Taylor/Sondland convo where Sondland specifically states the President says no Quid Pro Quo under any circumstance?

The Ukrainian President has no idea the aid had been held up at the time of the call. The aid was never even brought up in the call.
Release the call. Not an altered transcript. Easy
 
Why, the transcript is the official record. There is no evidence that the transcript was altered in any way.
You’re never going to be satisfied, there was no quid pro quo in that call.

Ed molests kids. You think you are going to make sense to a child molesting Hitler? I admire your effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
75398146_2540698246148075_1065951165641916416_n.jpg
 
Why, the transcript is the official record. There is no evidence that the transcript was altered in any way.
You’re never going to be satisfied, there was no quid pro quo in that call.
Would you agre a written transcript and a spoken call can be totally different. The tone means something.
 
Would you agre a written transcript and a spoken call can be totally different. The tone means something.

The President of the United States released a transcript of a call he had with another state leader, and that isn’t good enough!?!?

You’re reaching
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdlUK.1
1) It was not a full transcript (per the call log it was a 30 minute call, the transcript is at most a 5 minute conversation.)
DATE, TIME AND PLACE: July 25, 2019, 9:03 - 9:33 a.m. EDT (copied directly from the transcript)

That's a hell of a conspiracy you have going. Do you have any proof to back it up. Any at all?

2) What is the "favor"?

Read the transcript. The favor had absolutely nothing to do with Biden or the '20 election. It was about Crowdstrike and an ongoing DOJ investigation into 2016 election meddling. The words "favor" and "Biden" are separated by 500+ words that Ds and the media are purposely having to omit to connect the two.

3) Why is the Attorney General calling their people?

Because there is an ongoing DOJ investigation into 2016 election meddling and there is credible evidence that implicates Ukrainian government officials.

4) What is Giuliani's role and why is he talking to Zelenskyy's people?

He is Trump's personal lawyer. He has every right to defend his client against false collusion accusations and seek to uncover exculpatory evidence.

We know the answers to the questions above by the conversations between the Ambassadors Taylor and Sondland? Surely you have seen their conversation.

No you don't. You don't know the answers to anything. You're lying and applying your own motive based on leaks and lies. It's Russia collusion all over again.

Their full transcripts haven't been released. All you know it was Schiff illegally leaked to the press. Rumor has it the narrative is folding under scrutiny and cross examination. There's a reason Schiff is keeping it secret and only selectively illegally leaking things.

Plus about the Sondland/Taylor text messages I think he specifically says verbatim "no quid pro quo".

Ukraine knew about it.

So the Ukrainian president/government is lying and helping Trump with a cover up? Another mighty fine conspiracy. Have any evidence to back that up? I mean that's pretty damning stuff. Surely you're not making it up.
 
Last edited:
Lexington Herald proving again that liberals don't treat anybody as bad as they do a black person who doesn't believe what they tell him or her to believe...

 
  • Like
Reactions: ymmot31
I disagree about his ardent supporters. We’re about t-minus 10 minutes from a certain someone quoting my post and saying “false.”

His jarring tendency to exaggerate, lie, and deny facts should make anyone suspicious. His base, at least it’s most hardcore section, encourages it because it “triggers the libs.”

Weird how a bunch of people who say “never trust politicians” are so comfortable with this guy at the helm.
Drumpf isn’t a politician you DA’s.
 
With early voting, absentee,etc, if you want till an hour before the polls close to go vote, you are too stupid to be voting. I vote early EVERY DAM YEAR, very little waiting. Poll closing times are announced many times, learn to follow the rules.
So if everyone goes 65 minutes before the polls close, they should close them an hour earlier?
 
Trump occasionally uses hyperbole in his delivery. Everybody knows it and nobody gives a f*ck except you socially inept TDS consumed idiots who spend your time picking apart every word he utters looking for strict technical accuracy. This inconsequential shit is the 10K or whatever number of "lies" you idiots constantly scream about.

He probably spoke with several people overseas about it, but you hear "all over the world" and want to conduct a GD poll of the planet to prove strict accuracy to what you want it to mean. You're a pathetic bunch. But that is the lib douchebag mentality.

The important thing is that he is raising awareness to issues. Often, issues you don't want raised, and that is hilarious!
you could have omitted the word “occasionally”.
 
"I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign," - Taylor

"The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo's of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelenskiy promised during his campaign." - Sondland
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT