Good lord....this group of liberals is frightening. And Anderson Cooper may want to tone it down on the botox and makeup....very mannequin looking.
Leave to Deee to try and down play the negative impact of Obama Care. Rah! Rah! Leader to the end.
Last I saw, we were second in the world in spending per pupil, and 28th in results. With a track record like that, not sure I understand your reticence about letting the government take over anything....Yea can't think of anything worse than wanting government in charge of healthcare. That is terrifying and just not smart from the voters standpoint. Absolute gold for the government. The goldest. That's worse than government in charge of education.
pro tip: Never publicize the fact that you governed Baltimore, MD
Hillary is controlling this debate. She continues to go beyond her time limit with little opposition by Cooper. Every question they ask the others about what she had possibly done wrong were not answered directly to or about her. It has been almost all about what they would do not what she had done. They are either too scared or this is just a mock debate to set her up for her run. What a joke of a debate. Democrats should be ashamed.
![]()
OK, Willy: would you?
These Democratic candidates are a complete disaster. Agree, if a Republican cannot win this election they may never win again.
The Democratic Party, the party of inclusion, has only old, white candidates to choose from.
I am one of the people who supported the ACA. I think healthcare should be offered by our government. That being said, the way it was put in has been crap. I was more of the Romney idea, where markets compete, it drives prices down, people pay what they can afford. Originally, it was a republican based idea .Basically, by more people paying into the insurance system, prices should drop.
They have not. It has been the complete opposite. It has been a disaster. We are paying more for our healthcare with less coverage. If anyone knows an answer, I am for it, but what is going on now, will not work.
It was actually refreshing to see Bush's plan against the ACA. I have not read the specifics, which I need to do, but this alone, would be a reason I would vote for him.
Good read as a follow-up to what we have been talking about on here. Here in KY one of the co-ops went belly-up last week that had 51k participants:
In a new working paper, Wharton economists Mark Pauly, Adam Levine and Scott Harrington estimate how much better or worse off the non-poor uninsured are under ObamaCare. They measure the cost of the plans, the benefits of consuming pre-paid medical care and out-of-pocket payments without obtaining coverage. They conclude that, “even under the most optimistic assumptions,” half of the formerly uninsured take on both a higher financial burden and lower welfare, and on net “average welfare for the uninsured population would be estimated to decline after the ACA if all members of that population obtained coverage.”
http://www.wsj.com/article_email/obamacare-bear-market-1444778110-lMyQjAxMTE1NDEyNDkxOTQ2Wj
In other words, ObamaCare harms the people it is supposed to help. This is not a prescription for a healthy, durable program.
Markets have also been disrupted by a cascade of failures among the ObamaCare co-ops that were intended as a liberal insurance utopia. These plans were seeded with billions of dollars in federal start-up
loans and were supposed to work like the credit unions or the electric collectives of the Depression era. No profits were allowed, advertising to introduce new products was restricted and industry executives were barred from management. As it turns out, attempting to outlaw expertise and incentives tends not to produce good results.
The implicit Fannie Med-type taxpayer backstop let the co-ops gamble on undercutting their competitors to steal market share, pricing premiums well below cost. They figured that any mistakes could be papered over with a bailout from Uncle Sugar.
Among the 23 co-ops chartered for 2013, four have already gone insolvent in Louisiana, Nevada, Iowa and New York. Another 11 have received warning letters from the feds putting them on “enhanced oversight” financial probation until their balance sheets improve. More are likely to fold in the coming months.
.......
The Kentucky Health Cooperative, the second largest U.S. co-op, is also insolvent and being wound down at year’s end. The plan scooped up three of four enrollees on the Kentucky exchange by running a premium-to-expense ratio of 158% in 2014—that is, for every $1 in premiums it collected it incurred a 58-cent loss. That’s $146.5 million down the tubes.
We can start by decoupling your employer from your healthcare tax benefit. I have a great job, and I functionally have 2 healthcare options. In a market economy (lol), that's appalling. There is no competition because your employer controls the few options you have. Why don't we just give company dollars to spend at the company store in the company town while we're at it? Thanks, WWII wage freezes and inertia. IIRC, McCain addressed this issue a bit in 2008, and there's a couple of think tanks that have proposed reform, but how this is not front and center of any healthcare reform discussion is baffling. We're literally using the tax code to stifle competition and creating unintended consequences like Hobby Lobby (which is a legal, moral, and intellectual travesty).
Or, if the tax issue is fixed, we can go with a good ole' 1) I work, 2) employer pays me, and 3) I purchase my own health insurance from a slew of competing (good for consumers!) options.
It's very rare for the same party to win three times in a row. Hasn't happened since Reagan/Reagan/Bush. However, we've never seen the media like it is today or seen brainwashing like we see with today's youth.
BTW, they really need to up the voting age to 25.
Interesting: every major media outlet seems to think Hillary won the debate but every online Dem voter poll I have seen shows Bernie Sanders winning.
I thought the most significant point of the night was when the Chipmunk declared that she never made a decision on Keystone until she made a decision on Keystone.
It made me think "well what IS a decision?" I'll bet the answer depends on what the definition of "is" is.
She's the Democrats' Nixon for sureIs it a stretch to think shes the most corrupt, dishonest presidential candidate in modern history?
So if history repeats itself it's Jeb! or bust in '16.Heard a crazy stat that I thought was BS but after taking a glance, I don't think it is…
No Republican has been elected president since 1928 without a member of the Bush family or Richard M. Nixon on the GOP ticket.