![Laughing [laughing] [laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif)
Did you even read this? It's even more laughable the more I read. Sheesh. The bullshit they feed you guys.
The Pinocchio Test
Finally, there is no evidence that Clinton was involved in Steele’s reports.
This is after they just admitted that the Hillary campaign and the DNC hired Perkins Coie, who then hired Steele, who then paid Russian officials for dirt on Trump. They call it false because Hillary wasn't personally involved. More semantics and word games.
There's no evidence that Trump was personally involved in anything, especially the Don Jr. meeting, yet here you are accusing him of collusion. Imagine that? According to WaPo 'fact checkers', since Trump wasn't personally involved, you get four Pinocchios.
Not to mention, aren't you all constantly accusing Trump for things people who worked on his campaign may or may not have done?
Again, Fallon specifically said "on behalf of our campaign". There's a clear cut admission that the campaign was involved, and it was printed by WaPo.
“Opposition research happens on every campaign,” he told The Post. He also said: “I am damn glad [Elias] pursued this on behalf of our campaign and only regret more of this material was not verified in time for the voters to learn it before the election.”
Like i said, stop with the fake outrage, hypocrisy and double standards. It's embarrassing, so embarrassing that 'fact checkers' are forced to talk out of both sides of their mouths to explain it away.