ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
"But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones, because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."
So analyze it. What does this mean? He's talking about Pence. He's talking about using the mob to apply pressure to "the weak ones"(Pence who said no to his coup plot) to get him "to take back our country."(acknowledge his fake electors and gavel him reelected when he wasn't)
 
Honeymoon is over...lol

The official crowd size was listed at 109 participants, including media as Kamala read from a teleprompter at the event.

95f288c9e97aaaf9.png
I'm not sure what you were trying to link, but all I see is what appears to be a School Board, or maybe a small town council meeting.

Just FYI
 
Last edited:
Many Mexican Americans are conservative as well. Shhhhh! Don’t tell anybody.
Let’s see what those women think about the federal government pushing for full term abortions.
Enough that you're predicting Trump wins Hispanics in the fall like Rasmussen had in that poll? Yeah, didn't think so.
 
Dion, why are you so bent out of shape about polls that you don't think are accurate? If you make it up to Lexington this Fall, I'll give you a care package (Golden Teachers), you could use them.
I'll be at opening kickoff, just like every season. I hate Rasmussen because they're conservative partisan shills. So shitting on their obvious lies is fun. They're dumb and they're wrong. They deserve to be mocked and ridiculed. I can go over the entire video if you'd like and point out exactly how he's wrong in each section. Can do a big, numbered list of all the ways he's an idiot.
 
This is a hell of a listen to regarding the Big Pharma and food companies (insane that former tobacco companies bought food companies and then transitioned their scientists to work on making processed foods more addictive), the constant conflicts of interest. Our entire system is based on keeping people sick and never tackling the root cause.



Like how does it make sense Coca Cola and Cadbury are significant donors to the ADA?

JohnKBA, like did you eat rocks or something as a kid? Why are you so dumb, man? There's nothing incorrect about this video that you didn't watch. It's literally a pharma lobbyist and a Stanford-educated surgeon.
 
Last edited:
Nothing against Vance. But have said from the very beginning that Trump should have pick Haley as his VP. He wins or loses with independents votes. She understands the talking points of what to say and what not to say and how to say things. A crazy question, but is there any way Trump could split VP duties and have two. Haley with foreign and Vance with domestic? Not make that exclusive, just their primary focus but sharing VP duties to give both the experience.

Hailey would undermine him at every turn. She doesn't give him additional votes. She's the Harris of the R party, except more of an intelligent RINO than Harris is an intelligent working class girl. If Haley was VP and Trump won the election, they'd eliminate him within 3 months of the inauguration, if not the day of
 
I don’t think that will happen if Trump loses and there is no funny business like in 2020. Now, if Trump wins, I can see mass riots by the left. I can also see the lefties in the senate and house trying to deny him from assuming the office. Then the right will rise up.

If Trump wins there will also be stonewalling by the R party in congress and they will drag their feet on everything because of the rampant rinos. Still better than giving the keys to China within the first 6 months like a Harris regime would.
 
JD Vance absolutely WRECKED Dana Bash on CNN a few days ago. The guy is UNFLAPPABLE. Trump made a good choice. He's going to eat Walz for lunch in their debate.
Yep. The media response to that choice tells you all you need to know. The worst people in DC hate him and that's a good thing.. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Bigfoot
I highlighted the part were it said "people" and "shall not be infringed". That seems really specific. So if I'm building a gun the constitution says you can't do shit.
It absolutely does not. The Constitution specifies a range of rights that cannot be infringed. That doesn't include manufacture, and the Feds have long restricted the kinds of weapons manufacturers can make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan the caddy
It absolutely does not. The Constitution specifies a range of rights that cannot be infringed. That doesn't include manufacture, and the Feds have long restricted the kinds of weapons manufacturers can make.
OK so you would agree there are legitimate things we can do curb illegal immigrants to vote... Right?
 
It absolutely does not. The Constitution specifies a range of rights that cannot be infringed. That doesn't include manufacture, and the Feds have long restricted the kinds of weapons manufacturers can make.
The first amendment doesn't mention the internet or telephones. Do Americans have a first amendent right while on the phone or on the internet?

Supreme court ruled porn is protected by 1st amendment, yet it's not mentioned in the 1st amendment.... Is it possible you see limitations where you want while seeing none where you need it?
 
When you consider what the current administration did to this country with sky high inflation, increased cost of gas and food, and flat out enablement of an massive invasion of illegal aliens…

And then compare this to how the country was humming along for 3 years under Trump pre-pandemic…

And then you consider what has now been laid out as Harris’ economic plan, along with her other positions she is on record for having…

Frankly this election shouldn’t even be in doubt. It really ought to be a Reagan-like landslide for Trump if most of the electorate was even mildly sensible.
 
Maybe, but that Rasmussen poll had him winning them 48/46. That ain't happenin.
It could. He came very close to winning several counties on the Texas-Mexican border, in 2020, which are about 95% or more Hispanic, and might have increased his popularity with that voting base since then. I wouldn't bet on 48% to 46% for Trump, but it's not totally out of the question. It's definitely a concern, for the Democrats both in the long term and short term, that Hispanics are eventually going to start voting 50/50 at best for Democrats in future elections.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT