Liberals are so effing blind to their own double standards it's unbelievable. So, an unborn baby...
That's the part that people on the other side disagree about.
FTS, CNN is just as bad. CNN will fabricate any story in order. CNN are drama whores
CNN's failings are more general incompetence than anything they deliberately do. Seriously mismanaged.
Maybe we should just kill anyone in a state assisted mental institute. Or in prison at government expense. Or pull the plug on those with severe medical needs unless the family or the insurance company is willing to pay for their care? Or..let's just clean out the nursing homes--they aren't really providing any value and it sure costs a lot of money for their care.
THAT'S the old liberal caring spirit. If they are basically unwanted...why should we keep them alive unless they can pay for their own care?
See above.
The rest of it is crap when I point out a huge hypocrisy in abortion? Are you serious? I just gave you a GD example of both situations where there's a baby in the womb of two women. One wants it and is murdered and her baby dies. The killer is charged with its murder. Another woman doesn't wants it, kills the baby and it's totally okay.
That's a product of the laws that society enacted, not a moral justification for treating them differently. Obviously these are contentious issues, and the laws reflect the compromises that happen in a hotly contested issue in a democratic society. BTW, you can find hypocrisy in our laws on a number of subjects, not just fetuses.
Well, on a state level, states define what a fetus is. The federal gov't has its own definition of it. Varies from state to state. That's prolly why. Plus if the woman is 8 months pregnant, yeah I can see a double homicide. But if the woman is a week knocked up, then no. 1 single murder charge.
Absolutely.
So what about this guy tricking his girlfriend jnto taking abortion pill that was sentenced?
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/crime...ng-girlfriend-abortion-pill-article-1.1593401
There's no consistency.
See above.
On an interesting level, I find it kind of comical that the black community votes Democrat despite it being the party that
A)Did not want to abolish slavery
B)Had Jim Crow laws
C)that is all about funding Planned Parenthood; an organization that was started by Margaret Sanger to eliminate inferior races (blacks-her words)
Yes, because A) nothing changed at all here, nope, there was no shift in party politics in the 1960s and 1970s. FFS, this argument was floating around dial-up internet days. B) see A. C) yes, nothing changed at all, ever, and things are exactly the same. At least this last one wasn't widely circulated until the last couple years, so you're catching up.
If you're trotting out these arguments in 2016, you're either deliberately obtuse or mentally compromised. Or both.
Oh, here's one for you. Why do people who overuse words like freedom and liberty ejaculate at the words "founding fathers" when almost all of them were unapologetic slave owners and enacted a system restricting the vote to white male landowners? Kind of comical, no?
Who is paying for all of the ones not working now and living off of the government. My point is, where do we draw the line where it is ok to murder fertilized eggs because they are now inconvenient to us.
Generally, 20 weeks after conception. Sometimes 22 or 24 weeks.
If life begins at conception, then God is a mass murderer.
As many as 75% of all conceptions miscarry. I'd say purgatory is getting full, but most miscarried fertilized eggs are just a handful of cells so the physical space they occupy is small. I jest around a serious subject, but only because I realize it's touchy and difficult. The more we know about life, the more old notions are challenged.
