Amazing how much of a total sleaze bag Comey was.So before doing an investigation, the FBI told Manafort he'd be indicted. And before doing an investigation, the FBI assured Clinton's friends she wouldn't be indicted.
Hmmm...
Sounds reasonable.
There's been several lawsuits aimed at CNN recently. Probably think they are getting revenge by doing this stuff to Fox.This is a new one and the reason for my earlier post. It disappeared for some reason but not before @Willy4UK was able to quote it. Either they're all a bunch of perverted rapists at Fox or something more sinister is at play here.
I do find it odd that none of them have been brought up on charges and convicted in a court of law. Bringing them to justice seems secondary in all of this. The main focus seems to be on attacking Fox News.
Imagine being such a sensitive snowflake you get triggered over a negative article about a guy who is a known asshole.
I swear some of these STICK TO SPORTS!!1! people would get triggered if a liberal sports personality posted a negative article on terrorists.
Suckers.
Even if they did they'd completely leave out the radical Islam part while labeling them far right wing.The joke is on you. A liberal wouldn't post a negative article on a terrorist.
It's even worse when you look at it from this perspective. There's been 500 murders in Chicago this year. 11 dead and 40 wounded just this weekend alone, and Illinois congressman Luis Gutierrez is in NY, side by side with lawbreakers, protesting for their right to break the law without consequence.There really needs to be some sort of rule that if you get arrested as a politician, that you must resign immediately. Nonsense that these 3 clowns will still be allowed to serve.
I chose my side long before there was twitter, long before the internet. I am a constitutional conservative and will gravitate toward the party that I feel most represents my views.
I don't tweet and the majority that I read are the ones that are posted here. I have Amy Mek on my favorites list but only check it every week or two. Is she a social engineer? Or is she just another person with an opinion on our society?
Climate change not as threatening to planet as previously thought, new research suggests
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...eat-climate-change-exaggerated-faulty-models/
Suckers.
Agree. Needs to be a separate thread on this forum for merging threads from other forums that nobody gives two shits about. If its a thread that has hurt someone's feelings they can put their lips on my country ass.Absolutely hate it when mods merge threads into here.
You would have to wouldn't you?what's worse
is many of their clerics / shamans - are TELLING YOU What they're coming to do to you AND your women
Honest question
If you see a rape in progress - and you aren't armed
Would you try to physically intervene?
I"ll bet 90% of you yahoos would
The IND base is into bestiality I think.Child rape belongs to your party base.
Sold me a couple last week. Old news. Who am I kidding, they were returned immediately.I just find it fascinating that Jameslee cares about that but doesn't care that Clintons and Podesta sell children and rape them.That to me is absolutely mind blowing.
Maybe Jamesleee is on the child trafficking ring and that's why he doesn't say anything about it. I'd be silent on that too if I were him
Both and not shocking but the defense is fascinating.Rape? Did you even read the story or just the headline?
I'm not saying what happened is right or wrong because I have no idea, but by her own admission the sex was mutual. Seems to me she was trying to screw her way to the top and is now a woman scorned after it not working out that way.
Ms Hughes alleged Mr Payne coerced her to have sex with him in 2013 “in exchange for career opportunities and benefits”.
The suit states Mr Payne had “used his position of power to pressure Ms Hughes into submission”.
You would have to wouldn't you?
Two things -- either that's a hell of a bluff by Manafort because he knows there's no way the DOJ releases the intercepts; or, he's genuine and really, honestly wants them released because he has nothing to hide.
What defense? That, by her own admission, she willfully consented to have sex with him because he was a man in a powerful position and she was using that to her advantage, trying to climb the corporate ladder? Where I come from, that's the opposite of rape, regardless if she failed at screwing her way to the top, regrets it and has hurt feelings years laterBoth and not shocking but the defense is fascinating.
He is definitely a pervert. His post almost always have that element in it.I just find it fascinating that Jameslee cares about that but doesn't care that Clintons and Podesta sell children and rape them.That to me is absolutely mind blowing.
Maybe Jamesleee is on the child trafficking ring and that's why he doesn't say anything about it. I'd be silent on that too if I were him
You don't care? You must not be here then. Carry on everybody, Mills_for_Three_ is not really here.The definition of irony---bitching about a sports website talking about politics on another sports website. We've entered the age of where people only believe free speech only belongs to their beliefs. The great thing about this country is if you don't like something you don't have to participate. Personally I don't care for the libs or right-wingers, ya'll all take stuff to damn seriously.
Resemble the Paddock in this episode?
By the way, there's no way you read that story, especially the two lines I quoted, and still came to the conclusion that he's automatically, with out a doubt, guilty of rape.Both and not shocking but the defense is fascinating.
Good question. There seems to be plenty of these Amy Mek types that came out of nowhere to be the voice for certain groups.
Glad you took a position before twitter/social media. Problem is the kids growing up these days are influenced by the constant propaganda.
learn jameslee....emoji coming yo wayBy the way, there's no way you read that story, especially the two lines I quoted, and still came to the conclusion that he's automatically, with out a doubt, guilty of rape.
You replied by taking issue with a Fox News employee being accused of rape. lolWhat defense?
By the way, there's no way you read that story, especially the two lines I quoted, and still came to the conclusion that he's automatically, with out a doubt, guilty of rape.
I agree of course. I'll leave the judge, jury and executioner stuff to others.By the way, there's no way you read that story, especially the two lines I quoted, and still came to the conclusion that he's automatically, with out a doubt, guilty of rape.
Practicing Christian huh? You really suck at that.He is definitely a pervert. His post almost always have that element in it.
Resemble the Paddock in this episode?
CNN is being sued for racial discrimination. I'm sure you and your fellow democrats have not defended them, right?You replied by taking issue with a Fox News employee being accused of rape. lol
The question becomes, how many allegations must occur at Fox News for this company to NOT be defended by republicans?