ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I am utterly, utterly, amazed by your lack of intellect.

But let's take this to its/your logical conclusion.

So if a lefty is arrested for child pornography then all lefties are into child porn, amirite?

You guys really got butt hurt over me mentioning Spencer.

Child porn isn't a part of being a leftist, whereas islamophobia and white nationalism are part of the toxic views of the alt right.

A lot of people on the left are into calling people out for cultural appropriation. If you were to hear a story about a person shooting someone because they were mad that that person was culturally appropriating someone, then that person would be a leftist. It's all about the specific set of ideas that each group largely believes in.
 
You guys really got butt hurt over me mentioning Spencer.

Child porn isn't a part of being a leftist, whereas islamophobia and white nationalism are part of the toxic views of the alt right.

A lot of people on the left are into calling people out for cultural appropriation. If you were to hear a story about a person shooting someone because they were mad that that person was culturally appropriating someone, then that person would be a leftist. It's all about the specific set of ideas that each group largely believes in.

You support pedophilia. Gross.
 
Screenshot_20170528-133303_zpsarzkvpdt.png

Screenshot_20170528-133322_zpsuqrjacrs.png

Seeing the original story sure does shed light on Forde's comments. Other than saying that, I am somewhat speechless, maybe even confused!

Thanks, I think. Even in context, the story is strange.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big_Blue79
Expect nothing less from yahoo. They have an agenda to push and so they hire people who are "like-minded" shall we say.
Hopefully this blows up on the mf'er and he loses his job yet again.
The like minded people who make fun of decorated veterans are the worst. We need to stop them from pushing their agenda.

PurpleHeart.jpg
 
You guys really got butt hurt over me mentioning Spencer.

Child porn isn't a part of being a leftist, whereas islamophobia and white nationalism are part of the toxic views of the alt right.

A lot of people on the left are into calling people out for cultural appropriation. If you were to hear a story about a person shooting someone because they were mad that that person was culturally appropriating someone, then that person would be a leftist. It's all about the specific set of ideas that each group largely believes in.

I really don't disagree with anything you said there - although I really didn't understand the shooting/cultural appropriation thing -- but I'm functioning on 4 Hours of sleep in 2 days so I'm probably to blame

But let me ask this - you've given examples of attitudes/behaviors that you associate with the idea of the "alt-right" - but you don't seem to associate any with the unacceptable expressions of political leftism - you may have discussed that earlier and I missed it --- I'm entering these profound thoughts via IPOD as opposed to the Big Mac (see what I did there?) that I'm more used to

So - are you saying:

The "alt-right" (however that's defined) is equivalent to fascism?

Are you also saying that racism isn't evident among people with leftist ideologies?

And - why not go ahead and acknowledge the actual-out of the closet marxists that are speaking-voting agitating for- in some cases - the complete restructure of our govt-Econ-& societal structure ----

Or are you not aware that this phenomena exists?


Questions are in good candor - this isn't an attack on you. By any stretch --- I'm down with the traditional left



But the historical ideology of Marxist progressivism INTRODUCED the world to concentration camps - kept them running for decades longer than the nazis - and exterminated an estimated 60 million in comparison to Hitler's 6 million

There's no good reason nor defense - that includes ignorance - for reasonable people to give Marxist doctrine or agitators a seat at the political table - nor accommodate their foundational theories of dialectical materialism (which ironically insists there IS no right/wrong/guilt/innocence -- so some portions of your modern American "left " WOULD be ok with child sex etc) ____ these radical principles DO hide within the American left and I hope that traditional leftists will soon call them out as they rightly called out the neoconservatives under the bush administration
Marxism is the term that's being woefully underused -and they should be tolerated as we would a neo-nazi. OR Louisville fan
 
Last edited:
Why differentiate that they're cultural. Marxists when it's clear that more than a few are on board with economic Marxism and even recreating our govt to match the political ideas of that foul ideology - seeing it now? It's a revolution

Yup and hopefully this is true.
Trump tells 'confidants' U.S. will leave Paris climate deal: Axios

Because the economic marxists are in full swing preparing their soldiers with this.
Scientists explain what will happen if Donald Trump pulls out of Paris climate change agreement
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
It's typical from that side. Progressivism is the traditional European cancer that has invaded one of our major parties. The idiology has been around for a long time, we've just had enough sense not to expose our youth to it, until now. They will be the end of the republic one day. And that's been the goal for decades. I hate it that decent people who happen to think liberal can't see through it.

They showed their true colors during the Vietnam war and almost destroyed themselves. We can only hope their extreme agenda destroys them for good this time.
 
Well back to the OP. I tried to follow the string of tweets and still don't understand any of it. Was Philip Stevens starting it by saying negative stuff about UL and that is what Forde responded to? I am confused as are some others. But, Morgousky, please tell me you are not defending the Vietnam war? Next to attacking Iraq for 9-11 that was probably the dumbest war we ever got involved with. Plus, if you go to Vietnam now they are great people who love Americans and we lost! If you really and truly support our troops (easy words for people to say) than having our soldiers go off to die for nothing is not support. Thank Goodness for the Washington Post then and now. But, f-Forde.
 
Well back to the OP. I tried to follow the string of tweets and still don't understand any of it. Was Philip Stevens starting it by saying negative stuff about UL and that is what Forde responded to? I am confused as are some others. But, Morgousky, please tell me you are not defending the Vietnam war? Next to attacking Iraq for 9-11 that was probably the dumbest war we ever got involved with. Plus, if you go to Vietnam now they are great people who love Americans and we lost! If you really and truly support our troops (easy words for people to say) than having our soldiers go off to die for nothing is not support. Thank Goodness for the Washington Post then and now. But, f-Forde.

No, we handled that war pitifully. You missed the point completely. The alt left Vietnam war opposition attacked soldiers. They saw violence as the way to express their view. Much like that side is becoming today. The were laid to ash for around 30 years and have returned, although this time they learned that attacking soldiers is a death wish, yet they still cannot help themselves. They're slowing gaining steam back to where they left off
 
No, we handled that war pitifully. You missed the point completely. The alt left Vietnam war opposition attacked soldiers. They saw violence as the way to express their view. Much like that side is becoming today. The were laid to ash for around 30 years and have returned, although this time they learned that attacking soldiers is a death wish, yet they still cannot help themselves. They're slowing gaining steam back to where they left off




This.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan
  • Like
Reactions: bigbluefattycat
That's been my entire point from the very beginning, post after post I have explained exactly this to you. Are you slow?



You lie. I've never claimed anything regarding the Rich story. My stance from the beginning is no one knows.

I'll say it again, just like Fox doesn't know he's the leaker and DNC was involved, CNN doesn't know that he wasn't the leaker and DNC wasn't involved. I've taken no position, nor have I defended any. No one has the facts. It's that simple.



Here you go. 1:40 mark, verbatim -- "One big problem, though, it's not true. In fact, the whole crazy theory had already been debunked by CNN and other news organizations."

They went much further than just saying there's no evidence to support these claims. They're reporting Seth Rich being the leaker and the DNC being involved flat out isn't true. By reporting that they're not true, then by default, they're reporting that Set Rich isn't the leaker and the DNC wasn't involved. They can't honestly report that it's not true because they don't know whether it's true or not. No one does.

Also, they claim to have debunked these claims.To debunk means to prove false. How did they prove these claims false? There is no evidence that Rich wasn't the leaker just like there is no evidence he was. Same goes for the DNC being involved.

So where is there evidence that "debunks" these claims? Since I have provided you proof of CNN reporting this, now you can provide me CNN's evidence that specifically "debunks" the claims of Seth Rich is the leaker and the DNC was involved.

And the PI having not seen the emails his anonymous source says exist isn't proof when it comes to CNN, because they haven't seen the Comey memo that an anymous source say exist, yet they continue to report it as fact.



Btw, at the end, how is Anderson Cooper going to mock an elected official for saying there's stuff circulating on the internet, when CNN allows Maxine Waters to come on, daily, and run wild with Russian anonymous source Internet rumors, innuendo and conspiracy theories.

Matter of fact, CNN journalists run wild with Russian anonymous source Internet rumors, innuendo and conspiracy theories. Let me guess. As long as it's negative towards Trump anything goes, correct? The whole network is a joke.
The Russian involvement story is backed by every US and western world intelligence agency. The Seth Rich conspiracy stories are all based on sources that have admitted they have no proof.

There is no question that Russia interfered in the election. The only question is if any of Trump's people were involved. There is also no question that Trump has many ties to Russia.
 
Well back to the OP. I tried to follow the string of tweets and still don't understand any of it. Was Philip Stevens starting it by saying negative stuff about UL and that is what Forde responded to? I am confused as are some others. But, Morgousky, please tell me you are not defending the Vietnam war? Next to attacking Iraq for 9-11 that was probably the dumbest war we ever got involved with. Plus, if you go to Vietnam now they are great people who love Americans and we lost! If you really and truly support our troops (easy words for people to say) than having our soldiers go off to die for nothing is not support. Thank Goodness for the Washington Post then and now. But, f-Forde.
Good Lord, we didn't attack Iraq over 9/11.
 
again, how did Russia interfere with anything? simply saying it doesn't have any meaning. but that is all you got. now, try arguing politics without being able to use the words racism and russia. but you can't Fuzz.that is all the media can cling to. and you can only quote what they tell you to believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
He should never had jumped in on that one. In general, a Soldier who has to brag or point out his/her awards or ribbons is probably the person who least deserved them. Being a Soldier is not something one must go around bragging about, as I was told when I was a young pup in the Army. "they will know if you are a leader before you tell them".
 
He should never had jumped in on that one. In general, a Soldier who has to brag or point out his/her awards or ribbons is probably the person who least deserved them. Being a Soldier is not something one must go around bragging about, as I was told when I was a young pup in the Army. "they will know if you are a leader before you tell them".

I've met military men who never spoke about it (my grandfather), and I've known men who enjoy talking about it. Some of them are extremely proud and later in life that's how it comes off to me. Just proud.

In this climate today, I don't think it's a reflection of the person necessarily anyway, more of a reflection of obligation to call these cowards what they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
The Russian involvement story is backed by every US and western world intelligence agency.
No, its not.
There is no question that Russia interfered in the election.
According to who, anonymous sources?
The only question is if any of Trump's people were involved
A question for idiots, maybe.
There is also no question that Trump has many ties to Russia.
Wrong again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT