l
Yep. Dems have thrived on creating racial division and making minorities feel "oppressed." I see it every single day on campus. Everything has to be made about race and it's always from white liberal professors. They love portraying themselves as the savior to these people.
The funny thing is, the northeastern liberal elites would never want to live around these voting blocks they have. You think they'd want to live by illegals, live in black majority neighborhoods or offer to have Muslim refugees live among them? Nope.
I do enjoy seeing her get blasted and her hypocrisy come to light as well as all of her corruption but it's comical to think someone else is responsible for blacks committing crimes.
Oh, man. You could just tell they weren't used to a black person putting them on blast. They knew that was a fragile thing. It's really easy to bash whites, conservatives and Christians but not so much when it's a minority, is it Hillary? And I doubt MSNBC/CNN will touch this.
Ya it was Hillary. And I agree we'll never get whiff of this from MSM.
Youre exactly right about the "do as I say, not as I do" mantra from the Dems. They all want illegals flooding in and voting for them; but not living around them. They all wail against rich white people and demand income equality; but it doesnt apply to them of course. They pushed Obama care down our throats, then exempted themselves from it.
+1
the general practice of having entire organizations based upon funneling money towards lobbying efforts is disturbing, but that's the system we've let our legislature perpetuate. Not that SCOTUS has anything to do with it...
SCOTUS killed the best attempt at meaningful campaign finance reform. Based on recent decisions, I dont know any restriction at all on political speech, in the form of restricting campaign contributions, will pass muster.
Well, it's simple, and we'll know soon enough. Either the ceiling that people have claimed Trump has is real, or it's not. And who knows. He does have negative numbers and "would never vote for under any circumstances" numbers higher than anyone in memory. So maybe it's true, when it gets down to 2 Repubs, or certainly in a general, he just can't get over 45% or whatever the claimed number is, and he'll be toast. But sometimes candidates just seem to have ceilings until they don't. Dukakis was said to have a ceiling in the Democratic primary. Sometimes people either don't know a guy or maybe he just doesn't seem presidential - and that kind of thing wears off over time. The public gets used to a guy, gets used to the idea of him being president, and there goes your ceiling....
All true. I think for a long while, people thought he wasnt serious and it was for publicity. I think the more serious people saw him become, the more he talked (no matter what he said) the more people started wandering over to his camp.
Once he puts out Cruz, I think Cruz's supporters will turn to Trump. So will Carson's. Theyre both anti establishment candidates and so is Trump. Thatll put Rubio in a real bind. Rubio will pick up Kasich supporters, what few they are.
I think the polls are probably right. Only problem is, when it comes to actual votes it SEEMS like Trump does better than the polls. I really think its because he has a fair contingency of closet supporters that show support only at the booth. What else can explain it? You cant find any non-lunatics who say they support him, but he keeps steamrolling people.
I saw someone post earlier about a potential Trump/Rubio ticket. That wouldnt be bad. Neither would Trump/Kasich. Those would at least unify the GOP and likely deliver at least one necessary battleground state. For whatever reason, I dont see Trump doing either. Itll be someone else.
The HillVerified account@thehill
