POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
So why would banging a chick before presidency. Donald Trump
Be as bad as
Banging a chick in the Oval Office while being president? Bill Clinton
What am I missing here?
You're not missing anything. By the end of the interview, even Trump hating Tapper is no longer taking the guy seriously and is laughing at his absurdities.
Any guesses on who Mack names? No way she doesn't talk. Get you a slice of that.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
I just knew one of you would be here crowing about this and trying to twist it into an imaginary win. You might want to calm down just a little. This had to do with legal immigrants, not illegal immigrants.Gorsuch made his opinion on the matter very clear. He firmly believes the law should be followed, and that legal immigrants who commit violent felonies should be deported immediately.
His vote wasn't in support of not deporting legal immigrants who commit violent felonies. His vote was against the actual wording of the law because he feels it's too vague and fails draw a line that clearly differentiates between non violent and violent felonies.
Words of advice. If you're trying to use Gorsuch's one vote in this criminal deportation case as an "ah ha" moment to crow about, then you are neither familiar with Gorsuch's record nor how this decision fits into his broader conservatism, so you should probably sit this one out.
Gorsuch did not join all of Kagan’s opinion, but he agreed with the outcome. “Vague laws invite arbitrary power,” Gorsuch wrote in concurring with the majority.
He mentioned that before the American Revolution, the crime of treason in English law gave authorities power to go after those whose opinions they disliked.
“Today’s vague laws may not be as invidious, but they can invite the exercise of arbitrary power all the same — by leaving the people in the dark about what the law demands and allowing prosecutors and courts to make it up,” he wrote.
For the conservative Gorsuch to align with the liberals might seem a surprise, but his vote was in keeping with questions he asked during oral argument in October. And he was in part following in the footsteps of the justice he replaced, the late Antonin Scalia.
Abortion wasnt part of your original post..
But yea, abortion is a big deal... most conservatives dont really care for babies being sliced and diced. Or vacuumed or anything similar.
I dont think that's a conservative issue...I think it's a sane decent person issue.
You should count your blessings that you have people here to tell you how to interpret reality. You are totally lost on your own and incapable of understanding even the simplest of concepts. Some of the other dims here, like fuzz and johnkba, are just misguided, but you are without a doubt a no holds barred industrial strength idiot.
I'm an Atheist. Kinda changed my views on abortion. Still pro-choice. But getting more towards outlawing it. Has nothing to do with jesus or god. Could give a shit about either of them
Apparently butt sex still good though, so there’s that.
I could have written that. Feel the same way. I'm still kinda ok with very early term but I'm against the late term abortions.
I used to be really religious and vehemently pro life. I guess I was sane and decent then and now I’m insane and Indecent? Get off your pedestal guy.
So true. CNN is like soft porn: titillating and raising the excitement of those suffering from TDS...without actually showing or revealing anything real.
You can’t seem to separate religion and being against abortion. Being religious or not has no bearing on whether a person thinks it f*cking insane for society to accept killing of a child in the womb.
The same people that would call the police if a parent spanks a kid willfully accepts the killing of them in the womb, it’s insanity.
The justices simply said that the written law was vague. Don't worry Gorsuch will vote like Thomas/Scalia/Alito in most cases When Kennedy retires this fall the court will move further right .
Can’t wait to juxtapose this pic with the insane party agents have when Hillary goes.
Shewee... there’s the Canuck of days gone by
You seem to have major issues with the church and people who don’t agree with you. Do you need the doll to show us where the priest.....
As a non religious dude myself, I would say anyone that supports abortion past the first few weeks is indecent, that’s correct. And I’ll stay on that “pedestal, eh”
I’d also say the guy consistently getting testy about non church going folks not being as “douchy” as church goers and ranting about echo chambers when people disagreed with you today was actually the one on said pedestal.
Shouldn’t you be about 18 beers deep after 18 holes?
Holy hell and a tootsie roll
I’m not sure I’ve heard guided - blunt force trauma verbiage ...that was somehow...still restrained and gentlemanly...since ....
It’s like cyrano debergerac and bobby knight just blended souls for a second
Hey - no offense James Lee....I honestly don’t have any IDEA what you post or how you think...I’m not dog-pilling on YOU
Those were really well cadenced words man.....back to the Strat now!
Economy rolling...consumer confidence at record highs...jobless claims at record lows...black unemployment lowest in years...small business and manufacturing growth...tax cuts implemented...illegal immigration declining...ISIS being defeated...overall foreign policy excellent...and now a giant cherry on top w/ the NKorea news..............................and the idiots on the left file a lawsuit because they lost and Hillary is still crying over losing.
#MAGA
#MAGA
CNN homepage right now has nothing at all about N Korea stopping nukes, ........but does have a story about Jared Lorenzen losing 100 pounds.
The GOP let their base down, Hillary was not even a choice for us and Trump seems to really love this country. That and he gave conservatives hope that he would change the way business was conducted in Washington.
Wrong about the spelling part....other than that, maybe. But, spendaholic politicians do not usually give you tax cuts, just saying.
Similar threads
