ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
You understand that the implication of your post was that Israel had burned children not as part of the consequences of war, but as an attack on children, like Hamas.

By saying children have been caught as collateral deaths to war; you have just included every nation and people. 🤦‍♂️
What is the difference you’re trying to draw here?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
OK, so WTF is a Skiliosexual? they literally have a flag for that and Kroger decided, that it's worth having in their inventory. and WTH is a Neutrois? There's a flag for that, and Polisexual, and agender.

What the actual phuch is this BS. These are literally made up nonsense terms.
I need a flag for Skilletsexuals. Love any food cooked up in a skillet.
 
Is raping and baking people to death permitted by international law?

If terrorism was not protected in Gaza, there would be peace.
Again, what peace? There can never be peace while the apartheid state exists. Apartheid is inherently violent. If Hamas never launched another rocket there would still be no “peace”.
 
Probably for the same reason Trump didn't take a plea deal instead of having a porn star on the witness stand recounting spanking the former President on the ass with a rolled up magazine with his face on the cover.
https://www.gbnews.com/politics/us/donald-trump-trial-stormy-daniels-hush-money-magazine-spank

Trump didn’t take a plea deal because sitting through the laughably corrupt show trial, which will be overturned on appeal, helps his arguments, and pleading guilty to a nonexistent crime would be stupid.
 
Again, what peace? There can never be peace while the apartheid state exists. Apartheid is inherently violent. If Hamas never launched another rocket there would still be no “peace”.

Wrong. The two state option was something Israel agreed with. It was Hamas that shot that down. Have a state that is not attempting to kill Jews and there would be peace.
 
Not really. My point is exactly on point....right on cue. The truth is just too painful for you right wing nut jobs to acknowledge.

You got your ass handed to you in that post because it was 100% idiotic. So much so, he took time to post here and call you out. Further, you double down by posting something that is a complete non sequitur. Google it G-School if you don't know the meaning.
 
Wrong. The two state option was something Israel agreed with. It was Hamas that shot that down. Have a state that is not attempting to kill Jews and there would be peace.
Israel agreed to leave the occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem and set up a contiguous Palestinian state? When was this? Oh, never? Gotcha.
 
You got your ass handed to you in that post because it was 100% idiotic. So much so, he took time to post here and call you out. Further, you double down by posting something that is a complete non sequitur. Google it G-School if you don't know the meaning.
😂😂😂😂 My argument was completely facetious (Google if you don't know the meaning) and meant as a deliberately obtuse (Google if you don't know the meaning) example of providing an example of extremist abortion ideology that was actually the antithesis (Google if you don't know the meaning) of my actual beliefs.
Sadly, you were too dense as well to get the satiric irony (Google if you don't know the meaning) of my spermicidal post.
Over. Your. Head.
 
You said:

They're both children being burned in a war. What's the difference?

This seems obvious. Children dying, anyone dying, in war is awful. Big difference, however, between targeting kids (torturing them in front of their parents before you kill them in front of their parents, sticking live babies in ovens, etc.) and being in a war where an attack kills the unintended.

Children throughout the ages have died because of their physical proximity to bad people. It’s not the same as targeting kids to torture and murder, regardless how you try and spin it.

The fact your asked twice is embarrassing for you.
 
Israel agreed to leave the occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem and set up a contiguous Palestinian state? When was this? Oh, never? Gotcha.

This is you pretending something for the sake of acting like the poster was wrong. Definition of a strawman.

Israel, the U.S., AND the PLO agreed to a two-state solution. Hamas did not. You side with Hamas over the U.S. the PLO, and Israel. Gotcha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
This seems obvious. Children dying, anyone dying, in war is awful. Big difference, however, between targeting kids (torturing them in front of their parents before you kill them in front of their parents, sticking live babies in ovens, etc.) and being in a war where an attack kills the unintended.

Children throughout the ages have died because of their physical proximity to bad people. It’s not the same as targeting kids to torture and murder, regardless how you try and spin it.

The fact your asked twice is embarrassing for you.
They're intentionally choosing to fire on those children though. The bombs don't drop themselves.
 
😂😂😂😂 My argument was completely facetious (Google if you don't know the meaning) and meant as a deliberately obtuse (Google if you don't know the meaning) example of providing an example of extremist abortion ideology that was actually the antithesis (Google if you don't know the meaning) of my actual beliefs.
Sadly, you were too dense as well to get the satiric irony (Google if you don't know the meaning) of my spermicidal post.
Over. Your. Head.

You know how all of that could be avoided, right? Hire me as your ghost writer. With my wit, and writing skills, you would no longer have to worry about your posts being misconstrued.
 
You said, “what’s the difference?”

If you don’t see the difference, you are ill.
There is no difference. I mean if you stacked them all up one pile of dead children would definitely be taller than the other, but I don't think that's what you meant. Being burned alive is being burned alive. Whether in an oven or a tent. Again, what is the difference?
 
There is no difference. I mean if you stacked them all up one pile of dead children would definitely be taller than the other, but I don't think that's what you meant. Being burned alive is being burned alive. Whether in an oven or a tent. Again, what is the difference?

You are ill.

Or just as stupid as others claim you to be. Congrats.
 
This is you pretending something for the sake of acting like the poster was wrong. Definition of a strawman.

Israel, the U.S., AND the PLO agreed to a two-state solution. Hamas did not. You side with Hamas over the U.S. the PLO, and Israel. Gotcha.
An Israeli settler extremist is who killed Rabin tanking the Oslo Accords. Yet you say it was all Hamas. Wonder why?
 
I'm not saying it's good. Just that it's true. The people who follow political minutiae like those in this thread are a minority. If you want a more informed electorate we should make education a priority rather than an also-ran. But that'd whittle away the Republican base of low educational attainment voters so of course we can't do that...
GPZyK17a8AEXErc
 
I wore one in public places during the height of the pandemic. Once there was some herd immunity built up and I had gotten vaccinated, I was done with it.
I still wear one occasionally in the doctor's office out of courtesy towards others like when I had a really bad cough/upper respiratory infection this past winter. No sense in spraying my mucus out into the air if it can be avoided. I will wear one for others more than for myself.

Last sentence.

Pathetic pandering virtue signaling.
 
You know how all of that could be avoided, right? Hire me as your ghost writer. With my wit, and writing skills, you would no longer have to worry about your posts being misconstrued.
You're one of the half on here that remind me of my Republican friends/family that I enjoy debating with. Even when my brother (who is hard right) and I argue over these things, I usually come away gaining some insight into his views and at the end of the day....agree on waaay more than we disagree on... even if we refer to each other lovingly as idiots.
The other half remind me more of someone that might blow up a federal building and I'd probably nod my head in agreement with anything they said if I was actually talking to them in person. 😂😂😬😬
 
The whole world is laughing at us. Iran is at the door step of Nuclear Weapons, China is infiltrating America,

LIBS: "Yeah, but Trump"

Mortifying stupidity.
I don't think they are laughing at us so much as losing respect for us over our extreme political divisions and pathetic choice between Dementia and Demented for President.
 
Does anyone else find it ironic Dion will spend days arguing about Gaza Babies dying, and yet be pro-abortion, and rabidly so?
Because a fetus isn't a baby. The mother exists already as an individual entity with rights. She has control over what to do with herself. When a fetus is birthed and becomes its own individual person then legal rights are conferred onto it and it gains status equal to the pre-existing mother's. Not before when it is attached and part of the mother.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT