She was like a deer in headlights when the teleprompter went out.
Lmao
I didn't see it but would've known they aren't going to take an entire city just because of this.
Last edited:
She was like a deer in headlights when the teleprompter went out.
Lmao
I didn't see it but would've known they aren't going to take an entire city just because of this.
Same way I do with many things, just use covid as the recent example. Knowing my belief is the best one supported and explained by the evidence. And having the courage and confidence to be secure in my belief.
The bandwagon fallacy encourages me to cut against the grain. It DOES not work on me pretty much anywhere.
But back to my point ... the courts would not listen to the evidence and so the facts were played in the court of public opinion. And why did the left's mantra change (all at the same time, which is weird) from "most safe and secure" to "well, not enough fraud to change things" to "yeah, there was a lot of fraud, but no victories in court"? Why did their mantra continue to change, move the goalposts, or lower the standard? [Because the public evidence does not support their conclusions.] You can try to convince me otherwise, but avoid bandwagon fallacies or appeals to authority please.
I'm waiting for the smoking gun. As is, none of those facts are proven to change any outcome. Everyone has different intuition. Polls 4 years after an event can be swayed by much that happened in-between & thus have no reliability to me.Fact: election laws were changed in an unconstitutional manner
Fact: ballots were sent out unsolicited
Fact: there were mules running ballots to unsecured and unmonitored drop boxes.
Fact: signature verification policies were so blatantly unenforced that even though we had the highest mail-in ballots in history (by the millions), the percentage of ballots tossed out due to that was as low as it’s ever been.
Fact: swing states shut down voting in an almost identical fashion with Trump leading.
Fact: Ga and Az audits and investigations found a plethora of irregularities/discrepancies along with missing/deleted data
There’s plenty more circumstantial evidence out there. You were never going to get some smoking gun, so best to use your intuition…..Like the majority of likely voters have done (per that Rasmussen poll).
Yet they [MAGA] still think they're somehow a majority.
You're not supposed to get me. It's not yours or anyone else here's role. I express my views and challenge a lot of bs (Plenty of ammo.). Do with it, or not, as you please.Great response but I honestly don’t get this VHcat dude.
I've heard 100's of times on here that Biden didn't get 81M votes. But no one has said how many he actually got. Surely the people who say it wasn't 81M but know the actual number or they wouldn't refute the actual numbers available. Or am I supposed to believe gut instincts or intuition?I get the question, “do you think JOE BIDEN got 81 million votes???”
Oh, there’s a catch for me. That shit comes from the foreign aid and other welfare they’re spending on other crap. Not in addition to all of their causes.There is absolutely no reasonable way to justify student loan forgiveness. I find the idea absolutely abhorrent, especially in a country 30 some trillion in debt.
Something has to be done about the media. The media is in the deep state liberal pocket. This is not what was intended.Media was really on one yesterday. CNN goes after Musk in typical bizarre CNN fashion and ABC was all about Jan. 6th.
CNN saying Musk posts propaganda and fake information is real rich.
"A summary of the attacks, which go on for a whopping four minutes:
- Musk likes Trump’s authoritarianism
- Musk constantly posts fake information
- Musk responds to Trump’s strongman tendencies
- Musk is visiting Butler because it is a quasi-religious site that made Trump “the target he always wanted to be"
- Musk “bought into the emotion” of the Butler assass*nation attempt
- Musk is using the Trump relationship to aid his companies that are under investigation
- Musk turned X into an echo chamber
- Musk posts propaganda on false claims
- Musk wants a job in Trump govt
- Musk seems to have too much time on his hands because he posts a lot of false information
- Musk posts too much to be able to run his companies and get anything else done
There’s throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks, and then there’s whatever this pile of hot garbage is.
Again — not a single mention of the work Musk is doing to aid hurricane victims, while the federal government flails."
ABC:
I've heard 100's of times on here that Biden didn't get 81M votes. But no one has said how many he actually got. Surely the people who say it wasn't 81M but know the actual number or they wouldn't refute the actual numbers available. Or am I supposed to believe gut instincts or intuition?
"This apartment is in the same county which received $6.1 mill in funding from the FEMA program that spent $1 billion on housing migrants:"
D’Souza did a fantastic job of showing the BS ballot drops and mules using geo tracking.The analogy is understandable. For me, the initial Covid push was believable and it looked as if many of our fears were well-founded. But, after a short while, as evidence was revealed, it became clear that those in charge were ignoring the evidence about impact, origins, etc.
I have read this thread off and on for quite some time now and have seen the claimed conclusions repeated, but unlike Covid, I do not see the progression of evidence toward those conclusions. I get the question, “do you think JOE BIDEN got 81 million votes???” All hypotheses start with a question and I think that is a good question; however, what has followed has not been convincing to me. Evidence of fraud and attempted fraud? Sure. The type of substantive fraud that would lead to Trump losing? Just haven't see it.
And, realizing the weakness of this aspect of my position, while admitting it is a factor, who is the most credible person claiming that cheating resulted in a fraudulent president not named Trump?
There are a number of influential voices who are pro-Trump or anti-Biden or just credible by reputation. Who would you point to to say THIS person lays out the case best?
With Covid and other “conspiracies,” at some point, people who did not originally believe a “conspiracy” admit they were wrong. Where are those people?
Covid, as a story, pales in comparison to the election was truly stolen. That conspiracy has germinated at the base and never attained traction toward the mainstream. Why is that?
Someone referenced a poll suggesting 62% of people think fraud was at play. What was the polling question? Because I believe fraud was at play. That is not the good question. The good question is did fraud impact the reported ultimate outcome?
If 62% of people believe that, really believe that, why is the outrage so confined?
nothing will ever be done about the media until enough people quit believing the media. we are far from that point right now.Something has to be done about the media. The media is in the deep state liberal pocket. This is not what was intended.
Thats what they looked like when they first moved in. Lets see how they look in a few weeks."This apartment is in the same county which received $6.1 mill in funding from the FEMA program that spent $1 billion on housing migrants:"
Gotcha. So either your brain automatically is in 100% lockstep with the ideologies of the GOP.The only item I can criticize is the feckless GOP leadership constantly caving in to the Democrats.
Newsflash from 'Modern Problems Require Modern Solutions' Department'Not me. As I've posted before, I don't have any student loans. I simply support it for my countrymen who aren't so fortunate.
They’re the least informed people, the most emotional, and the most hive-minded.We have to have a discussion about the destruction caused by their attachment to abortion.
while I’m sure we’ll announce within the next month we’re sending another few billion to Ukraine, Israel or Taiwan. It’s outrageous.
They cheated, you see. And will again. The whole idea that there was no evidence is an outright lie.
So you don't know.It was less than 81 million. You might want to look at the vote trackers and the big jumps that happened around 2:00 and 3:00 a.m. in the swing States.
Always a victim.Good to see Musk shaming publicly government officials into allowing private citizens to provide aid to NC.
Edit: hilariously I’m sure the narrative is going to be the federal government isn’t standing in the way of anything, even though it took Musk broadcasting their incompetence to his 200 million followers before they’d get out of the way.
Abortion has overtaken climate change as the undisputed #1 religion for women, especially college-educated white women. It’s insane. Also, “right wing ideology”? Just goes to show both how powerful the education/MSM are when it comes to pushing a message and he easy it is to brainwash women.We have to have a discussion about the destruction caused by their attachment to abortion.
He had 75,386, 224 votes from legal voters.So you don't know.
Mayorkis is one of the most competent people in the Biden regime if you judge by results. Every day he’s achieving a new Biden regime goal.
The only item I can criticize is the feckless GOP leadership constantly caving in to the Democrats.
Great response but I honestly don’t get this VHcat dude. Already seen him admit that he is sure there was some level of fraud but not to the extent it would affect the outcome. Huh!!!! If your committing fraud, your doing it to win. They had fraud in place in 2016 but wasn’t prepared for the level of support trump received and could not overcome it. They used mass mail in voting to be better prepared in 2020. I’m sorry but anyone that thinks Joe Biden got the most legitimate votes in history is an absolute moron.
Obama 2008 - 69,498,516
Obama 2012 - 65,915,795
Clinton 2016 - 65,853,514
Biden. 2020 - 81,283,501
Biden barely campaigned but managed 16 million more votes than Clinton just 4 years earlier and crushed the left most popular candidate ever in Obama by 12 million votes. That is a 25% increase in voter turnout in just 4 years 😂. If this shit doesn’t raise your eyebrows nothing will.
Yep, that DNCcp paid hack always shows up with some stupid strawman or whataboutisms.I hate the Krassenstein douchebags so much. These guys would literally eat pig vomit if the Democrats told them to.
Is pretty simple actually. The powers that be, including the GOP, do not want to let the general public know the election was in fact stolen through whatever process of fraudulent votes took place (although we all know it was mass mail-in voting). They don’t want the general public not having faith in the process. They all just looked the other way as the fraud took place whether they were happy about it or not. A good amount of the GOP is as corrupt as the left in their own right. This is certainly not a government for the people but a government for the government. It’s why Trump is not well liked amongst a lot of the brass, he is not one of them but an outsider disrupting the apple cart.The analogy is understandable. For me, the initial Covid push was believable and it looked as if many of our fears were well-founded. But, after a short while, as evidence was revealed, it became clear that those in charge were ignoring the evidence about impact, origins, etc.
I have read this thread off and on for quite some time now and have seen the claimed conclusions repeated, but unlike Covid, I do not see the progression of evidence toward those conclusions. I get the question, “do you think JOE BIDEN got 81 million votes???” All hypotheses start with a question and I think that is a good question; however, what has followed has not been convincing to me. Evidence of fraud and attempted fraud? Sure. The type of substantive fraud that would lead to Trump losing? Just haven't see it.
And, realizing the weakness of this aspect of my position, while admitting it is a factor, who is the most credible person claiming that cheating resulted in a fraudulent president not named Trump?
There are a number of influential voices who are pro-Trump or anti-Biden or just credible by reputation. Who would you point to to say THIS person lays out the case best?
With Covid and other “conspiracies,” at some point, people who did not originally believe a “conspiracy” admit they were wrong. Where are those people?
Covid, as a story, pales in comparison to the election was truly stolen. That conspiracy has germinated at the base and never attained traction toward the mainstream. Why is that?
Someone referenced a poll suggesting 62% of people think fraud was at play. What was the polling question? Because I believe fraud was at play. That is not the good question. The good question is did fraud impact the reported ultimate outcome?
If 62% of people believe that, really believe that, why is the outrage so confined?
Putting Bibles in schools wasn’t enough. Had to work a back room deal to funnel money to Donald Trump. Repulsive, but Im sure some of you clap on.
'Trump Bible' one of few that meet Walters' criteria for Oklahoma classrooms
Bibles endorsed by former President Donald Trump cost $60 each online, with Trump receiving fees for his endorsement.www.oklahoman.com