And I pointed out your comment was a total strawman and is absolutely nothing like what the NYT columnist is suggesting.
Just to be clear, there's nothing wrong with a publication having a lean. That's typical, but it becomes a problem when they, 1. deny it and lie about, pretending to be neutral and 2. allow their bias to affect their work and hamper them from reporting the facts instead of the narrative they want their subscribers to believe.
That's exactly what this NYT columnist suggested. He suggested that the media purposely ignore reporting on the economy and all of the good things Trump accomplishes, but instead allow their hate and bias for Trump to take over, to focus on only on Trump and slander him in a plot to turn off conservative voters.
Basically he's saying to only report that Trump is a treasonous, dangerous, traitorous asshole 24 hours a day, seven days a week and purposely ignore everything good no matter how true it is. Purposely ignoring facts you don't like and reporting slanderous opinion isn't journalism, it's partisan activism.