POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Simpsons is like a gateway drug to Family Guy.
That ain't my battle man. If Christians think their voting patterns will make Jeebus accept them, more power to them I guess.
There are core values which many people regardless of religious beliefs hold that they will not yield on. I will not vote for a pro-choice candidate. I know some democrats who will not vote for a pro choice candidate although admittedly they are the minority of their party.
"The Boy Scouts of America's board of directors has unanimously agreed to welcome girls into the Cub Scout program and to forge a path for older girls to pursue and earn the highest rank of Eagle Scout, the organization said Wednesday."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy-scouts-will-allow-girls-to-join/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy-scouts-will-allow-girls-to-join/index.html
I could vote for a pro-choice candidate depending on the situation. However, its more than just issue itself for me, it tells me a lot more about the candidate who thinks that is legally okay. A character test of sorts.
With all the PC stuff/ social justice warrior stuff going on today, I don't see how this issue isn't included, except for personal convenience.
As Christians, EVERYTHING we do, say, and even think, matters and will be judged.
Kinda keeps us in our lane lol.
Which is ironic because Roe v Wade isn't going anywhere. Like Trump said, it's settled law. Women will have the right to choose for the foreseeable future, just like John Q Public will have the right to buy and own an arsenal of weapons for the foreseeable future.
It amazes me how much attention Roe and the 2A get during every election cycle considering they are both near locks to stay in force for as long as this country exists.
This is what happens when liberals get control of culture. They destroy everything.
If that was real, 2020 would be in the bag. Lol
Former Boy Scout here. This can only be good. I don't know how many times at a camping outpost we wished there were girls around.
The history and manipulation to get Roe v Wade is super interesting. So many lies.
I think the 2A was absolutely on the agenda for Hillary. She wouldn't have been able to do it until after 2020. She would've had the Supreme Court to do it. She would have the votes to make sure she won again after flooding us with the third world.
This will only lead to more Boy Scouts pitching tents.
Last edited:
Republican president and Congress. Really. Look it up. Right now.
End of hijack.
It's actually a pretty straight laced move on their part you know, introducing some heterosexual options for the troop leaders for a change.
Not to mention this opens the door for males to enter the girl scout world and steal alllllllll the cookies. Stupid idiots.
Had Hillary won I don't think she makes it past 2020. 16 years with one party in control is about unheard of.
That is not relevant and you know it. Or maybe you don't. Regardless, EAD.
Normally, I agree. But immigration changed the game especially with how many she wanted to bring in. Given how the Trump base was sick of GOP Romney types, can't imagine them getting enough enthusiasm for a candidate to beat her with all of those factors against them.
I may not have agreed with all of them, but I'd rather the BSA still had their original principles than what they've now become, which is totally destroyed. Give liberals an inch and they take a mile.
Sounds like the Scouts have decided to teach the boys some important life lessons early.
Wait till kids quit enrolling into BSA. Then they will scream misogynist.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
I wonder who Trump was actually talking about
Boys should take a knee in protest during the pledge at the start of each scout meeting.
If she won, it would be the end of two party system. Amnesty and open borders wouldve guaranteed that.
Thats why her losing was such a bitter, bitter pill for the left to swallow
Dems need a very moderate candidate to beat Trump. Can't be some crazy left winger, socialist type. They run Elizabeth Warren or some token African American women, they lose bigly.
I know me and ymott are a couple that are probably being referred to in this discussion. I've never used a derogatory term or anything of that nature. I simply state truth regarding the issues within the culture, crime stats, the lack of nuclear family, the deep hatred that many have for white people and note the delusion that many believe regarding history.
The sad thing is, unless you're all in on the "whitey is the devil" train or push self loathing or act like non-white people should never receive any scrutiny or have personal responsibility, you get labeled as "racist."
We've been conditioned to cringe if anyone dare speaks the truth on any group that isn't a white person. The double standard occurs all the time. That's why Jemele Hill and black politicians and celebs and media types can say whatever vile stuff they want about anyone and nothing happens. White people are fair game.
Similar threads
