Alex Jones is a jackass, but so is Hamas and they still have a Twitter account.Yep. Poor Alex Jones - and of course the rest of us too.
Alex Jones is a jackass, but so is Hamas and they still have a Twitter account.Yep. Poor Alex Jones - and of course the rest of us too.
That destroys Barry the Kenyan's excuse for blaming W for his first 6 years in office..Using Graf’s logic on it taking 18-24 months for policies to take effect it seems Bush pulled the US out of the Great Recession.
That's the funny thing about you uneducated folk. You assume because someone disagrees with you they must align with a different ideology. That's the only way your feeble minds can process it. Too amusing.
When did I downplay the black voter block? I said inbred, that should automatically tell you it's white people I'm talking about.
You just lost all credibility using the NYT as your source...This is just factually untrue. If you were buying a business, do you pick the one struggling and on the brink of foreclosure, or the one thriving? Do you pick an injured, wounded player, or the best healthiest option available? That is literally the dumbest thing you have said and maybe the dumbest thing in this post. And their have been a lot dumb things. That was ideal for Trump, he could continue the improvement and take all the credit? Wish he has done. How do you think he would have done navigating the economic crisis with all his personal crisis and a war?
Trumps been in office 19 months. We are getting to the point his policies should start having real effect. If the economy starts tanking it probably is related to his administrations policies. Why wouldn't he get the blame? How is that ignorant? Just maintain and you'll look great. Make improvements and you'll look even better. Even if it's somewhat fake. Obviously his supports don't worry or care about that.
Now you're just talking the conspiracy theorist, faux news bullshit that I can't even take serious. Provide some actual evidence of this. Obama's numbers were as real and accurate as every president that's been tracked. Trying to manipulate the argument with lies and miscalculated numbers and data to support your argument just ins't going to cut it man. Even the smart and honest republicans and moderated will openly admit that. You come across as a Kelly Anne or Sarah Sanders lap-dog when you do that.
How is job quality better? Outside of a few industries, several are hurting and potentially facing lay-offs because of the tariffs. The auto industry that Obama administration saved, will likely be impacted, again. That's big in the rust belt as well. Speaking of which. How do you feel about Trump continuing to outsource for his company and requesting and receiving aliens to work on his properties annually, particularly his golf courses and hotels? Do you feel that help America? Manufacturing didn't tank under Obama, but again, if you read the articles I posted, you would know that is just Conservative fodder and faux news. Nafta is being renamed, woo-hoo, that was an accomplishment. He is now considering re-entering the TPP. We can't compete when we continually allow jobs to be sent overseas, and give those same big corporations tax breaks to give their execs, board members and shareholders. It's been proven time and time again, very minimal, if any, actually gets trickled down to employees and their families. You want to fix it, tax the shit out of any company that outsources jobs overseas. Tax them per dollar per job. That shit will change real quick. Give corporations the option, they can pay American workers, or they can pay America's taxes. Tax churches, especially the mega churches and any involved in politics in any way. We'd make billions there alone.
Why are all these primaries so close if they are staying with him? I mean, we are talking places he won in wide margins. So, why are the races considered toss-ups or leaning the opposite way of they are staying with him. Wasn't Conor Lamb from PA, which would be the rust belt, no? Even a lot of the southern races are toss-ups and that's a big red flag. NYT put out an article today with Amy McGrath 2 pts from Barr in the KY house race. That's a state Trump won with ease. Why the struggle?
I agree natural gas is up, and higher currently than renewable's. I gave you a graph showing it. However, renewable energy has grown at a much higher and faster level and created a lot more jobs. And that is projected to continue. Which was part of the original point of this argument you seem to want to get away from. Why do you support lying to the coal industry and coal workers for votes? You know coal is dying and not coming back. Why don't we replace those jobs instead of lying and say the are bringing them back? Drop rates for user? My bill is up over this time last year with less use. Most people around me are getting are dealing with the same issues.
Solar is hugely in demand right now. Do you not have all the solar farms going up where you are at? I've seen ton's. A lot of people here have them on their homes as well. Obviously they have electric or gas as well, but they are relying more and more on solar. Especially in attempt to reduce cost, since the companies sure as hell aren't as you falsely claim. We'll take sources for $500, Alex.
Where are you getting this? You do know the FED rate was raised under Obama, right? See here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/business/economy/fed-rates-powell.html
And the fads raise rates to slow down the growth of the economy and in instances, preclude a recession. Why did we want to slow down the economy for most of Obama's terms when we were recovering from the biggest recession ever? In 2015 they began to raise it. Here's a graph. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/business/economy/fed-rates-powell.html
Lol, I'm a socialist now? That's a new one. Well people in reality are still waiting for the trickle down. You must be one of the ones staring the trickling.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and assume that you are a Caucasian male? If so and you would like to see real racism, dress as nicely as you can,put on the finest jewelry you have and take a trip to the south side of Chicago tonight around lets say 11:00 pm..take a leisurely stroll for a while and share your views with the local folk..That would be a great time for you to express your sincere apologies for what "mean ole whitey" did back in the 50's and 60's..and please don't forget to report back as we will all be anxiously waiting your response.Blacks people we're oppressed greatly by their white counter parts until the mid 60's on a national scale, and even longer on a state scale. Racism still exist today for god's sack. Which would be evidence that some oppression still exist. Whether you want to admit it or not is completely your call. A good amount of people doubt the Holocaust, however; historical facts tell another story.
Democrats did not feast off black people or solely depend on their vote. The black vote has always been undependable because of lower involvement and turn out. Some of this can be attributed to lower education standards and availability. White people have been entitled to and received a free education of a somewhat decent quality. Particularly in that time period. Obviously you elected not to take advantage of that. Also, it's in part because even to this day, their is still obvious discrimination and oppression in voting. Conservatives are all about redistricting the black vote or making it harder for the them to vote period. Many Democrats have long worked to improve the rights of minorities. More so as a party than that of the Republican party of today, or really the last 100 years. That does not include all. There have been bad and good on both sides, but stating the general terms. Obviously, because of this minorities tend to identify more with democrats. It's kind of like that crazy argument you are always spewing about white people and Herro. And by saying it's crazy, is not me saying it's untrue in this case. I do believe in a lot of instances it is, and that is incredibly sad and one of the reasons black voters tend to flock more to democrats and liberals. And now you are saying far more minority and female candidates on the democratic side. So if that logic applies to white people, why would it not apply to minorities? As sad as it is.
Why would I be scared? Liker seriously, what is there to be afraid of?
Exactly, you said Obama waited 2 yrs to pardon anyone, he was sworn in in Jan 20 2009, dumbass, exactly what I said. Thank you for proving me right. What college you get your MBA from?. Still fact is that Obama still pardoned more people than Trump has, that was the original point. Trump being in office for how long? 7 people? That is what I'm talking about. I mispoke on my dates. I'll admit that. And the 200 bIllion is real cash and assets that were frozen. Still don't know why you named yourself, vagina, very infantile. Go google and cut n paste more liberal scwag, next you will be quoting wapo, huffpost, vox and nyt...Wait you already did. Good look with convincing others by straight ripping what reporters print. It's Friday, almost quitting time. Later pu$$y, mean gspot. Remember to pull your fingers toward the front wall...coochie cookie coo..now to go get some 30% fire, high in myrcene and limonene and get my chill on.DECEMBER 3, 2010
Download PDF Clemency Warrant
NAME DISTRICT SENTENCED OFFENSE
James Bernard Banks D. Utah 1972 Illegal possession of government property (misdemeanor), 18 U.S.C. § 641
Russell James Dixon N. D. Ga. 1960 Felony liquor law violation, 26 U.S.C. § 5604(a)(1)
Laurens Dorsey D. N. J. 1998 Conspiracy to defraud the United States by making false statements to the FDA, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1001
Ronald Lee Foster E. D. N. C. 1963 Mutilation of coins, 18 U.S.C. § 331
Timothy James Gallagher D. Ariz. 1982 Conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846
Roxane Kay Hettinger N. D. Iowa 1986 Conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846
Edgar Leopold Kranz, Jr. U.S. Air Force general court-martial 1994 Wrongful use of cocaine, adultery, and writing three insufficient fund checks, Articles 112a and 134, U.C.M.J.
Floretta Leavy D. Kan. 1984 Distribution of cocaine, conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (a)(2) and 846, 18 U.S.C. § 2
Scoey Lathaniel Morris W. D. Tex. 1999 Passing counterfeit obligations or securities, 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 and 2
You Mean This Table? What is the Date there, big guy? So about that reading comprehension thing........?
What does a phone have to do with it? That's like saying you cant spell because you are writing with a pen instead of pencil. The damn thing literally has spell check.
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...nald-trump-iran-150-billion-and-18-billion-c/
Again, here we go with your fake news facts. 151.8 Billion was the actual number. Of course, Trump stated higher so you bought it. Facts present another story though. Only the 1.8 billion was actual cash. The rest was assets.
On January 17, the United States government agreed to repay $400 million plus approximately $1.3 billion in accumulated interest to the Iranian government to resolve a disputed arms sale between the two nations that occurred “prior to the break in diplomatic ties” during the 1979 Iranian revolution. According to reporting from Agence France-Presse (AFP) and other news agencies, the payment resolved a deadlock at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal that had stood since the tribunal’s inception in 1981, and represented “a broader clearing of the decks between the old foes” just one day after the signing of an historic nuclear agreement. AFP reported at the time that the Obama administration’s political opponents were already attempting to scandalize the arrangement:
LMAO, or it could be a tribute to Grafenberg, but hey, you spin your narrative and assumptions however you want. Lord knows you don't have facts. You got your head in gutter, which maybe explains why it is void of fact.![]()
When is the vote for confirmation coming? Enough of this nonsense
Is this a serious question?I wonder if any major universities will follow suit? Or do they just keep receiving the Big Nike Money??
Todd Starnes: Truett McConnell University drops Nike relationship
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018...nnell-university-drops-nike-relationship.html
Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
Actually they are simply doing what the GOP did the previous 8 years.I cannot stomach to hear a Democrat ever speak about bipartisanship. These people can suck my nuts. When do these people EVER reach across the aisle? They oppose everything.
Tax breaks? Against it
Enforcing immigration law? Against it
Guns? Against it
SCOTUS nominations? Against em
The left only calls for bipartisanship when it’s for their cause.
FFYyour lack of understanding of scripture is really something to behold.
You should try anyway..ya never know it might do some good.Why would people in Chicago hate me for telling them they are right and white people have enslaved and oppressed them for decades? Also, crime in Chicago isn't so much a racial thing as drug and money thing. They generally don't give a shit about your skin color as long as you have something of value to them. Not sure how that would accomplish much.
Naw man...You can handle it!!I'm all for putting myself in peculiar situations.
Who cares about economic development in the state. He made mean analogies!
Lol wait did obama come out today and claim he is responsible for how great the economy is..lololol...two years after he is out of office...lolololol. the same guy that said theres nothing we can do it's not coming back, deal with it...lololol
I think the data is readily available if a person is willing to look and crunch some numbers. But let's look at some statistics from an article I read a couple of years ago discussing the black lives matter movement. In 2015 police killed 987 civilians. 493, or 50% of those were white, 258, or 26% were black, the rest were other. In the vast majority of those shootings the persons were armed or otherwise threatening the officer. So we first have to understand that using the percent of the population compared with the percent killed by police is not a valid measure of bias by police. In other words, what is relevant is how many times a police officer is coming in contact with a person because that person has committed a crime or is a suspect in a crime. Right off the bat, high crime neighborhoods will have more of this than low crime neighborhoods because they come in contact with police in threatening situations much more than the folks living in low crime neighborhoods.Can you provide some evidence to support this?
There are huge racial disparities in how US police use force. Black people are much more likely to be shot by police than their white peers.I think the data is readily available if a person is willing to look and crunch some numbers. But let's look at some statistics from an article I read a couple of years ago discussing the black lives matter movement. In 2015 police killed 987 civilians. 493, or 50% of those were white, 258, or 26% were black, the rest were other. In the vast majority of those shootings the persons were armed or otherwise threatening the officer. So we first have to understand that using the percent of the population compared with the percent killed by police is not a valid measure of bias by police. In other words, what is relevant is how many times a police officer is coming in contact with a person because that person has committed a crime or is a suspect in a crime. Right off the bat, high crime neighborhoods will have more of this than low crime neighborhoods because they come in contact with police in threatening situations much more than the folks living in low crime neighborhoods.
Statistically, one would expect blacks to be killed by cops at a much higher rate than they actually are.
I almost feel like these hearings shouldn't go on but for one or two days at most. Hell, everyone already knew if they were voting for him or not the day after he was nominated. A bunch of morons screaming at each other for 3-4 days is over the top. Just call the vote already.When is the vote for confirmation coming? Enough of this nonsense