That’s crazy.
Millions of California citizens need to march somewhere and do something. We can’t keep losing states like this. America needs to make California great again, somehow.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
That’s crazy.
Millions of California citizens need to march somewhere and do something. We can’t keep losing states like this. America needs to make California great again, somehow.
Trump really needs to stop calling it a “perfect call.” Textbook lying-technique from a known bullshitter. Has he already called it “beautiful?”
***News Flash***
Mitt Romney is a RINO...
How utterly stupid is this guy? A John McCain wannabe..... Who in the heck wants to be like John McCain????
Mitt Romney is a RINO...
How utterly stupid is this guy? A John McCain wannabe..... Who in the heck wants to be like John McCain????
Lying? We’ve all read it.
At this point “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?”
3 years of Muh russia and now these dumbasses think they are going to impeach him over a perfect beautiful phone call.
Thanks for admitting you're uninformed on an issue and endeavoring to change that. I'll point you in the direction of solar output and Antarctic ice cores to answer the questions you posed here on climate change. Short answer is solar fluctuations do have an effect on the climate but solar output is actually decreasing currently. Temperatures continue to rise quickly due to increasing greenhouse gasses from human activity. Greenhouse gas levels (called such because they trap that solar heat in just like a greenhouse regulating the temperature) are much more closely tied to global temperatures as we can see from ice cores that give us 800,000 years of data. And yes the super rich and their massive carbon footprint are screwing the planet more than the rest of us. The 1% screw us on this issue just like they do on every other one.
Thanks for admitting you're uninformed on an issue and endeavoring to change that. I'll point you in the direction of solar output and Antarctic ice cores to answer the questions you posed here on climate change. Short answer is solar fluctuations do have an effect on the climate but solar output is actually decreasing currently. Temperatures continue to rise quickly due to increasing greenhouse gasses from human activity. Greenhouse gas levels (called such because they trap that solar heat in just like a greenhouse regulating the temperature) are much more closely tied to global temperatures as we can see from ice cores that give us 800,000 years of data. And yes the super rich and their massive carbon footprint are screwing the planet more than the rest of us. The 1% screw us on this issue just like they do on every other one.
Where is that graph from and what is the temp?
The one time I've been to Austin I saw an In-n-out and a whataburger right next to each other. But I was on my way back to the airport and were running late. Terrible.
Luckily my employer at the time paid for all of us to have all you can eat at Salt Lick 2 days before. 3 years later I think I'm still full
Part me of feels like this Tulsi/Hillary beef is mostly for publicity for Tulsi and Hillary.
Everything the democrats do is so fake so I wouldn't be surprised if this beef is fake too.
Everything the democrats do is so fake so I wouldn't be surprised if this beef is fake too.
800,000 years clinched it. Junk science. Garbage in garbage out.
I love the contrived data theory...
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
(Ask them to explain how and have a real good time.)Another one of those educated beyond their intelligence...
Raised 15 million, but the graphic is cash on hand. Which he 6.3 million. It really is odd they keep leaving him out.
Real simple....he is not in their plans. They are a targeted prejudiced regime...the democasocialcommunists. Bernie was the last but he has nowhere else to go. Seriously....
Don't worry about Syria guys. Pelosi and Schiff are gonna fix it
Wow, not sure Drumpf can survive this sick burn
Thanks for admitting you're uninformed on an issue and endeavoring to change that. I'll point you in the direction of solar output and Antarctic ice cores to answer the questions you posed here on climate change. Short answer is solar fluctuations do have an effect on the climate but solar output is actually decreasing currently. Temperatures continue to rise quickly due to increasing greenhouse gasses from human activity. Greenhouse gas levels (called such because they trap that solar heat in just like a greenhouse regulating the temperature) are much more closely tied to global temperatures as we can see from ice cores that give us 800,000 years of data. And yes the super rich and their massive carbon footprint are screwing the planet more than the rest of us. The 1% screw us on this issue just like they do on every other one.
140 years compared to 800,000 years. Those 140 years represent the record keeping we have.
Those 800,000 years include four glaciations. Those glaciations represent the coolest period on Earth since the snowball Earth in pre-Cambrian times.
What politician caused the Sangamon interglacial period to have a higher temperature than now? By the way there's an assumption made that temperature at the South Pole represents temperature across the planet. That is one big assumption.
Hrrruummph! Hrrruumph!. I did not hear you give the president a hrrruumph!
This graph illustrates it perfectly, thanks for posting it. 800,000 years of co2 and temperature correlation.140 years compared to 800,000 years. Those 140 years represent the record keeping we have.
Those 800,000 years include four glaciations. Those glaciations represent the coolest period on Earth since the snowball Earth in pre-Cambrian times.
What politician caused the Sangamon interglacial period to have a higher temperature than now? By the way there's an assumption made that temperature at the South Pole represents temperature across the planet. That is one big assumption.
You're his mom? Seen a doctor lately psycho? Now pEDo thinks he's someones mom. 420ho, Reel your boyfriend back in.
Last edited:
Carbon dioxide is not going to increase during glaciation. During the interglacial periods it will increase. Obviously humans have caused it to increase quite a bit more in the last 200 years.
Last edited:
False, it has not been determined that human activity has been the cause.
Thanks for admitting you're uninformed on an issue and endeavoring to change that. I'll point you in the direction of solar output and Antarctic ice cores to answer the questions you posed here on climate change. Short answer is solar fluctuations do have an effect on the climate but solar output is actually decreasing currently. Temperatures continue to rise quickly due to increasing greenhouse gasses from human activity. Greenhouse gas levels (called such because they trap that solar heat in just like a greenhouse regulating the temperature) are much more closely tied to global temperatures as we can see from ice cores that give us 800,000 years of data. And yes the super rich and their massive carbon footprint are screwing the planet more than the rest of us. The 1% screw us on this issue just like they do on every other one.
You have made that clear before, your post is how you really feel about them. I know from first hand experience.
How and where was temp measured between 1880 and now?
Is that global average, and if so what does that mean exactly? The temps in one portion of the globe have nothing to do with temps on another.
Temperature is not indicative of climate change. Temps in a city or near one will be higher than rural areas. Has nothing to do with climate, but it is a man made temperature increase. If the threat were real, all temps would be taken in rural locations to actually see if the climate was indeed changing or if the temps were induced by heat sinks.
The temps from ice cores go back 800,000 years. From Antarctica and Greenland, both sides of the globe.
Similar threads
