ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .






Thought this was well said:





"These cowardly morons don’t seem to understand that all their power and authority is little more than a figment of the political imagination—once the desire to believe in the judicial tooth fairy is gone, it is gone forever, and nothing will bring it back.

Wiser men with far stronger backbones understood this for centuries—they knew their power as an institution was entirely one of perception, given the institution’s lack of any real power to enforce its rulings against the two far more powerful branches of the federal government.

The Supreme Court controls no army and no bank account. Its police can barely keep people out of its own building or away from the homes of its members. How on earth will it enforce rulings without the force of money or arms? The simple truth is it cannot, and its smarter members—until recently, at least—understood the court’s unique challenge: how to enforce rulings against two institutions despite any real power to do so.

Those with brains and no fear of their own shadows knew this was only possible if the politicians and the people believed the courts had the necessary credibility and reputation to produce long-term deference to its decisions.

We are rapidly approaching the point where that is no longer the case.

And if Justices Tweedledum and Tweedledee insist on closing their eyes and sticking their fingers in their ears in the belief that if they can’t see or hear or the consequences of their own idiocy and cowardice then there won’t be any, then their only precious legacy will be the destruction of the very institution they’re allegedly so desperate to save."
In that case, Trump can just start ignoring the judiciary. Eff them. Roberts wants to be a coward, he'll back down to Trump as well.
 
Some of you guys think you are real tough, but I bet even @warrior-cat couldn't whip Tim Walz. He says he could kick most of our asses.







This Tim Walz, that waves like this...going to kick all the Trump Nazis ass







7c4wzhf2ojod1.jpeg
 
This is just stupidity. The judge is a federal judge. His order is legitimate, whether an appellate court deems it wrong or right. You're just lapping up the "activist judge" BS and this stuff about a supposed conflict of interest - it's catnip to you and your ilk. Trump has no business mobilizing his angry mob against the judicial branch. If he keeps it up, it will be something out of a third world dictatorship. But as I said, I don't think he's stupid enough to do that.
SCOTUS already ruled the judge has no authority.

What happens when a judge orders Trump to move our carrier group out of the Red Sea? Or orders Trump to pardon some murderers? Or orders Trump to sign a Congressional Act?
 
Many are bringing up the Andrew Jackson quote about Justice John Marshall when it comes to the judiciary: “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

Marshall infuriated Jackson by insisting that Georgia laws that purported to seize Cherokee lands on which gold had been found violated federal treaties.


GmWPmMhXwAAxMdz









Rep Ogles to Roberts: "James Madison and Thomas Jefferson disagree with you. So does the Constitution. We are going to keep the impeachments coming."

The same day Roberts made the statement, Rep Brandon Gill filed to impeach Judge Boasberg




 
Judiciary is playing with fire. Their desire to reverse this election and the will of the people is going to destroy the Constitution, because they are going to force people to choose between security and safety, or rule by unelected judges. It won’t be a hard decision.




" will not end well for the judiciary's public legitimacy."











"impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision" is pronouncing on when impeachment is legitimate.

The Chief Justice deciding to free-wheel comment on when it's legitimate for Congress to exercise its near-absolute check on the judiciary, because he didn't like the president's rhetoric.

Inappropriate."






 
This is a very true tweet. I’ve said this since the last Trump term. The ever- more aggressive actions from the left to disrupt a sitting administration’s term will cause counter-actions which are by necessity more aggressive. The pendulum swings will get wilder, and the Constitution is at risk.

Again, all because they cannot accept any actions that they don’t agree with. All because they believe they are superior to the people. All because they run the government as a patronage network.

 
DOGE derangement syndrome...



This reminds me of the damage, vandalism and destruction on Jan 6th.
Guess y'all think this is ok too. Or would some cops being beaten make it better for you??

Poor trolling effort today.
 
I know I’m always fighting the pro Israel crowd on this forum but how does someone see this and not see that we are owned by Israel?

The Justice Department and FBI announce a new task force to target Hamas over Oct. 7 attack

Why the hell are we focused on this? This should not be our government’s fight or how our resources should be used. We have enough shit to worry about on our own soil.

Just know that after the boomer conservatives are gone, the support for Israel will hit rock bottom from everyone but Jews and those who take money from their lobby.
Look, this is really something we're never going to fully agree on.

I'm staunchly on the side of keeping Israel as an ally. I don't buy the conspiracy theories that Israel is somehow running our government. I do believe we have a close relationship, and as the only democratic government in the Middle East, that seems like a very good decision. I also subscribe to the Biblical promise that those who support Israel will be blessed by God.

To answer your (rhetorical) question.

Iran is the head of the snake. It's obvious to anyone who has two brain cells to rub together that Hamas and Hezbollah are helpless without Iran's support and funding. And Iran has only been effective thanks to OBAMA'S funding. If we need to partner closer with Israel to undo that damage for the next few years, I'm all for that.

Furthermore, as I said, if you want peace in the Middle East, you have to have regime change in Iran. However that looks. The Houthis, Hamas, Hezbollah, they are run by Iran. They are the threat to peace. If we want to promote peace, we have to threaten Iran and take them out at the highest level. Israel can't do this by themselves. All the Arab countries for the most part have gotten in line with Trump to broker peace with Israel. The Persians need to be brought to heel to make this happen.
 

Newt Gingrich: There is no constitutional basis for these judges' 'radical' worldview​


Newt has the right idea. Congress needs to abolish at least some of the lower courts. Maybe just the courts that have been acting up lately. Trump flushes them out, Congress wipes them up.
 
Germans ain't feeling TruMusk either.
Tesla Chainsaw Massacre..... 🤣🤣🤣
FAFO

As of 2023 only 540,000 Germans bought an EV of any brand out of 84 million. That's .6%, so 99.4% of Germans in 2023 did not buy an EV of any brand. Cute thing about propaganda. It's really effective on the obtuse.
 
Because of a job his adult daughter has? Why don't you read up on what it takes to create an actual judicial conflict of interest (as opposed to a twitter one) - it is a very high bar. The same rationale applies to why J. Thomas does not have a conflict of interest with respect to the gifts he has received from wealthy friends.

The gift issue is totally different. If a judge, spouse, or a family member (within certain degrees of relations) have a financial interest in the outcome of the case; that must be disclosed. That is not optional.

Im not sure if this job is enough. However i know for sure the judge that forced usaid payments through had a direct conflict since his wife headed a nonprofit funded by usaid grants. That was a direct conflict and one of the worst i ever saw.
 
I want all these judges making these ridiculous rulings financial records investigated thoroughly by conservative groups. Not just their finances, their spouses, siblings, grown children...any way money could have been funneled to them through USAID or some other way. Including John Roberts.

This sh-t has to stop. Charlie Kirk: 'In case it wasn't explicit enough that the only two clauses of the left's constitution were "thou shalt have open borders" and "All American money will be sent abroad."










Again, they should follow every penny of that money to its end destination. Thats exactly how to beat all this. For some reason, they arent doing it.
 

While it obviously isn't going to change state-wide elections in California, still interesting to see a big surge in Californians registering Republican and Independent in just a few months. Could be the difference in certain districts adding a GOP congressman or two.

 
Last edited:
Because, for those who believe in the Bible....it's the Abrahamic Covenant.

Gen 12:1-3

1 The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you.
2 “I will make you into a great nation,
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.[a]
3 I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you.”[b]




When us boomer conservatives (who you constantly deride) are gone ..... there will be plenty of Christian conservatives to take our place.
While I respect your beliefs and your ability to practice them, US foreign policy should never ever be based on any religious covenants
 
Have had zero doubt Roberts has been compromised since the day he was sworn in. Didn’t I hear he was on Epstein Island multiple times??
He is compromised by the adoption of his kids. He somehow managed to adopt two Brazilian kids, who are white as a Crayola Crayon, by going through Ireland. Those two countries have the most strict adoption laws in the world. To adopt in Ireland, you have to live in country for at least a year. Neither he nor his wife did that. No one can figure out why he even involved a third country in the process, nor why his kids are listed as born outside of their birth country.

Prior to that he worked the Bush / Gore case and advised Bush prior to the appearance before the court. Not long after that he managed to pull off two miracle adoptions.

Past that it was rumored he was being blackmailed by a nation state before he was even nominated for the SC. I would love to see him impeached.

The Epstein thing I know nothing about.
 
Because, for those who believe in the Bible....it's the Abrahamic Covenant.

Gen 12:1-3

1 The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you.
2 “I will make you into a great nation,
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.[a]
3 I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you.”[b]




When us boomer conservatives (who you constantly deride) are gone ..... there will be plenty of Christian conservatives to take our place.
The Israel of today is not the Israel of the Bible. Not even close. Jews also believe Jesus is burning in hell covered in excrement. Just read the Talmud. They see Jesus as a heretic and us as animals. Also was Genesis written after 1948?

You guys have been so conditioned to support Israel all while they routinely sabotage this country. And no, you are wrong on this being a collective Christian issue especially among younger people. People in the future aren’t going to continue to support dying for Israel’s agenda.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mailman85
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT