Why doesn't Congress just declare goddam war in Syria if they want boots on the ground so bad?
Yea, he made the numbers up. DA.Can't trust a pill head.
I support Bernie and Warren definitely. First time we've had truly progressive politics in the conversation in decades. ..
So wc...if it were up to you we'd still be in Vietnam?
Curious to know if you can explain why we were there? What was our objective and what threat was Vietnam to the US? Was it worth your life or the lives of any US soldiers?
I guess you considered Nixon to be anti-American...or did you not follow the 1968 Presidential election? How about Trump? ...i mean I know you think Bill Clinton was but he and Trump were in the same boat when it came to this issue.
Once a war begins you pretty well lose control of when it ends...especially when it is on someone else's soil. The Vietnamese people had been at war for nearly 100 years not even counting their wars with China. They had been losing all of the "major battles" for the entirety of that time. They kept fighting and making the French, the Japanese, the Thai, the Chinese and Americans all continue to pay a price for occupying their land. Their history indicates that they would fight another 100 years. How many American lives was it worth? Winning wars is easy, winning peace...not so much. That is reality.
Hmmm...the amount that we currently spend on healthcare. Where do you think the $4.2T already being spent would go if her plan was implemented? Did you honestly think that everyone would get to pocket the premiums, co-pays, etc currently being spent?The staggering cost of Elizabeth Warren’s plans: $4.2 trillion per year.
Elizabeth Warren has a plan for everything. Some of those plans are expensive. With Warren emerging as a front-runner in the Democratic presidential contest, Yahoo Finance tallied the cost of her plans.
Altogether, the Massachusetts senator’s agenda would require $4.2 trillion per year in new federal spending, and a like amount in new taxes, if she paid for everything without issuing new debt. The federal government currently spends about $4.4 trillion per year, so Warren’s plans would nearly double federal spending.......
Adios señora.
Grab them by the pussy. LolThese Biden videos are insane. How can anyone vote for someone so disgusting
Pill heads are not trustworthyYea, he made the numbers up. DA.
Did he write false?And warrior-cat had #4. I wonder what took him so long.![]()
I'm just glad there is at least one semi-attractive female Democrat left in this country.
Many on this board dispute that very thing. Climate change is debated constantly here. Whether or not it’s happening and whether or not it’s man-made both. Not just what we should about it. The left and right are having a debate about the problem, not the solution.
** News Flash from the 'Hold them accountable' Department. **
China now burns more coal than all other countries combined: 1907m tonnes vs 1864m tonnes.
![]()
** News Flash from the 'Hold them accountable' Department. **
China now burns more coal than all other countries combined: 1907m tonnes vs 1864m tonnes.
![]()
I'm just glad there is at least one semi-attractive female Democrat left in this country.
I’d definitely buy her a drink. or two or three. whatever it took.
I'll take the aide over her any day of the week.
Gimme both.
So your saying you want to be involved in a trouple like Hill's husband was lol.
I do. You should too.Democrats seem to care more about the lives of the Kurds than the hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of babies murdered(aborted) per year in the US.
Bill, winning the peace means that the opposing forces give up the fight.You don't win the peace, that's how you get in situations like Syria, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany after WW1. A war isn't simply between two opposing military's, the civilian population's will to fight or oppose must also be broken. Trying to win the peace ends up costing more American soldiers lives than necessary.
War is awful and brutal, it should be the last resort. The point of it is for the enemy populace to fear you enough that the thought of opposing you isn't worth it. See Japan and Germany after WWII, the South after the civil War.
That means I hear both sides and if I want to check something, I do it. I don't just listen or watch one station. I get the short of it here.SMH
You get your news from this thread. Noted.
Let's see that chart displayed per capita.** News Flash from the 'Hold them accountable' Department. **
China now burns more coal than all other countries combined: 1907m tonnes vs 1864m tonnes.
![]()
Never said anything of the sort. Simply stated that we won the major battles and the politicians lost the war. Like normal, you lefties inject what you want into the post to twist it they way you want it to be. Sound familiar. Adam Schiff taught you well.So wc...if it were up to you we'd still be in Vietnam?
Curious to know if you can explain why we were there? What was our objective and what threat was Vietnam to the US? Was it worth your life or the lives of any US soldiers?
I guess you considered Nixon to be anti-American...or did you not follow the 1968 Presidential election? How about Trump? ...i mean I know you think Bill Clinton was but he and Trump were in the same boat when it came to this issue.
Once a war begins you pretty well lose control of when it ends...especially when it is on someone else's soil. The Vietnamese people had been at war for nearly 100 years not even counting their wars with China. They had been losing all of the "major battles" for the entirety of that time. They kept fighting and making the French, the Japanese, the Thai, the Chinese and Americans all continue to pay a price for occupying their land. Their history indicates that they would fight another 100 years. How many American lives was it worth? Winning wars is easy, winning peace...not so much. That is reality.
I guess it's no wonder you post like an idiot.That means I hear both sides and if I want to check something, I do it. I don't just listen or watch one station. I get the short of it here.