ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%

  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%
  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Dionysus444 said:
You just said it was emblematic of the Roman Empire and anti-western in the same post. The Roman Empire IS the entire “west”. You should never speak again.
Click to expand...
More real-world action for your viewing pleasure.

GY1o7-NXIAQdu94
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: UK_fan_41102, ukalum1988, screwduke1 and 12 others
bcw1029 said:
No Ukraine questions, energy questions, or questions about the port strike.

Garbage robotic low-iq moderators.
Click to expand...

The one moderator was offended when she attempted to fact check Vance and HE fact checked her. She could be heard making some snide comment like “thank you for explaining the lawl” and then you could see Nora Macdonald, or whatever her name is, hitting the panic censor button, followed by a smug “no one can hear you.” WRONG AGAIN! We could hear and hear that it was a DEBATE ABOUT FACTS that NBC was censoring.

Pathetic and childish moderators. They just looked stupid in that exchange. We don’t want an actual debate to be censored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer Sosay, bcw1029, IdaCat and 20 others
Vance proved he is another rising rock star in the R party. He destroyed a very competent Walz, who isn't dumb, but is definitely out of his league in big boy politics. He needs to stay in his lane, much like Beshear. Sometimes, you're only meant to go so far in this league. To think Walz could be one step away from being in the Oval Office is rather frightening.

It has now simply laughable how the moderators act from the liberal media stations....they don't even pretend to be neutral in these debates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer Sosay, UK_fan_41102, screwduke1 and 9 others
hmt5000 said:
I have heard it took her 7 times to pass the Cali bar exam. One lawyer said that if you don't pass it on the first try you do DUI and divorce cases in the Valley.
Click to expand...

When you take any bar, you have no clue as to whether you passed. You may THINK you passed, but that notice will make you sweat. Today, you can look online. Back in the day, I remember going to my mailbox daily waiting for that letter. No one wants to take the bar twice. I know some very smart successful people who had to take it 2-3 times. Not everyone tests well. 6-7 times is extreme, if that is true.

A certain celebrity lawyer in Kentucky took the Kentucky bar multiple times before passing. If making money is your standard, he now makes millions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1, Blue Bigfoot, SDC888 and 1 other person
Vance’s dance on abortion was pathetic, IMO. Walz acted like Kentucky was extreme. There is no law more extreme than Minnesota’s that Walz signed and Harris praised. In Minn, you can kill your baby the day before she is born. Look at her as a newborn baby and know that in Minnesota, you could have chopped her up in the womb THE DAY BEFORE. SAME BABY!! That IS INSANE and that is what Harris wants for the whole country. She thinks that madness is retiring Roe, probably because she does not understand Roe.

Vance was afraid to point out Minnesota’s pathological law, because he was afraid of the issue and probably thinks they still have a shot in that state. It was a low moment, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat, ukalum1988, gamecockcat and 2 others
Did anyone catch Wald holding his ear like he had an ear piece in? I saw it and thought it was an odd thing to be doing at the time, but haven’t seen anything here or on X.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Caveman Catfan said:
Vance’s dance on abortion was pathetic, IMO. Walz acted like Kentucky was extreme. There is no law more extreme than Minnesota’s that Walz signed and Harris praised. In Minn, you can kill your baby the day before she is born. Look at her as a newborn baby and know that in Minnesota, you could have chopped her up in the womb THE DAY BEFORE. SAME BABY!! That IS INSANE and that is what Harris wants for the whole country. She thinks that madness is retiring Roe, probably because she does not understand Roe.

Vance was afraid to point out Minnesota’s pathological law, because he was afraid of the issue and probably thinks they still have a shot in that state. It was a low moment, IMO.
Click to expand...


What do you say when your opponent is flat out lying about what he signed into law? He pressed Wald multiple times, and Wald repeatedly lied. Not really much you can do but hope the viewers educate themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luv2hit63, dezyDeco, screwduke1 and 9 others
cole854 said:
Vance proved he is another rising rock star in the R party. He destroyed a very competent Walz, who isn't dumb, but is definitely out of his league in big boy politics. He needs to stay in his lane, much like Beshear. Sometimes, you're only meant to go so far in this league. To think Walz could be one step away from being in the Oval Office is rather frightening.

It has now simply laughable how the moderators act from the liberal media stations....they don't even pretend to be neutral in these debates.
Click to expand...

Walz is completely stupid, fake, a liar, and really a weird person to boot. He was about the best pick the gop could've hoped for other than in MN.

Vance killed it in this debate as predicted. He is amazing in front of the cameras in any exchange setting. Walz better be glad the debate was rigged and even then it was a slaughter.

Vance really set the stage for himself and it will be interesting to see whats next for him after this election. I definitely dont like the thought of him governing because he flip flops so much, who knows what he really believes. That said, i think he entrenched himself in the next election cycle one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: exemjr, 55wildcat, LineSkiCat14 and 4 others
Bill Cosby said:
What do you say when your opponent is flat out lying about what he signed into law? He pressed Wald multiple times, and Wald repeatedly lied. Not really much you can do but hope the viewers educate themselves.
Click to expand...

You tell the listener that Walz and Harris are extremists. That Trump favors democracy and varying state laws, while Harris wants to federalize the extreme murderous law of Minnesota.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: screwduke1, AustinTXCat, paulcalhoun and 1 other person
bigblueinsanity said:
Vance really set the stage for himself and it will be interesting to see whats next for him after this election. I definitely dont like the thought of him governing because he flip flops so much, who knows what he really believes.
Click to expand...

I disagree w/ this. He doesn't shy away from past comments, and explains his current views very well if he has changed his mind....as we all do. He lays out why he feels the way he does now with reasoning. That isn't a flip flop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco, screwduke1, blubo and 3 others
cole854 said:
I disagree w/ this. He doesn't shy away from past comments, and explains his current views very well if he has changed his mind....as we all do. He lays out why he feels the way he does now with reasoning. That isn't a flip flop.
Click to expand...

He doesn't shy away from them but theyre still there. If he flips back, but embraces another flip, that doesn't make it ok.

There is currently no way to tell how he would govern and thats a major problem. If someone is running for the presidency, they need to have demonstrated actionable substance which tells you who they are. He doesn't have that yet, at least not beyond being an incredibly good debater and opportunist.
 
Caveman Catfan said:
Vance’s dance on abortion was pathetic, IMO. Walz acted like Kentucky was extreme. There is no law more extreme than Minnesota’s that Walz signed and Harris praised. In Minn, you can kill your baby the day before she is born. Look at her as a newborn baby and know that in Minnesota, you could have chopped her up in the womb THE DAY BEFORE. SAME BABY!! That IS INSANE and that is what Harris wants for the whole country. She thinks that madness is retiring Roe, probably because she does not understand Roe.

Vance was afraid to point out Minnesota’s pathological law, because he was afraid of the issue and probably thinks they still have a shot in that state. It was a low moment, IMO.
Click to expand...
How was his stance or dance pathetic? He clearly pointed out that Minnesota law allowed for a botched abortion survivor to not receive life saving care and that was barbaric. Really the only thing different I would have said is that killing an innocent child should not be labeled “healthcare”, let’s call it what it is which is murder. We can have a conversation about the extreme circumstances that make up a very small percentage of abortions but killing an innocent child out of inconvenience for whatever reason will always in fact be murder and never healthcare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL, warrior-cat, dezyDeco and 7 others
cats2010 said:
How was his stance or dance pathetic? He clearly pointed out that Minnesota law allowed for a botched abortion survivor to not receive life saving care and that was barbaric. Really the only thing different I would have said is that killing an innocent child should not be labeled “healthcare”, let’s call it what it is which is murder. We can have a conversation about the extreme circumstances that make up a very small percentage of abortions but killing an innocent child out of inconvenience for whatever reason will always in fact be murder and never healthcare.
Click to expand...

It was a dance. He and Trump fear the abortion issue and have struggled to find a spot on the issue that looks comfortable. Walz can deny the botched abortion claim, but he cannot deny the pro abortionist law that permits late third trimester abortions. Most people reject abortions in the late third trimester, even those who don’t understand science or who lack morality. The Minn law is scary ugly and what Dems do when they have total control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
Caveman Catfan said:
Prove me wrong:

Of the 4, Trump, Harris, Walz, and Vance, by FAR, no debate, Vance portrays as the smartest, best communicator, and most presidential on the debate stage.
Click to expand...

Smartest is debatable w/ Trump, who is brilliant.

Communicator...yes, Vance.

Most presidential....this is meaningless. Obama was presidential, but a disaster. However, we have seen Trump in presidential form and it is intimidating and he is a leader.

No one else can pull this off.

wa1fmzlkbozy.gif
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: the nail at the foul line, Lost In FL, TheFrontRunner and 6 others
cole854 said:
Smartest is debatable w/ Trump, who is brilliant.

Communicator...yes, Vance.

Most presidential....this is meaningless. Obama was presidential, but a disaster. However, we have seen Trump in presidential form and it is intimidating and he is a leader.

No one else can pull this off.

wa1fmzlkbozy.gif
Click to expand...

Well, Trump may be the rare person who feels the need to “pull that off.” That is a meaningless move that may excite the sycophant, but holds no other productive purpose. Being presidential matters. It is a flaw of Trump that he is not. The fact he is not is the main reason why this race is close. He would have never lost to Joe Biden if he was presidential.

Think about that. We would not have suffered through the past four pathetic years if Trump was presidential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018, Catman100, ukalum1988 and 3 others
Caveman Catfan said:
Being presidential matters. It is a flaw of Trump that he is not. The fact he is not is the main reason why this race is close. He would have never lost to Joe Biden if he was presidential.

Think about that. We would not have suffered through the past four pathetic years if Trump was presidential.
Click to expand...

Sorry....this makes zero sense and I completely disagree. Moving on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL, screwduke1, BBUK and 2 others
bigblueinsanity said:
Lol reading these ap fact checks. One said vance incorrectly linked rising home costs to "immigrants" when its actually low housing inventory.

Lmao why is there low housing inventory? Such bs biased msm as usual.
Click to expand...
Agree. Supply and demand. You and I both mentioned as much in other related posts.

MSM loves running cover for the ongoing invasion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018, dezyDeco, IdaCat and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

flacat22

AND THATS WHY THEY PLAY THE GAME!!! GO CATS!!

Replies
25
Views
1K
Rupp Rafters - Basketball Forum
flacat22
flacat22
funKYcat75
  • Poll

Best Christmas Movie - Round Two - Game 7

Replies
3
Views
555
The Paddock - General Discussion Forum
AshWilliams
AshWilliams
T

David Lynch and Mulholland Drive

Replies
9
Views
560
The Paddock - General Discussion Forum
UnfrozenCatfanLawyer
UnfrozenCatfanLawyer
M

Pope will right the ship

Replies
25
Views
842
The House of Blue
jboliv01
jboliv01
Mime-Is-Money

Koby Brea Appreciation - Great game Saturday

Replies
12
Views
623
The House of Blue
jhol
J
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back