ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
God bless Norman Rockwell.

611ye2iF71L._AC_SX466_.jpg
 
You think the Bushes, Cheneys, Romney, McCain, Haley etc are "conservatives?"
You can pine for Desantis, or Cruz or whomever you believe passes your conservative litmus test, but the reality is Trump received more votes from republicans and it wasn't particularly close. So don't vote for him and let the leftists and globalists destroy this nation, destroy peace, destroy American sovereignty, and destroy the middle class. Seems rational.
You're making my point: People adoring & voting for Trump by & large aren't conservatives. We're a small minority anymore. Spend away, MAGA !! That's Trump's solution.

Yes, those others ex DeSantis aren't conservatives either. BTW, you don't read here much since you don't know who I'm voting for.
 
Well, what do you think?

You love posting about what’s provable (knowing damn good and well proving a fraudulent mail-in election is almost impossible with non-existent signature verification), but what does your brain/eyes/gut actually think happened?

This is the problem with people like you. You’d rather sit around and wait for the machine to hand the proof to you on a silver platter instead of trusting your eyes/brain/gut.

I got news for you. They ain’t gonna suddenly open up the books for us to examine
I've told you what I think. Lots of people are conspiracists based on their gut instincts. I do everything I can to resist non-facts based conclusions.
 
Last edited:
You may be shocked to know that there have been many historians who view the Atlantic Alliance as nothing more than a prop to the Anglo-American empire.

When you follow the money of the WW2 era, and you see how much of Hitler's backing came from both sides of the political spectrum in the US, you realize the depths of depravity of the elite all over this planet. You also realize how possible it might be that those people supporting him from here continued to support those like him in ideology after the war.

Maybe not because their ideologies were exactly the same, but because they shared the same lack of concern for human lives not their own, and that lack of concern is very profitable.

We weren't supposed to get into the war. It was a campaign promise of a corrupted politician who went back on his word by coercing/forcing Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor. Why? Why would he want to go back on that promise?

His campaign contributors demanded it.

Why?

Pretty simple. They backed Hitler, and Hitler had been winning. That meant more profits for them not just in terms of the weapons and other sales, but also in the stock and currency markets. Then Hitler decided to invade Russia, and everyone was like, "WTF?! NO!" They knew he was going to lose, and along with that they would lose much of their investment IN HIM.

The US had to enter the war to make sure that investment and its projected return didn't fall into Russian hands. As it turned out, a few of his backers lost money anyway. Among them was Prescott Bush, who had his assets and those of his financial institution frozen as part of an investigation by Joseph Kennedy into those funding Hitler. That family lost a lot of money and influence in that deal.

This country didn't get into WW2 because of the atrocities of Germany. They didn't do it to rescue Europe. The govt entered the war because of people invested in the outcome, and caring, patriotic Americans were shown an evil enemy they had no problem fighting. Most had no idea what was happening to the Jews, and to the political and religious enemies of the national socialist party. They just knew that Hitler, whom elites here helped to fund, needed to be stopped. And stop him they all did.

The fight that brought about the National Socialists gaining power was similar to what we saw in Russia and are seeing here now. Weakening and then federalizing the family. Pitting the poor against the middle class. Using propaganda and abuse of the purse and the citizens to foment fear and hatred, and clearly violence, as well as faking events and blaming them on political opponents.

My eyes were opened to all of this by a friend who had studied it, and seen it starting here in the 90s (but I think it might have have started in govt in the 50s or 60s). Some will just take the word of then current and even modern rewrites of last century's history (like those that have tried to rename the Bolshevik Revolution the October Revolution, not unlike them calling the incited bloodshed in Libya and such the "Arab Spring"...) I like to read all of the factual events and reason through them instead, since I've seen the omission or interpretation of those events change dramatically every decade or so.
 
Last edited:
When you follow the money of the WW2 era, and you see how much of Hitler's backing came from both sides of the political spectrum in the US, you realize the depths of depravity of the elite all over this planet. You also realize how possible it might be that those people supporting him from here continued to support those like him in ideology after the war.

Maybe not because their ideologies were exactly the same, but because they shared the same lack of concern for human lives not their own, and that lack of concern is very profitable.

We weren't supposed to get into the war. It was a campaign promise of a corrupted politician who went back on his word by coercing/forcing Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor. Why? Why would he want to go back on that promise?

His campaign contributors demanded it.

Why?

Pretty simple. They backed Hitler, and Hitler had been winning. That meant more profits for them not just in terms of the weapons and other sales, but also in the stock and currency markets. Then Hitler decided to invade Russia, and everyone was like, "WTF?! NO!" They knew he was going to lose, and along with that they would lose much of their investment IN HIM.

The US had to enter the war to make sure that investment and its projected return didn't fall into Russian hands. As it turned out, a few of his backers lost money anyway. Among them was Prescott Bush, who had his assets and those of his financial institution frozen as part of an investigation by Joseph Kennedy into those funding Hitler. That family lost a lot of money and influence in that deal.

This country didn't get into WW2 because of the atrocities of Germany. They didn't do it to rescue Europe. The govt entered the war because of people invested in the outcome, and caring, patriotic Americans were shown an evil enemy they had no problem fighting. Most had no idea what was happening to the Jews, and to the political and religious enemies of the national socialist party. They just knew that Hitler, whom elites here helped to fund, needed to be stopped. And stop him they all did.

The fight that brought about the National Socialists gaining power was similar to what we saw in Russia and are seeing here now. Weakening and then federalizing the family. Pitting the poor against the middle class. Using propaganda and abuse of the hpurse and the citizens to foment fear and hatred, and clearly violence, as well as faking events and blaming them on political opponents.

My eyes were opened to all of this by a friend who had studied it, and seen it starting here in the 90s (but I think it might have have started in govt in the 50s or 60s). Some will just take the word of then current and even modern rewrites of last century's history (like those that have tried to rename the Bolshevik Revolution the Spring Revolution, not unlike the "Arab Spring"...) I like to read all of the factual events and reason through them instead, since I've seen the omission or interpretation of those events change dramatically every decade or so.
We also allowed the British to be carpet bombed into hell until they agreed to turn over their naval bases across the globe to us. Then we entered on their behalf. We became the world's biggest navy in one big swoop.

For ppl to truly understand wwII they need to study wwI, the napoleon wars and the great war that happened before. Alliances changed and flip floped on a dime.
 



"Just got off the phone a Pastor in the midst of the flooding in TN/NC. He is in one of the most devastated locations.

He verified a few things about the situation:

- Almost all help is being done by private citizens, mainly churches.

- Private helicopters are flying in the vast majority of the supplies.


- Local Sheriffs are telling people to feel free to defend their property from looters by whatever means they have.

- WROL (Without Rule of Law) is happening in some areas, which means looting, robbing, and etc.

- FEMA's involvement has seriously complicated the rescue efforts.


- Local Sheriffs have threatened to arrest FEMA workers if they hinder rescue and aid work.

- The response to this tragedy has been massive and overwhelming. All from private individuals and local Churches."

Like it always is. We need to shrink the fed govt. It is not representing, nor serving, nor protecting the people and country.
 
We also allowed the British to be carpet bombed into hell until they agreed to turn over their naval bases across the globe to us. Then we entered on their behalf. We became the world's biggest navy in one big swoop.

For ppl to truly understand wwII they need to study wwI, the napoleon wars and the great war that happened before. Alliances changed and flip floped on a dime.

YES! WW1 and WW2 are actually WW2 & WW3. The 7 Years War was the first fought on multiple continents that included the people of this one. There are so many of these conflicts that shaped our founding and our ongoing struggle to try to prevent (for as long as possible) EXACTLY what they are doing to this country right now and have been building up toward for a long time.
 
I've told you what I think. Lots of people are conspiracists based on their gut instincts. I do everything I can to resist non-fact based conclusions.
Fact: election laws were changed in an unconstitutional manner

Fact: ballots were sent out unsolicited

Fact: there were mules running ballots to unsecured and unmonitored drop boxes.

Fact: signature verification policies were so blatantly unenforced that even though we had the highest mail-in ballots in history (by the millions), the percentage of ballots tossed out due to that was as low as it’s ever been.

Fact: swing states shut down voting in an almost identical fashion with Trump leading.

Fact: Ga and Az audits and investigations found a plethora of irregularities/discrepancies along with missing/deleted data

There’s plenty more circumstantial evidence out there. You were never going to get some smoking gun, so best to use your intuition…..Like the majority of likely voters have done (per that Rasmussen poll).
 
I don't think I have ever seen this video. Thomas Sowell is an amazing and brilliant man as many of us already know, and he doesn't disappoint here, damn what a response to being called that ugly slur. (any curse word or slur is bleeped out in the video)

His words always quickly and effectively cut through the opposing views. Like a knife through butter. The guy is a giant or as is mentioned a few times in the comments...'a national treasure. '


 
I don't think I have ever seen this video. Thomas Sowell is an amazing and brilliant man as many of us already know, and he doesn't disappoint here, damn what a response to being called that ugly slur. (any curse word or slur is bleeped out in the video)

His words always quickly and effectively cut through the opposing views. Like a knife through butter. The guy is a giant or as is mentioned a few times in the comments...'a national treasure. '


Would have been awesome if he could have been our first black president.
 
Would have been awesome if he could have been our first black president.

That would have been amazing. I was lucky to get introduced to Sowell's writings at an early age. My Dad got three newspapers growing up and sometime around 16 or so I started reading the political articles. He was one I usually stopped and read when I saw his name.
 
Last edited:
We also allowed the British to be carpet bombed into hell until they agreed to turn over their naval bases across the globe to us. Then we entered on their behalf. We became the world's biggest navy in one big swoop.

For ppl to truly understand wwII they need to study wwI, the napoleon wars and the great war that happened before. Alliances changed and flip floped on a dime.
Great seeing you again. Hope all is well.
 
Good to see Musk shaming publicly government officials into allowing private citizens to provide aid to NC.

Edit: hilariously I’m sure the narrative is going to be the federal government isn’t standing in the way of anything, even though it took Musk broadcasting their incompetence to his 200 million followers before they’d get out of the way.
 
Hey, there ya go. See I don’t criticize that. What I want is more of that.

I want more Democrats to cross the line. I want more Republicans to cross the line.

I’m not going to touch your communist line. That’s a bit cartoony.

However, none of that means I must vote for Donald Trump or that I must vote for Kamala Harris. In fact, I loathe the two party structure. I have no obligation to anyone but my family and friends.

Hey, there ya go. See I don’t criticize that. What I want is more of that.

I want more Democrats to cross the line. I want more Republicans to cross the line.

I’m not going to touch your communist line. That’s a bit cartoony.

However, none of that means I must vote for Donald Trump or that I must vote for Kamala Harris. In fact, I loathe the two party structure. I have no obligation to anyone but my family and friends.
I suspect you just like the feeling of the fence in your crack. Just kidding I know you are of course lying about being independent anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mash 2.4
Fact: election laws were changed in an unconstitutional manner

Fact: ballots were sent out unsolicited

Fact: there were mules running ballots to unsecured and unmonitored drop boxes.

Fact: signature verification policies were so blatantly unenforced that even though we had the highest mail-in ballots in history (by the millions), the percentage of ballots tossed out due to that was as low as it’s ever been.

Fact: swing states shut down voting in an almost identical fashion with Trump leading.

Fact: Ga and Az audits and investigations found a plethora of irregularities/discrepancies along with missing/deleted data

There’s plenty more circumstantial evidence out there. You were never going to get some smoking gun, so best to use your intuition…..Like the majority of likely voters have done (per that Rasmussen poll).
Great response but I honestly don’t get this VHcat dude. Already seen him admit that he is sure there was some level of fraud but not to the extent it would affect the outcome. Huh!!!! If your committing fraud, your doing it to win. They had fraud in place in 2016 but wasn’t prepared for the level of support trump received and could not overcome it. They used mass mail in voting to be better prepared in 2020. I’m sorry but anyone that thinks Joe Biden got the most legitimate votes in history is an absolute moron.

Obama 2008 - 69,498,516
Obama 2012 - 65,915,795
Clinton 2016 - 65,853,514
Biden. 2020 - 81,283,501

Biden barely campaigned but managed 16 million more votes than Clinton just 4 years earlier and crushed the left most popular candidate ever in Obama by 12 million votes. That is a 25% increase in voter turnout in just 4 years 😂. If this shit doesn’t raise your eyebrows nothing will.
 
Great response but I honestly don’t get this VHcat dude. Already seen him admit that he is sure there was some level of fraud but not to the extent it would affect the outcome. Huh!!!! If your committing fraud, your doing it to win. They had fraud in place in 2016 but wasn’t prepared for the level of support trump received and could not overcome it. They used mass mail in voting to be better prepared in 2020. I’m sorry but anyone that thinks Joe Biden got the most legitimate votes in history is an absolute moron.

Obama 2008 - 69,498,516
Obama 2012 - 65,915,795
Clinton 2016 - 65,853,514
Biden. 2020 - 81,283,501

Biden barely campaigned but managed 16 million more votes than Clinton just 4 years earlier and crushed the left most popular candidate ever in Obama by 12 million votes. That is a 25% increase in voter turnout in just 4 years 😂. If this shit doesn’t raise your eyebrows nothing will.
Bidenflation
 
Media was really on one yesterday. CNN goes after Musk in typical bizarre CNN fashion and ABC was all about Jan. 6th.

CNN saying Musk posts propaganda and fake information is real rich.




"A summary of the attacks, which go on for a whopping four minutes:

- Musk likes Trump’s authoritarianism
- Musk constantly posts fake information

- Musk responds to Trump’s strongman tendencies
- Musk is visiting Butler because it is a quasi-religious site that made Trump “the target he always wanted to be"
- Musk “bought into the emotion” of the Butler assass*nation attempt

- Musk is using the Trump relationship to aid his companies that are under investigation
- Musk turned X into an echo chamber
- Musk posts propaganda on false claims
- Musk wants a job in Trump govt
- Musk seems to have too much time on his hands because he posts a lot of false information
- Musk posts too much to be able to run his companies and get anything else done

There’s throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks, and then there’s whatever this pile of hot garbage is.

Again — not a single mention of the work Musk is doing to aid hurricane victims, while the federal government flails."




ABC:


GZFmCYdXcAAQ0ap
 
Same way I do with many things, just use covid as the recent example. Knowing my belief is the best one supported and explained by the evidence. And having the courage and confidence to be secure in my belief.

The bandwagon fallacy encourages me to cut against the grain. It DOES not work on me pretty much anywhere.

But back to my point ... the courts would not listen to the evidence and so the facts were played in the court of public opinion. And why did the left's mantra change (all at the same time, which is weird) from "most safe and secure" to "well, not enough fraud to change things" to "yeah, there was a lot of fraud, but no victories in court"? Why did their mantra continue to change, move the goalposts, or lower the standard? [Because the public evidence does not support their conclusions.] You can try to convince me otherwise, but avoid bandwagon fallacies or appeals to authority please.

The analogy is understandable. For me, the initial Covid push was believable and it looked as if many of our fears were well-founded. But, after a short while, as evidence was revealed, it became clear that those in charge were ignoring the evidence about impact, origins, etc.

I have read this thread off and on for quite some time now and have seen the claimed conclusions repeated, but unlike Covid, I do not see the progression of evidence toward those conclusions. I get the question, “do you think JOE BIDEN got 81 million votes???” All hypotheses start with a question and I think that is a good question; however, what has followed has not been convincing to me. Evidence of fraud and attempted fraud? Sure. The type of substantive fraud that would lead to Trump losing? Just haven't see it.

And, realizing the weakness of this aspect of my position, while admitting it is a factor, who is the most credible person claiming that cheating resulted in a fraudulent president not named Trump?

There are a number of influential voices who are pro-Trump or anti-Biden or just credible by reputation. Who would you point to to say THIS person lays out the case best?

With Covid and other “conspiracies,” at some point, people who did not originally believe a “conspiracy” admit they were wrong. Where are those people?

Covid, as a story, pales in comparison to the election was truly stolen. That conspiracy has germinated at the base and never attained traction toward the mainstream. Why is that?

Someone referenced a poll suggesting 62% of people think fraud was at play. What was the polling question? Because I believe fraud was at play. That is not the good question. The good question is did fraud impact the reported ultimate outcome?

If 62% of people believe that, really believe that, why is the outrage so confined?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT