I liked it.It was a clear nod to you...it;s like that johnny-come-lately stole your material. What nerve, eh
I liked it.It was a clear nod to you...it;s like that johnny-come-lately stole your material. What nerve, eh
Well, the fact that they did not cover their hands suggested they were just there to disrupt or the black matters demonstrators are not very bright.Did you guys see two BLM activists dressed up as KKK members and tried to pass themselves off as Trump supporters? My God...
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2...rters-were-blacklivesmatter-daniel-greenfield
![]()
More false flag BS.
Well, the fact that they did not cover their hands suggested they were just there to disrupt or the black matters demonstrators are not very bright.
Well, the fact that they did not cover their hands suggested they were just there to disrupt or the black matters demonstrators are not very bright.
Ya know, if anybody believes that the KKK would show up to a Trump rally, then they need to be executed.
You know who else needs to be executed? The media. For trying to run this bullshit game on us.
What media "ran" with this "shit"? Twitter? Is that what is considered "media"?
Because they don't like men? Always said the only good thing you could say about hillary is that she would be better than obammer. At least she has balls.I follow Janis Ian on Facebook, because she's hilarious, (and talented.) Even the gay feminists don't like Hillary. I'd say she's got a bit of a problem when what should be your absolute core constituents aren't backing you 100%.
What media "ran" with this "shit"? Twitter? Is that what is considered "media"?
Janis Ian gave me a wireless receiver for delivering a wire sculpture of a giraffe to her Nashville home. Very nice and supportive lady. And I haven't pawned the receiver set yet.I follow Janis Ian on Facebook, because she's hilarious, (and talented.) Even the gay feminists don't like Hillary. I'd say she's got a bit of a problem when what should be your absolute core constituents aren't backing you 100%.
How old were you -17?Janis Ian gave me a wireless receiver for delivering a wire sculpture of a giraffe to her Nashville home. Very nice and supportive lady. And I haven't pawned the receiver set yet.
I get a bit taken back by some of Heisman's race stuff however I do wish we could get some KKK history in a positive light like we get Black Panthers stuff.
I don't think anyone pursuing a degree like this, theatre, philosophy, etc is under the impression they're going to make a lot money when they graduate. I don't think these people are the ones complaining about a wage gap. I could be wrong. In my experience these folks aren't too concerned with wealth or even making a decent wage. Maybe I'm missing the point of this as well. Seems to me that the ones that are complaining, or at least have a legitimate complaint, are the ones making 4, 5, 6 times less than upper management. Take banking for instance. The people on the front lines, on their feet all day, dealing with all the shit day in and day out, make barely above minimum wage. While "officers" and upper management can leave anytime they want, take extended lunches, go play golf with clients, etc and make 6 times more with bonuses.
Mime- once of these big boys grabs that unverified bit, they'll more than likely to run with it. They've run with half ass info of reddit before.
Ah, OK, we've graduated to bashing the media for things they may or may not do.
Damn liberal media
Don't get me wrong, the for-profit, sensationaliat media machine sucks, but about 75% of the complaints towards "it" is baseless and quite comical
Aaron Ford is - Minority Leader of Nevada State Senate, Senator for Nevada's 11th District, and Partner at Eglet Prince.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...s-donald-trump-in-nevada-caucus-a6897981.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...es-plagued-serious-problems-article-1.2541857
http://www.thewrap.com/trump-supporters-wear-ku-klux-klan-robes-at-nevada-caucus/
http://thesource.com/2016/02/24/ku-...pport-donald-trumps-victory-at-nevada-caucus/
![]()
Ah, OK, we've graduated to bashing the media for things they may or may not do.
Damn liberal media
Don't get me wrong, the for-profit, sensationaliat media machine sucks, but about 75% of the complaints towards "it" is baseless and quite comical
And I really don't know why people are upset.Donald Trump is going to be the next President of the United States.
I do wish we could get some KKK history in a positive light like we get Black Panthers stuff.
How often more than anything. Seemingly spend a lot of energy on it. Almost daily it seems there is some reason to make some post about an anti-white movement.
And I really don't know why people are upset.
He cannot be half as bad as the current POS ruining our country.
Donald Trump is going to be the next President of the United States.
Not with my help.
It's more complicated than that. A lot of it is Trump's massive ego. Insults everybody. Is all over the place with his positions. He's dangerous IMO. I don't think any of them are the cat's meow. They're all politicians.
Donald Trump is going to be the next President of the United States.
There's a daily dose of it, that's why. I get to hear this BS on a daily basis. That's why I bring it up. Maybe you're not around it as much as I am in academia and in SoCal but an entire generation is being brought up on this nonsense.
No one else mentions it but we'll make a national story out Steve Austin saying "shucking and jiving" but ignore the other 90 percent of interracial violence and hoaxes. Just sick of the brainwashing.
I'm not so sure about that. He is a good businessman and he's a great negotiator. Something America is lacking. I'm with you. I have no clue what he will do. I think he's the guy of all the candidates that could prolly win this thing on a modest campaign budget. I think his massive ego would be good against special interests trying to buy him out. It's an interesting election.
All is proceeding as I have foreseen. If Trump is the nominee, there will be a bombardment of character defining negative advertising never before seen. Everything about this year and about Trump is unconventional, so maybe I'm reading it wrong. But I'm reading it like an easy win for Hillary. The last sentence below amazes. Out to lunch much?
"This will all be in the tradition of the early Democratic ad campaigns that successfully kneecapped Republican nominees in 1996 and 2012 (Bob Dole and Mitt Romney, respectively). Trump’s negatives are already sky-high with the general public (60 percent), and a Democratic campaign to disqualify him would seek to make his unfavorable rating not merely alarming, but completely radioactive.
How will Trump fare against such ads? Maybe he will prove impervious to all such criticism, and counterpunch effectively. Or maybe he will wilt under the assault. Who knows? But Democrats will sure as hell find out....
Yes, Trump has been constantly criticized. But op-ed’s aren’t the same as attack ads. Dismissive pundits aren’t the same as rival candidates out for blood. A Politico analysis found that of $238 million in spending by big-money groups so far, only 4 percent has been directed at the man on the cusp of securing the nomination."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/anti-donald-trump-ads-opinion-213675#ixzz41NgK83LO
Bush spending all that money going after Rubio is inexplicable. I think most of these guys have just tried to avoid getting in the mud with Trump.All is proceeding as I have foreseen. If Trump is the nominee, there will be a bombardment of character defining negative advertising never before seen. Everything about this year and about Trump is unconventional, so maybe I'm reading it wrong. But I'm reading it like an easy win for Hillary. The last sentence below amazes. Out to lunch much?
"This will all be in the tradition of the early Democratic ad campaigns that successfully kneecapped Republican nominees in 1996 and 2012 (Bob Dole and Mitt Romney, respectively). Trump’s negatives are already sky-high with the general public (60 percent), and a Democratic campaign to disqualify him would seek to make his unfavorable rating not merely alarming, but completely radioactive.
How will Trump fare against such ads? Maybe he will prove impervious to all such criticism, and counterpunch effectively. Or maybe he will wilt under the assault. Who knows? But Democrats will sure as hell find out....
Yes, Trump has been constantly criticized. But op-ed’s aren’t the same as attack ads. Dismissive pundits aren’t the same as rival candidates out for blood. A Politico analysis found that of $238 million in spending by big-money groups so far, only 4 percent has been directed at the man on the cusp of securing the nomination."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/anti-donald-trump-ads-opinion-213675#ixzz41NgK83LO