ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Fine the families requested Trump there. No problem. But that's no excuse for shooting a political ad in a restricted area - if that is against the law/rules.


I actually think every single political ad should include footage of all the tombstones of the soldiers who’ve died in the forever wars fought for the profit of the establishment. Don’t really give a shit if those same politicians write rules saying you can’t show america the seas of tombstones of the men and women who died for their profit.
 
Seeing liberal women in my social media posting vague and subtle memes today about how people are supposed to change, and how it’s a good thing. Quite clearly trying to set the tone for just accepting Kamala’s flip flopping around, which is putting it mildly.

Folks, I’m sorry. This is not an evolution of thinking. She’s a presidential candidate that is now lying through her teeth and saying anything to get elected. And frankly, in an ironic sense, she’s being pretty transparent when she is making pointed statements that her “values have not changed.”

Yeah, we know, Kamala. That’s code for: “I still hold every position I’m on record for over the last 5+ years, but I’m just lying my ass off now to fool enough people to vote for me. Don’t worry, I’ll go right back to my real intentions if I’m elected.”
 
Remeber when Muslims were murdering people around the world, and then "Clock Boy" ripped an alarm clock out of its original setting and then stuffed it into a briefcase and brought it to school to elicit a scared response while saying "I INVENTED A CLOCK", and then Obama was like "Cool clock, Ahmed" and invited him to the White House?

AP_250782557912.jpg


The left are the worst.
 
I actually think every single political ad should include footage of all the tombstones of the soldiers who’ve died in the forever wars fought for the profit of the establishment. Don’t really give a shit if those same politicians write rules saying you can’t show america the seas of tombstones of the men and women who died for their profit.
When they or their son hasn't been, it is much easier to send someone to war. The Vietnamese people were at war long before we got involved. There was a huge graveyard in Phu Bai. While driving by, I thought we would never get to the end of it. Tiny white crosses as far as the eye could see.
 
Are you guys taking issue with the government mandating coverage for any procedures? Or IVF specifically?

I don’t think government should be as involved in healthcare as it is. Certainly don’t think there should be “insurance” coverage for elective procedures.

But if the government is going to incentivize anything, helping the population grow organically, with children conceived by people willing to stick to all the vitamin and shot regimes, and go through the IVF process seems like a net positive for society.

Could always vote democrat, probably end up with the same IVF result once Kamabla copies the policy, with the added benefit of federal “protection” of abortion up until the baby dies on its own after delivery.
Yeah, I noticed I got some laugh emojis on my post you responded. I was actually being serious as I am opposed to IVF, notwithstanding the realization that some people rely on this method for having a child.

IVF is essentially embryo farming. If IVF was a one-for-one procedure I would be much less opposed to it, but in the process, multiple embryos are ultimately destroyed for every successful gestational pregnancy. I'm also concerned about the potential for genetic manipulation.

I was also dismayed at Trump's lobbying for the expanded abortion referendum on the Florida ballot. I always believed his "pro-life" credentials were very suspect, and his recent statements prove what was always suspected but overlooked. For all of Mike Pence's many faults, his Christian beliefs undergird his political views and he helped keep the Trump administration focused on pro-life values. I'm still open pending additional data, but I don't get the same level of assurance from JD Vance.

The conundrum for me and others who feel the way I do is whether to vote for the proverbial lesser of two evils (Trump) or vote minor party / write-in vote in protest. Trump will almost certainly win Indiana without my vote anyway.
 
Increase birth rate. We are just below replacement. We need to have babies and families in order to be an actual nation in the next 20 years.
2.1 is roughly replacement birthrate.
1.62 is roughly the 2023 rate

The US was last regularly at replacement rate back around 1970. Prior to the introduction of The Pill in 1960 we were around 3.0. We nudged slightly above replacement around 2006 but have declined again. What were the benefits of having kids in 2006?
 

More on the Marines who died in Afghan during Biden/Harris debacle of a withdrawal. Mother of a dead Marine called into a radio show.... I once again dare a liberal member on here to just listen to what they say.
Biden is a worthless POS. Worst POTUS of all time! EAT SHIT, LIBS!
 
Yeah, I noticed I got some laugh emojis on my post you responded. I was actually being serious as I am opposed to IVF, notwithstanding the realization that some people rely on this method for having a child.

IVF is essentially embryo farming. If IVF was a one-for-one procedure I would be much less opposed to it, but in the process, multiple embryos are ultimately destroyed for every successful gestational pregnancy. I'm also concerned about the potential for genetic manipulation.
I have friends who went through IVF. The doctor told the mother-to-be that they had 6 embryos. How many did she want implanted? All of them. 1 was born.
 
Yeah, I noticed I got some laugh emojis on my post you responded. I was actually being serious as I am opposed to IVF, notwithstanding the realization that some people rely on this method for having a child.

IVF is essentially embryo farming. If IVF was a one-for-one procedure I would be much less opposed to it, but in the process, multiple embryos are ultimately destroyed for every successful gestational pregnancy. I'm also concerned about the potential for genetic manipulation.

I was also dismayed at Trump's lobbying for the expanded abortion referendum on the Florida ballot. I always believed his "pro-life" credentials were very suspect, and his recent statements prove what was always suspected but overlooked. For all of Mike Pence's many faults, his Christian beliefs undergird his political views and he helped keep the Trump administration focused on pro-life values. I'm still open pending additional data, but I don't get the same level of assurance from JD Vance.

The conundrum for me and others who feel the way I do is whether to vote for the proverbial lesser of two evils (Trump) or vote minor party / write-in vote in protest. Trump will almost certainly win Indiana without my vote anyway.


Understood. Not that my opinion matters, but I think your position is far more well reasoned and logical that that of lefties who want to plant an arbitrary date in the sand at which they can no longer kill babies.

Our entire medical system is ****ed, thanks to our government. Our entire food system is ****ed, thanks to our government. Many women injected experimental gene therapy, thanks to our government. All of those issues are negatively impacting fertility, so I don’t think it’s a bad thing for the government ease the way towards towards pregnancy for women who want to bring kids into the world.

I’d imagine many women going through IVF have suffered miscarriages or other issues. Some embryos being discarded in the ultimate pursuit of life, which may alleviate untold emotional suffering for parents, may be a net positive for the world.
 
Yeah, I noticed I got some laugh emojis on my post you responded. I was actually being serious as I am opposed to IVF, notwithstanding the realization that some people rely on this method for having a child.

IVF is essentially embryo farming. If IVF was a one-for-one procedure I would be much less opposed to it, but in the process, multiple embryos are ultimately destroyed for every successful gestational pregnancy. I'm also concerned about the potential for genetic manipulation.

I was also dismayed at Trump's lobbying for the expanded abortion referendum on the Florida ballot. I always believed his "pro-life" credentials were very suspect, and his recent statements prove what was always suspected but overlooked. For all of Mike Pence's many faults, his Christian beliefs undergird his political views and he helped keep the Trump administration focused on pro-life values. I'm still open pending additional data, but I don't get the same level of assurance from JD Vance.

The conundrum for me and others who feel the way I do is whether to vote for the proverbial lesser of two evils (Trump) or vote minor party / write-in vote in protest. Trump will almost certainly win Indiana without my vote anyway.
Fortunately Indiana will be fine without your vote, and I understand and respect peoples views and principles on the issue based on religious reasons or whatever, (and I'm guilty of a laugh emoji because I thought you were being sarcastic.) However, in the broader sense, is this an issue of principle so strong it's worth putting the final nail in the coffin for the destruction of the Country over?
 
Guys, I have to confess something. I bought into the idea that Kamala was incompetent and "stupid" and unpopular, but I really didn't think she was truly stupid until that interview last night. Honestly at this point I have to conclude that she truly DID blow her way to the "top" of her profession. I doubt she actually even passed the bar. She can't even memorize talking points. She is a total IDIOT. She got the questions from CNN in advance, brought written notes, brought Tim Jong Walz with her for support, and she still tanked the interview. She's a MORON.

CNN is doing her a disservice by not grilling her. She will get destroyed by Trump in their debate. And she'll back out of the other two. You hear that, TROLLS? She's going to QUIT the other debates!
I agree that Kamala does not come across as very astute, to say the least. However, I think it may be something in addition to that. I've read/heard some folks close to her/on her staff in CA and in DC that say she's just plain lazy. Would show up at meetings when AG in CA 30 minutes late, look bored and leave early. From what I've read, some of her staffers have been extremely disappointed that she won't listen to the daily briefing, opting to have a 1-page summary instead, will not honestly prepare for a speech/debate/interview, just won't do much of anything. Her campaign speeches are almost word for word the same at every stop. Almost all of her communications are very strictly scripted, on a teleprompter, etc. Her handlers do NOT allow her to speak off the cuff because they know she's too lazy to know any real facts and the word salad that spews forth in lieu of any real content is ripe for derision. Of course, being black and a woman, no one is going to call her out without severe consequences. But, moving from Sleepy Joe who has spent 1/3 of his 'presidency' on vacation to Kamala who won't do the work seems like a path fraught with danger.
 
Last edited:
I agree that Kamala does not come across as very astute, to say the least. However, I think it may be something in addition to that. I've read/heard some folks close to her/on her staff in CA and in DC that say she's just plain lazy. Would show up at meetings when AG in CA 30 minutes late, look bored and leave early. From what I've read, some of her staffers have been extremely disappointed that she won't listen to the daily briefing, opting to have a 1-page summary instead, will not honestly prepare for a speech/debate/interview, just won't do much of anything. Her campaign speeches are almost word for word the same at every stop. Almost all of her communications are very strictly scripted, on a teleprompter, etc. Her handlers do NOT allow her to speak off the cuff because they know she's too lazy to know any real facts and the word salad that spews forth in lieu of any real contact is ripe for derision. Of course, being black and a woman, no one is going to call her out without severe consequences. But, moving from Sleepy Joe who has spent 1/3 of his 'presidency' on vacation to Kamala who won't do the work seems like a path fraught with danger.
Why does this sound almost identical to the staff critique of Trump?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knottcobred
That graphic is very confusing. It shows Harris winning the popular vote by a landslide and the Electoral College narrowly, but the number under Trump says he's narrowly ahead in the Electoral College. Two different numbers. The WWW needs editors.
If Trump wins Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada, (like 538 is predicting), Kamala can't be ahead in the EC (narrowly or otherwise)
 
And if she can't do any better than THAT in a spoonfed, pre-taped interview, she should definitely start looking for another job.

Normally I would say that Dumb and Dumber is the perfect nickname for those two, but it's impossible to know who is "Dumber"
 
Yeah, I noticed I got some laugh emojis on my post you responded. I was actually being serious as I am opposed to IVF, notwithstanding the realization that some people rely on this method for having a child.

IVF is essentially embryo farming. If IVF was a one-for-one procedure I would be much less opposed to it, but in the process, multiple embryos are ultimately destroyed for every successful gestational pregnancy. I'm also concerned about the potential for genetic manipulation.

I was also dismayed at Trump's lobbying for the expanded abortion referendum on the Florida ballot. I always believed his "pro-life" credentials were very suspect, and his recent statements prove what was always suspected but overlooked. For all of Mike Pence's many faults, his Christian beliefs undergird his political views and he helped keep the Trump administration focused on pro-life values. I'm still open pending additional data, but I don't get the same level of assurance from JD Vance.

The conundrum for me and others who feel the way I do is whether to vote for the proverbial lesser of two evils (Trump) or vote minor party / write-in vote in protest. Trump will almost certainly win Indiana without my vote anyway.
Good lord…cut off your nose to spite your face.
 
Why does this sound almost identical to the staff critique of Trump?

Because it's true? Shes obviously woefully under prepared and/or just stupid. Good thing she was hot at one time.

She's so stupid i question if she actually passed the CA bar which is supposed to be very difficult. Knowing what we know now, its just as likely they fixed it for her.

She must've been one helluva beast in the sack to challenge, and maybe win, for the highest office in the land based solely on sexual favors.

If there was a wh0re Olympics, shed have more gold medals than Michael Phelps.
 
And if she can't do any better than THAT in a spoonfed, pre-taped interview, she should definitely start looking for another job.

Normally I would say that Dumb and Dumber is the perfect nickname for those two, but it's impossible to know who is "Dumber"
@HymanKaplan, we've known each other for a long time...but that's ^^^ not fair comparing those two dolts to Dumb and Dumber in any way. They've already proven that they are.

Now, carry on with destroying the simpletons on here. 👍 It's fun to watch.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's ever been said whether or not she passed California's bar exam, which is suppossed to be one of the toughest. I guess she could have passed in another state that has reciprocity with California.

I don't think they have reciprocity iirc.

I dont think California's bar exam is harder, it requires a marginally higher score but has more morons applying.

Now that might be the case. It might be like va too where you don't have to actually graduate law school to sit. Seems it has some quirk iirc
 
Can someone explain to me how in the hell polls work in the days of cell phones?

I'm not answering a call that I don't know who it is. Are the people that answer calls from strange incoming numbers a reliable group for predicting the president's election? We aren't in 1976 anymore.

No wonder the liberals always poll better. Shut-ins with cell phones are way more likely to answer the calls than people that have things going on.
 
Last edited:
They'd never admit it, but liberals probably wish the election would be tomorrow before any more days pass where Kamala continues to not really show anything. The interviews (or lack there of), the flip flopping, the overall sense of Kamala just not being cut out for this, etc.

Said it weeks ago, but her approval peaked when they pulled Biden. It's done nothing but trickle off since then.

Dems need another trick of their sleeve or this might be over by Columbus day.
 
I don't see why libs can't just call it what it is. She's an empty suit. She literally stands for nothing, only the things that will get her ahead at the time being.

Progressives called her a cop for her DA record, but if the advancement and money was flowing the other way, she'd unlock every cell in California.

She's the definition of falling forward.
 
 
It doesn’t.
Sure it does. The laziness. The lateness. The refusal to read briefs. The accusation of stupidity. The word salad. Trump said he didn't come down to the office because he was working in the residence. Sure. On his golf swing: he had one of those indoor golf thingies installed. The writer and fellow New Yorker Fran Leibowitz famously said of Trump, "You do not know anyone as stupid as Donald Trump. You just don't."
 
Last edited:
. Knowing what we know now, its just as likely they fixed it for her.
Yeah. They had that whole see-the-future machine going on. The same one that Barak Obama had. We didn't want to let you all know we had it, but you guys are so sharp, you wheedled it out of us.
 
Sure it does. The laziness. The lateness. The refusal to read briefs. The accusation of stupidity. The word salad. Trump said he didn't come down to the office because he was working in the residence. Sure. On his golf swing: he had one of those indoor golf thingies installed. The writer and fellow New Yorker Fran Leinowitz famously said of Trump, "You do not know anyone as stupid as Donald Trump. You just don't."
Guess they haven’t met Harris.
 
I don't see why libs can't just call it what it is. She's an empty suit. She literally stands for nothing, only the things that will get her ahead get her head for the time being.

Progressives called her a cop for her DA record, but if the advancement and money was flowing the other way, she'd unlock every cell in California.

She's the definition of falling forward.
I fixed it for you...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT