I assumed the "**** the NY Times" story was meant to be a favorable piece.
Is it not?
Is it not?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
It's too much. Anyone who takes any of these hacks seriously is a brain damaged moron. 
You've been sniffing to much shit on the job, you should put a mask on or go back to teaching.
Oh, and if Comey does, in fact, think that "hug" was an attempt to publicly compromise him, then he's only proving that he truly is a fvcking paranoid nutjob.
Again, Pence would ignore this BS and it wouldn't linger.
Until something is really concluded you can't say there will be no impeachment. Who knows what could be out there that these people may fall into. Seriously to think nothing would be dug up is naive no matter how much of Trump thumper you are.
Until something is really concluded you can't say there will be no impeachment. Who knows what could be out there that these people may fall into. Seriously to think nothing would be dug up is naive no matter how much of Trump thumper you are.
And nutless Republicans continually ignoring this type of stuff is the reason it has gotten so bad. The Democrats and media feel they are above the law, and can do and say whatever they want because they know Republicans won't stand up to them, but instead just sit back, get punked and ignore it.
There's comes a point in time when you have to stand up and fight back. If Republicans tuck tail and allow Trump to be impeached over anonymous sources and rumors, then the Democrats and media will only be empowered more, get even worse, and will continue to use the same tactics on every single Republican candidate/president from here on out.
Yeah, the Republicans should just let the media and deep state do what it wants and ignore it. I'm sure all the problems would just magically disappear.
Tone is a subjective measure. What is the source?
Also, when virtually every news organization in the world is saying the same thing...there is probably a good deal of truth to those reports. Most adults have a pretty negative view of adolescents... Trump spends a lot of time acting like one. When he starts acting like an adult he will gain more respect. But as I've said before, Trump is his own worst enemy.
This couldn't be more false. They're not all independently reporting these stories. They're all piggy backing off of one single report from anonymous sources, then reporting it without independent verifying sources or if the information is true or false.
the source was Harvard.
and you are too clueless to think for yourself. the media works as a mouthpiece for one party....period. journalism has been dead for decades.
Journalists drink to much and are dumb...no shit, Sherlock.
http://www.businessinsider.com/journalists-brains-function-at-a-lower-level-than-average-2017-5
http://www.businessinsider.com/journalists-brains-function-at-a-lower-level-than-average-2017-5
No. If they are successful in running Trump, they'll be emboldened for a generation. Pence would just be the next guy wearing a bullseye. Which is why this "movement" has to be quelled - has little to do with Trump really. Saw a tweet today that the only constitutional crisis is the resistance to a peaceful transfer of power after a democratic election. About right.
Edit: sorry, probably an unnecessary post - I see the point I make was made repeatedly before I chimed in. I would note that the cartoonist for the Courier Journal, a true Bolshevik, in the weeks before the election was fingering Pence as the "true threat" to all that is holy. My guess was he simply didn't take DT seriously. Everyone learns at different rates....
Last edited:
He is an enemy only to traitorous organizations and morons like you who support them.
Welp, Alan Dershowitz of all people just slammed the door on the entire thing....I'm sure someone else just saw him on Tucker. Will post the clip when available.
Point was.....what statute has been violated or even ALLEGED to be violated? Name it. And "obstruction of justice" don't count, folks...specific statute please.
Said telling Comey to let it go, firing Comey for whatever reason he'd like (even if Comey was investigating him....which he wasn't), and (gasp) colluding with the Russians (which he didn't do) on the Wikileaks dump......no statutes or laws violated. All within the law.
Does anyone know laws that have been violated or have specifically been alleged to have been violated?
What is the crime?
Point was.....what statute has been violated or even ALLEGED to be violated? Name it. And "obstruction of justice" don't count, folks...specific statute please.
Said telling Comey to let it go, firing Comey for whatever reason he'd like (even if Comey was investigating him....which he wasn't), and (gasp) colluding with the Russians (which he didn't do) on the Wikileaks dump......no statutes or laws violated. All within the law.
Does anyone know laws that have been violated or have specifically been alleged to have been violated?
What is the crime?
It's either going to be evidence that Manafort or one of the other multitudes of advisors with ties to Russia coordinated the efforts of the campaign with Russian dissemenation of leaks (there's already timeline evidence of this) or bribery by means of financial gains for those advisors. I think Trump is too stupid or unable to keep his mouth shut long enough to be directly involved but it's a 'he should have known' kinda deal.
It is quite interesting what Trump is allowed to get away with vs Obama by you guys. Night and day. And quit acting like the media is out to get this guy, he's bringing it on himself. People are sick of this shit -- act like a freakin President is supposed to act. He thinks he's running a Hooters or something.
weird how nearly every one of those 'anonymous sources' turn out to be correct.
Spot on Bill. Half the political headlines on CNN.com end with "sources say" or some variant, and the other half are opinion pieces. Where's the beef?
name one thing that has turned out to be correct? we will all sit back and wait.
Watch the clip. He addressed this and put this false talking point to bed as well. It's not a crime. Might be dirty politics, but not a crime. Unless Manafort helped Russia, or whoever, hack the information it isn't a crime. Taking advantage of political information that someone has on your opponent isn't a crime. It happens dozens of times in any and every campaign.
Absolutely false. Do we really need to sit here and go through how many times they've not been correct? I can think of two, proven to be the case, major lies in the past week.
Name them and see. Bet I can match you tit for tat of one's that have been completely made up and/or false.
And considering this is the media we're talking about, the so called harbingers of truth, there shouldn't be a single example of a made up or false story, but there are many.
Member when Donald raped and/or assaulted dozens of women and our justice department let him run for president? That was crazy.
I'm all for dirty politics, been that way since day one. Just not sure sure why you wouldn't be bothered that the mud is coming from Russia.
Actually they aren't. Regardless of what the latest polls say about Trump's approval rating, those same polls also say that people who voted for Trump haven't wavered, and are still behind him just as they were on election day. Matter of fact, those same polls also say that if the election was held again today, Trump would beat Hillary again.
While we're on the subject, in the same polls, the Democrats have lost a lot of support. They're even less popular than Trump and the GOP. Only people who received lower approval ratings are the lying media. Since the election the Democrats have had zero message, zero policies, zero fixes to any issue, nothing. All they have is Russia, and that's what people are sick of.
BTW in the spirit of full disclosure I've only until recently avoided the Paddock like the plague.
But Bushy Flat Earth piqued my interest on his epic thread and now I'm sucked in. So I've probably missed a little in the first 1000 pages of this thread.
But Bushy Flat Earth piqued my interest on his epic thread and now I'm sucked in. So I've probably missed a little in the first 1000 pages of this thread.
The mud came from Wikileaks. We haven't seen a single shred of evidence that it came from Russia. First they said 17 intelligence agencies said so, then changed their story to three intelligence agencies. Assange denies it came from Russia. Members of the Senate intelligence committee have admitted there's no solid proof it came from Russia. You only know what you've been told.
T-Bickle, speak of this Russian mud. I'm curious about that because i havent seen one person show one bit of evidence
All that proves is that dogma is...dogmatic.
Midterms will be here before we know it. Guess the proof will be in the pudding. Curious to see how this Montana House race plays out.
Seth Rich leaked Hillary's emails. He got murdered. Just like a string of bodies that have dealt with the Clintons.
Plus Bill Clinton is a rapist
Plus Bill Clinton is a rapist
Hell man I wasn't in the room. Isn't the whole point of all these investigations to find that evidence?
I'm cynical enough to post dumb shit on a message board in a political thread. I'm just not cynical enough to think that every Republican and Democrat is a total POS with no other ulterior motive other than political gain. I actually believe some of these people want to see good for this country.
I haven't heard one person disparage Robert Mueller, and I for one will feel okay trusting that he might be able to come to a conclusion on this matter. Maybe I'm naive.
Not to mention, another very important point in all of this that keeps getting lost in the shit storm is the DNC refused to allow the FBI to investigate their servers. That's common knowledge. How does the FBI know that the severs were even hacked, much less who hacked them, if they've never even taken a looked at the severs?
Similar threads
