Historically?
Obviously not. We've had courts uphold slavery. I'm speaking of the "modern" courts
Historically?
"Following the constitution" means not making stuff up out of thin air to push through abortion or gay marriage. At least with Citizens United you could at least derive freedom of speech out of it. But the first two - what the hell?
It used to be like that. Ginsburg was suggested by Orrin f*cking Hatch and was confirmed by a 96-3 vote.
Obviously not. We've had courts uphold slavery. I'm speaking of the "modern" courts
Very interesting that Scalia is dead a mere two months before the Supreme Court is to hear the challenge on Obama's immigration actions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/u...llenge-to-obama-immigration-actions.html?_r=0
Trump is acting like a spoiled little brat kid. He's totally disruptive and immature in his actions. Unless he can get control over himself, they should take him off the stage.
It being the responsibility of the sitting president and all.
Only republicans would imagine it being a controversy that the president fill a supreme court eleven months before leaving office. Somehow I don't see McConnell not voting if his seat was up for election this year. Maybe Obama can nominate a justice who wants to prevent coal miners from getting pensions. Then McConnell would push it through just to screw over poor Kentuckians.
glad this POS is dead
vile person
Klee vs Kandinsky study. Absolutely you're right.
https://explorable.com/social-judgment-theory-experiment
his contempt for vulnerable people was f--king visceral and he was for executing both minors and the mentally retarded
but i owe it to wayne dougan to pretend to be upset at this bloated opus dei freak's passing
Then Scalia is probably your guy. He had an abiding philosophy - what did the words in the text mean to the people who passed the law? That is a standard that he held to, irrespective of the outcome it leads to. So, for example, he held that burning the American flag - certainly an act he found personally repugnant - was an expression protected by the first amendment. Contrast that with those who view the Constitution a a "living document", which means that it means whatever a majority says it means. And that leads to, as an example, a constitutional right to privacy that is found no where in the constitution, and somehow went unnoticed for nearly 200 years. Then, out of the blue, a group of justices in the 60s "found" that right. Look!! Right there!! It's right there! Even if you agree with some of those results, the dangers of giving any majority - here, 5 justices out of 9 - the power to rule any way they want should be obvious.....It's sad the the SCOTUS has become political. They are supposed to follow the constitution not their personal political beliefs. Shouldn't matter who appoints them.
It's pretty disconcerting to already be resigned to the fact that no one who respects the actual language of the Constitution has even a modicum of a chance of even being mentioned as a possibility
very interesting. Took some time to reflect after reading. Made me think of two things. The social formation of the global warming / climate change community and their propensity to ostracize dissention. And two, the manner in which young children rank and file - develop meanness at early ages toward other children that don't fit in. My own grandchildren are bad about this. I was right. Your understanding of such subjects makes mine out to be the raw skilled novice that it is. Thanks very much for sharing
Gonna post something that absolutely carries no weight.
You pussies. Don't come crying to us Libertarians for our votes. Jack offs. Once ya'll ruin this place, you'll be beggin for us to come save you. Well, tough f***** didley doo, lick my balls and my stool. We ain't gonna bail you out Nope, kiss my ass. I remember when this country was awesome. Back when the Native Americans were running the show c*** suckers
Edit: The more I think about it. I hate your families for generational voting. Hate mine too. Wish I could go back and stick my fist in every family member's anus. GD Aunt Patty screw you too. Hated her.
You know you damn Repubs and Dems have worked together to screw us. No bill gets passed other than Obamacare, you Repub and Dem have needed signatures for everything else. Ya'll effed us. Then try to blow out our ass with your garbage media. GD families giving birth to future voters. effing hate you
huh? What? There is no quandary, Obama doesn't get to fill this slot, period, no negotiations no bargaining. Price the left pays for him ruling for 7 years without compromising or negotiating, price they pay for blocking gwb judges like Estrada and Owens.Today's bluster aside, McConnell is in a quandary here. If they stone-cold cockblock Obama all year and end up losing the Senate (very possible), they could end up watching an extremely liberal Justice appointed once the next congress takes office.
If they negotiate towards a moderately-liberal appointment this spring, they might avoid another RBG and instead compromise on a Kennedy
You mean pointing to facts that Trump makes racist statements? Yes.Is this how you usually engage in discussion? Hilarious.
Yea, all you so called conservatives...huh? What? There is no quandary, Obama doesn't get to fill this slot, period, no negotiations no bargaining. Price the left pays for him ruling for 7 years without compromising or negotiating, price they pay for blocking gwb judges like Estrada and Owens.
Liberals can and will do their best to force it but it will not happen. Their threats are toothless, gop would lose more base votes in nov allowing another Obama pick on the court than they would gain allowing it to happen.
Yea, all you so called conservatives...
When you don't like the actual rules of government, ignore them!
Pretty much par for the course.
Not a Christian? Let the government make you one! Always wanting the government to do things for you!
(See how hyperbole works)
So they should block any/all Obama nominees even if it significantly raises the risk of a far left justice being confirmed by the new Senate next year? Seems about as logical as Cruz' government shutdown theatrics.huh? What? There is no quandary, Obama doesn't get to fill this slot, period, no negotiations no bargaining. Price the left pays for him ruling for 7 years without compromising or negotiating, price they pay for blocking gwb judges like Estrada and Owens.
Liberals can and will do their best to force it but it will not happen. Their threats are toothless, gop would lose more base votes in nov allowing another Obama pick on the court than they would gain allowing it to happen.