Yet Jerry and others like him will continue to support/donate/vote for Dems.
don’t think Sein is voting Biden.Yet Jerry and others like him will continue to support/donate/vote for Dems.
A LOT of reform Jews who historically vote Dem won’t be voting Biden from the feedback we’ve been getting.don’t think Sein is voting Biden.
He’s pretty much had it.
No. A statue of Thomas Jefferson or George Washington isn't representative of a group of people. The Pride mural is specifically to celebrate the LGBTQ community. You can't commit a hate crime against George Washington.
I think she calls that "bringing a ruckus".
You need to look deeper at the polls. Trump gets voters that other pubs just aren't getting. I'm not sure any of those others when with mail in voting. You have to have massive turnout to compete with vote harvesting.Sucks that Trump is nominee. I will vote for him but he's literally the only guy that wouldn't of won in a walk. Vance, Haley,, Scott. Win in a route vs Biden or Newsome. Even Dezantis with zero charisma routes them. In moat important election of my 50 years we go with the 1 guy that's a coin flip vs a corpse. Okay Vikek would likely lose to the corpse. But every single vp canidate but vivek wins likely easily.
But gop would rather take the guy that has a legit chsnce to lose over a almost sure win.
Look I like moat of what Trumps platform is but this is a MUST WIN to the 1000th degree. And voters chose they wanted a barn burner rather than a slam dunk. Sorry I do t think Trump is nearly worth the risk we took
Haley definitely wouldn't win. 30% of Trump voters just aren't voting for a warmonger like her.Vance, Scott or Haley beat Biden in a stomp not seen in at least since Obama McCain.
I admit yall democrats are the best at dirty politics and are better at the game too bad you suck at running things tho.
“Just assume”? I normally wouldn’t say anything but you talk down to everyone on here.
I cut and paste directly from Moore v. Harper which directly addressed the ISL theory @Lost In FL was espousing. "Congress" as used in the Constitution, specifically here the First Amendment, refers to all government apparatus. Including the Louisiana State Legislature.
She would win decisively.Haley definitely wouldn't win. 30% of Trump voters just aren't voting for a warmonger like her.
Lol, no. No one in the majority of conservatives is voting for Tits Romney.She would win decisively.
Overwhelming majority of that 30% votes for her, every Never Trump Republican votes for her, and a lot of moderates/lean Dems that are voting on the economy vote for her.
@Lost In FL asked:Read the case and tell me how it has anything to do with the First Amendment. Thanks.
So I responded with:The Louisiana law ... what part of the Constitution does it violate? Which Article or Amendment?
To which he gave us this gem that the contention is over:Umm the First Amendment?
I cited the relevant section of Moore v. Harper, which is a recent ruling that addresses this exact contention, what the meanings of the terms used in the Constitution are. It held they referred to the entire government law-making apparatus involved in the process. This avenue circumvents the 14th that's been under attack by the current court.HAHAHA. I KNEW you would not disappoint. Ok ... let's break this game film down ...
First amendment says ...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." (emphasis added)
The Louisiana law ... is the Louisiana state government "Congress"? (short answer is no - so the short answer is ... the Louisiana law DOES NOT violate the Constitution)
Oh we’re crumbling, no two ways about it. It’s all by design.'We're currently spending more money on the interest of our debt than we can afford to spend on the defense of our country."
Every single time that's happened, those empires have crumbled (British, France, etc.)
........and all the one's putting it in motion are insulated with massive wealth and power.Oh we’re crumbling, no two ways about it. It’s all by design.
lol.
She took 43% in the NH (swing state) primary against a former president when the primary was already pretty much decided anyway.
Keep arguing if you want, but you are wrong.
Dude used an outlier and SDC just squashed it 😂lol.
She took 43% in the NH (swing state) primary against a former president when the primary was already pretty much decided anyway.
Keep arguing if you want, but you are wrong.
That gas bag couldn’t hold 10 to 15 percent . But is gonna win with non- Trump supporters. The TDS is deep with these people.But that was a unique situation: literally had democrat voters voting her openly admitting they'd never vote for her in the general/
And that was by design. Then she couldn't hold her own state and it was doneso
@Lost In FL asked:
So I responded with:
To which he gave us this gem that the contention is over:
I cited the relevant section of Moore v. Harper, which is a recent ruling that addresses this exact contention, what the meanings of the terms used in the Constitution are. It held they referred to the entire government law-making apparatus involved in the process. This avenue circumvents the 14th that's been under attack by the current court.
Who the hell are we?A LOT of reform Jews who historically vote Dem won’t be voting Biden from the feedback we’ve been getting.
Biden's Amerika ... amirite Sam?Another cop killed defending all citizens, even LIBS that call them Pigs and vomit up other bile.
"Unnamed and no photos".......heard that one before.
Examples cited in Moore I linked are older than that. Regardless, this is all an obfuscation as it doesn't matter when the First was applied only to states, what's good for the federal goose is good for the state gander. If LA's law were federal @Lost In FL wouldn't've made that argument as it's clearly unconstitutional. Trying to use a 'it doesn't apply to the states' loophole is silly both philosophically/morally and legally as it's been settled for over a hundred years, as you pointed out. Any citizen of the United States of America has the rights listed in the Bill of Rights, no matter what state they live in(unless they do something to lose them of course, which isn't relevant for this discussion, but someone would still take issue).Again, D-Sus, show me where the case speaks to the application of the First Amendment to the states. You said that the first Amendment referred to the states when it states “Congress” and I said that it was not until the 20th century before that was realized. You used Moore to suggest I was wrong. Prove it.
False.Almost all of Haley's votes came from actual democrats, remember. They were rolling in dems and re registering them as repub in same day registrations so they could vote for her in the primary. She received almost no support by actual Republicans.