Cheating is their only chance. Think about that......
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Now Ghouliani is threatening to go after the state department for not backing his story. lmao. he's got texts to protect himself! so much entertainment.
It is not illegal to disclose that someone has potentially broken the law. The POTUS isn't immune to whistleblowers. Anybody and everybody that has a job that is in any way government connected knows this as we are required to certify that we know 1) We are REQUIRED to report any suspected violations of laws...failure to do so can result in disciplinary actions including dismissal and/or legal action... and 2) It is illegal for anyone to retaliate against whistleblowers.
Your ignorance of the law doesn't make someone else a liar.
It is? Who says? Truly and for sure?
Well....
Sorry, I don't except the premise....okay......
You'll have to explain how hiding something "prevents corruption"? Leaks aren't corruption, they expose it...and if you aren't doing anything wrong or illegal then there should be nothing to hide.
The whistle blower isn't the one who heard the conversation, or even read it. Someone told them, that didn't have the authority to do so. That is where the "spy" statement Trump made is referring to, the person that gave the info to someone not authorized to have it.
Your ignorance and hatred is shining brightly, you don't realize or care what those actions will cause.
Leakers releasing confidential info is illegal, that is the only crime here.
Fuzz doesn't care about law-breaking as long as it hurts Trump. Or if it is a dem doing it.
He doesn't care about Fast/Furious (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about IRS targeting (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about secret tarmac meeting (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about spying on journalists (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about setting up an illegal private server to avoid FOIA requests (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about classified info being found on a private server and on others’ servers (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about destroying subpoenaed evidence (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about a SoS getting tens of millions of dollars laundered through a foundation in a pay for play scheme (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about illegal political espionage started by a political opponent paying for fake foreign intel (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care that a dem President used the entire IC against a political opponent (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about illegal leaking (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about a drug addicted son of a VP making millions of dollars sitting on a board of a foreign company he has no experience with (unless a republican had done it)
BUT - he does care that trump once joked about Russia finding Hillary’s 33,000 illegally deleted emails.
AND - he cares about Trump having a benign phone call with the leader of a foreign ally asking for cooperation with a US investigation.
F*ck fuzz and his hypocritical ideology.
He doesn't care about Fast/Furious (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about IRS targeting (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about secret tarmac meeting (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about spying on journalists (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about setting up an illegal private server to avoid FOIA requests (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about classified info being found on a private server and on others’ servers (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about destroying subpoenaed evidence (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about a SoS getting tens of millions of dollars laundered through a foundation in a pay for play scheme (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn't care about illegal political espionage started by a political opponent paying for fake foreign intel (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care that a dem President used the entire IC against a political opponent (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about illegal leaking (unless a republican had done it)
He doesn’t care about a drug addicted son of a VP making millions of dollars sitting on a board of a foreign company he has no experience with (unless a republican had done it)
BUT - he does care that trump once joked about Russia finding Hillary’s 33,000 illegally deleted emails.
AND - he cares about Trump having a benign phone call with the leader of a foreign ally asking for cooperation with a US investigation.
F*ck fuzz and his hypocritical ideology.
Last edited:
This is a hail Mary as I stated before, they know the’ve Lost already; America isn’t gullible enough (yet) to accept communism-lite and the argument for impeachment lacks any substance whatsoever.
I watched Pelosi live at whatever liberal chit tank she was speaking to and that chit show yesterday and I’m done, don’t need to keep up with this at all it will just blow over as another failed coup attempt in the end.
I'm sure you were fine with wikileaks leaking about Hillary too, right?
Meh, he’s a little smarter than these other leftists but still not smart enough to realize how bad of an argument he’s making. What it shows you is how effective blinding ideology can be, at least he’s still around all the other liberals left after the election are too shy to show their face for how wrong they were.
Which is a shame really, now we just have deluded leftists with incessant juvenile edstein posts
This tweet is really something special coming from a guy who owns three f*****g homes.
You can find criticisms of DT from me on this board, there is nothing but whoredom for HRC to be found from you. Has DT or his team been shown to destroy probable evidence after a subpoena?
Being under oath sure didn’t stop her husband from lying. Something tells me she is no different.
Poor mentally handicapped Trump doesn't know what a hyphen is and "discribing" while ranting about spelling. stable genius right there
He likes boys with no tans so...you hot that no tan thing in common.
If Trump is going to get impeached, can he have Schiff lined up and shot first? Throw in Hillary for good measure?
Trump is not going to get Impeached, but if he did, I wonder what really happens in its aftermath. I can see a lot of fed up folks take matters into their own hands.
Remember her most memorable statement in that "testimony" was "what difference does it make". She is a scumbag and rq adores her.
Last edited:
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
And I’d say that was also her take under oath about any issue.
The next trick for Adam Schiff will be to contact SNL to get Alec Baldwin to read his (Schiff's) version of the transcript as Trump. When that happens, Platnidumb and Jameslie would at the same time scream "Armageddon!" as they both simultaneously release their gerbils.
The Dems would be wise to take heed of the path they're leading the nation down. Clearly using impeachment as a political tool to try and defeat a President is dangerous.
Hillary anyone? Trump hid nothing and did nothing wrong so...
yea 5 rednecks will swing their AR's around, get mowed down by cops, then back to business as usual.
Thanks for acknowledging that you are all in favor of the Govt killing citizens as long as they are opposing democrats.
So the "leaker" should have also been a whistleblower since they too were concerned with Trump's actions. Would you in fact feel better if they were in fact one and the same?
As a citizen you have a moral obligation to report suspected crimes. It doesn't matter who committed them. It's the responsibility of the authorities...in this case Congress to investigate and determine if an actual crime was committed.
You don't get to make the rules as the rules have already been established. A spy's information is only damaging if it in fact is damaging information. You can't label everything "confidential" as a public official...you don't seem to be able to grasp that fact. Why do you think the Freedom of Information Act exists?
One only needs to look at the unprecedented number of people that have resigned from various jobs and positions in the WH to know that there are many "uncomfortable" with Trump's methods.
Let me ask Bill. Is there a line that could be crossed where you agree it would be right of someone within the WH to report it? That whistleblowing would be justified??? If so, what is that line?
Majority of cops and military are conservative. You'd be mowed down in seconds little man
Similar threads
