ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
And of course the activist media is irate the real story is being covered by some.




“Have we really learned nothing”

Not knowing who she was, I assumed that had to mean, “have we really learned nothing about drumming up fake news about Trump when the Dems are always the ones actually committing the wrongdoing we accused him of.”

But no, apparently they’ve learned nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DwayneMeighan
The Whistleblower May Not Be A Whistleblower At All

Despite the paucity of facts, some reasonable observations and conclusions can be drawn:

1. It appears that an American spy in one of our intelligence agencies may have been spying on our own president. The complaint suggests that this intel agent was secretly listening in on Trump’s conversation with a foreign leader. Was this person officially asked to listen to the conversation or was he or she secretly listening in? We don’t know.

2. This agent, who is an unelected and inferior federal employee in the government hierarchy, apparently believes that it is his/her job to second-guess the motivation behind the words of the elected president, who is the most superior officer in the U.S. government.

3. Article II of the Constitution gives the president sweeping power to conduct foreign affairs, negotiate with leaders of other nations, make demands or offer promises. The Constitution does not grant the power of review, approval or disapproval to spies or other unelected officials in the executive branch.

4. The ICWPA law defines the parameters of an “urgent concern” complaint as an abuse or violation of law “relating to the funding, administration, or operations of an intelligence activity involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” The president’s conversation with a foreign leader does not seem to fall under this whistleblower definition.

5. It appears the acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) agrees with this assessment. His agency’s general counsel wrote a letter stating the complaint did not meet the ICWPA definition because it involved conduct “from someone outside the intel community and did not relate to intelligence activity”, according to a report by Fox News. This is why the DNI refused to forward the complaint to congress.

To put this in plain language, a spy who allegedly spied on the president does not have a legitimate whistleblower complaint against that president under the law. The ICWPA is a mechanism to report alleged misconduct by members within the intelligence community, of which the president is not. Yes, the alphabet soup of intel agencies ultimately report to the president, but that does not make Trump a member of that community and subject to its rules of conduct.

So, it turns out that the “whistleblower” may not be a whistleblower at all. But you will not hear that from the mainstream media. They are too busy lighting their own hair on fire.
 
The Whistleblower May Not Be A Whistleblower At All

Despite the paucity of facts, some reasonable observations and conclusions can be drawn:

1. It appears that an American spy in one of our intelligence agencies may have been spying on our own president. The complaint suggests that this intel agent was secretly listening in on Trump’s conversation with a foreign leader. Was this person officially asked to listen to the conversation or was he or she secretly listening in? We don’t know.

2. This agent, who is an unelected and inferior federal employee in the government hierarchy, apparently believes that it is his/her job to second-guess the motivation behind the words of the elected president, who is the most superior officer in the U.S. government.

3. Article II of the Constitution gives the president sweeping power to conduct foreign affairs, negotiate with leaders of other nations, make demands or offer promises. The Constitution does not grant the power of review, approval or disapproval to spies or other unelected officials in the executive branch.

4. The ICWPA law defines the parameters of an “urgent concern” complaint as an abuse or violation of law “relating to the funding, administration, or operations of an intelligence activity involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” The president’s conversation with a foreign leader does not seem to fall under this whistleblower definition.

5. It appears the acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) agrees with this assessment. His agency’s general counsel wrote a letter stating the complaint did not meet the ICWPA definition because it involved conduct “from someone outside the intel community and did not relate to intelligence activity”, according to a report by Fox News. This is why the DNI refused to forward the complaint to congress.

To put this in plain language, a spy who allegedly spied on the president does not have a legitimate whistleblower complaint against that president under the law. The ICWPA is a mechanism to report alleged misconduct by members within the intelligence community, of which the president is not. Yes, the alphabet soup of intel agencies ultimately report to the president, but that does not make Trump a member of that community and subject to its rules of conduct.

So, it turns out that the “whistleblower” may not be a whistleblower at all. But you will not hear that from the mainstream media. They are too busy lighting their own hair on fire.


BuT THe WhiSTLeBlOweR hAS NOthIng To GAiN!!!!
 
So I see the Dems have already picked Joe Biden as the guy they’re going to rig the election for. Wasn’t aware Trump was running against Biden in anything at this point.

You could tell last week or two all the strings were being pulled. Msm and blue checks all started getting on message.

After this, looks no doubt he's their man.

The Whistleblower May Not Be A Whistleblower At All

Despite the paucity of facts, some reasonable observations and conclusions can be drawn:

1. It appears that an American spy in one of our intelligence agencies may have been spying on our own president. The complaint suggests that this intel agent was secretly listening in on Trump’s conversation with a foreign leader. Was this person officially asked to listen to the conversation or was he or she secretly listening in? We don’t know.

2. This agent, who is an unelected and inferior federal employee in the government hierarchy, apparently believes that it is his/her job to second-guess the motivation behind the words of the elected president, who is the most superior officer in the U.S. government.

3. Article II of the Constitution gives the president sweeping power to conduct foreign affairs, negotiate with leaders of other nations, make demands or offer promises. The Constitution does not grant the power of review, approval or disapproval to spies or other unelected officials in the executive branch.

4. The ICWPA law defines the parameters of an “urgent concern” complaint as an abuse or violation of law “relating to the funding, administration, or operations of an intelligence activity involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” The president’s conversation with a foreign leader does not seem to fall under this whistleblower definition.

5. It appears the acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) agrees with this assessment. His agency’s general counsel wrote a letter stating the complaint did not meet the ICWPA definition because it involved conduct “from someone outside the intel community and did not relate to intelligence activity”, according to a report by Fox News. This is why the DNI refused to forward the complaint to congress.

To put this in plain language, a spy who allegedly spied on the president does not have a legitimate whistleblower complaint against that president under the law. The ICWPA is a mechanism to report alleged misconduct by members within the intelligence community, of which the president is not. Yes, the alphabet soup of intel agencies ultimately report to the president, but that does not make Trump a member of that community and subject to its rules of conduct.

So, it turns out that the “whistleblower” may not be a whistleblower at all. But you will not hear that from the mainstream media. They are too busy lighting their own hair on fire.

Another story made it sound like it all generated from someone who didn't even hear the convo. Imagine filing an allegations like THIS based on second or third hand accounts of people that maybe didn't even hear the conversation.

Lol my bad. It's the same people who ran the collusion nonsense forever
 
:sunglasses:

70459463_2503505309867369_3349483275746803712_n.jpg
 
The ice age ended bc sabertooth tigers didnt become vegan and wooly mammoths refused to drive electric cars.

"Give us all your money and power or else you'll die."

Doesnt sound like a doomsday cult at all...

This anti-beef thing is completely wrong.

Cattle are able to convert very poor soils into very productive energy for humans. You can get far more energy off of those marginal areas raising cattle than you could if you tried to raise vegetable crops. The erosion in the latter would be far greater. The sites would become completely unproductive. However, you can raise beef on these areas without them eroding away. The climate folks never seem to comment on that. Mainly because they don't know what the f*** they're talkin about.
 
Last edited:
Obviously professional sports are an example of capitalism for the owners, coaches, and players.

I’m wondering why so many people refer to them as “privileged athletes.”
Getting paid to play a game. Most owners worked and built their business. No wonder you suck so bad, you don't know what working is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC
They put on their pants just like we do. You spend time in a thread where working-class individuals bitch and moan about politics 24/7, and their opinions don’t seem to bother you.

Why do athletes’ political/societal opinions offend you so much?

Why do you hate Nick Bosa for being team #MAGA and letting people know about it? I feel like everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If you let their opinion sway yours, that’s a personal issue.
You don't, you wear jeggings and cootchie shorts.
 
The Whistleblower May Not Be A Whistleblower At All

Despite the paucity of facts, some reasonable observations and conclusions can be drawn:

1. It appears that an American spy in one of our intelligence agencies may have been spying on our own president. The complaint suggests that this intel agent was secretly listening in on Trump’s conversation with a foreign leader. Was this person officially asked to listen to the conversation or was he or she secretly listening in? We don’t know.

2. This agent, who is an unelected and inferior federal employee in the government hierarchy, apparently believes that it is his/her job to second-guess the motivation behind the words of the elected president, who is the most superior officer in the U.S. government.

3. Article II of the Constitution gives the president sweeping power to conduct foreign affairs, negotiate with leaders of other nations, make demands or offer promises. The Constitution does not grant the power of review, approval or disapproval to spies or other unelected officials in the executive branch.

4. The ICWPA law defines the parameters of an “urgent concern” complaint as an abuse or violation of law “relating to the funding, administration, or operations of an intelligence activity involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” The president’s conversation with a foreign leader does not seem to fall under this whistleblower definition.

5. It appears the acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) agrees with this assessment. His agency’s general counsel wrote a letter stating the complaint did not meet the ICWPA definition because it involved conduct “from someone outside the intel community and did not relate to intelligence activity”, according to a report by Fox News. This is why the DNI refused to forward the complaint to congress.

To put this in plain language, a spy who allegedly spied on the president does not have a legitimate whistleblower complaint against that president under the law. The ICWPA is a mechanism to report alleged misconduct by members within the intelligence community, of which the president is not. Yes, the alphabet soup of intel agencies ultimately report to the president, but that does not make Trump a member of that community and subject to its rules of conduct.

So, it turns out that the “whistleblower” may not be a whistleblower at all. But you will not hear that from the mainstream media. They are too busy lighting their own hair on fire.
Plus, I don't have a problem with him asking for the leader of that country to look into the dealings of Biden's son. There seems to be some illegal goings on and the president is sworn to protect this nation. Problems is, the left must think what Hunter did was illegal and they are trying to deflect by making it look like Trump is doing some wrong which, he is not.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT