ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .


EDuoPiHXUAUNhCo.jpg
 
72% of the world carbon emission comes from electricity and industry. 50% of US carbon emission comes from electricity and industry. If the Dems really only cared about curbing carbon emission, there is an easy solution that could do this. Nuclear is an emission free solution to this that could match the power output needed. With new technology the vast majority of nuclear waste is actually reusable.

I would respect a Dems climate change proposal a lot more if they included nuclear or at the very minimum be open to the option of nuclear. Instead of the go to answer for every Dem when it comes to nuclear and it being an automatic no and not just no to building more nuclear, but making sure we end and take down all current nuclear power plants.
Nuclear also comes with inherent risks...or didn't you know?
That said, I've personally have no issues with nuclear...

As they say, necessity is the mother of invention. If it is possible to power our nation's grid...the world's grid with solar, wind, geothermal and other clean sources of energy then why shouldn't we pursue them?
The sun alone delivers more energy to earth in an hour than the total worldwide usage of fossil fuels in a year. If the potential exists to make fossil fuels obsolete, why shouldn't we pursue that potential?
 
That's the debt not the deficit. Can you imagine if we were running a 20 trillion dollar deficit?


Duhhh. Big miss on my part. In my defense, when he said “ballooned” it immediately made me think of something Trump increased, not something he hasn’t even been close to Obama on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
Nuclear also comes with inherent risks...or didn't you know?

Those risks are amplified when your socialist government forces you to cut corners in production and maintenance... otherwise they can be all but eliminated.



As they say, necessity is the mother of invention. If it is possible to power our nation's grid...the world's grid with solar, wind, geothermal and other clean sources of energy then why shouldn't we pursue them?

If it's possible, then the free market can pursue it and make a profit without the government picking winners and losers in a wasteful, incompetent and corrupt vision what is best.

And that's what's happenin' already.

The sun alone delivers more energy to earth in an hour than the total worldwide usage of fossil fuels in a year. If the potential exists to make fossil fuels obsolete, why shouldn't we pursue that potential?

It's probably closer to a minute would equal the entire usage of mankind, past present and future. The reason why we shouldn't just blindly pursue what you leftists deem as potential because you never have a damn clue what you are talking about; blindly agreeing with your Al Gore overlords doesn't mean you know science. You just want to feel good about yourselves and better than other people, which you aren't.

An example of this is electric cars, you don't care, if you even know, that the amount of energy it takes to make the electric motor, the very toxic batteries and rare earth minerals mined and carbon footprint added by using coal sourced electricity entirely negates your green vehicle from being green... which will break down sooner and you'll need to buy a new one sooner thereby doubling up on that footprint, but hey you feel good about yourself for making a difference!

Hey, will just institute a buypack program! Great, money to the government and you can die in your delusions blissfully unaware while at the sleep at the wheel of your self driving car as the battery explodes (because that's what batteries do, it's what they want to do by the physics of a capacitor).

The reality is, as almost is always the case in your leftist delusions, is that you don't see further than your own noses; your proposed solutions have unintended consequences which just make things worse for everyone else, yourselves included.
 
Nuclear also comes with inherent risks...or didn't you know?
That said, I've personally have no issues with nuclear...

As they say, necessity is the mother of invention. If it is possible to power our nation's grid...the world's grid with solar, wind, geothermal and other clean sources of energy then why shouldn't we pursue them?
The sun alone delivers more energy to earth in an hour than the total worldwide usage of fossil fuels in a year. If the potential exists to make fossil fuels obsolete, why shouldn't we pursue that potential?

Umm because it's not you moron
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
You equated Trumps adultrey to Omar. Trump is not Muslim, Christians do not behead for that. I am sure you would love to see Kathy Griffin holding the real thing.
Adultrey is adultry. Christian trump should know that. It's one of the big 10.
 
Dumb ass does not realize the amount of land and natural resources it would take and how many humans would lose their lives for the cause. Incredibly stupid take and no real thought process or plan to see what could happen.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT