I posted quite a bit on here recently about my changed belief that vaccine mandates may have been too intrusive on bodily autonomy in some instances. If I say the government can force a vaccine but can't force a
I am being hypocritical. Can't have it both ways.
You may wanna reconsider your stance as well to avoid the same hypocrisy.
I also have never said I am for abortions... I'm just not for the government making that decision for a woman or child. Best left to them, their doc and their God.
Leave me out of it.
Look, I semi agree with that, leave the government out, but I just can't condone what I consider killing a undeveloped innocent human with a unique fingerprint, DNA all that.
But, yes, that is between a woman, the man THAT IMPREGANTED HER, and their God.
I hate the idea that if a man wants an abortion, woman says nope, he's on the hook for 18 years.
But if she wants the opposite, he's shit out of luck.
That's just wrong. In that case, she should waive any future child support from him, and raise it herself.
And if she doesn't want it, but he does, shouldn't there be a certain fairness there? Can't he raise it alone with no support from her? (I get the damage done to the body in childbirth, etc, etc, and I am not talking about life or death health type issues for the mother.)
Disclaimer, I have no children (that I know about,lol), nor ever had a woman abort my child (that I know about, lol)