Gonna win for the 3rd time in November and send you libs straight to the gulags!
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Trump knows the things people actually care about.
Last edited:
Resident libs on this board love killing babies.
All those loons are full of themselves.
They do not OWN the building. They lease it from a developer. They deduct RENT. Whoever owns the building collects the likely longterm lease and depreciates the bldg. You cannot deduct the construction cost like you do your light bill. Gawd.
Kroger is in strip centers too. They dont own the building or center. It is unwise for a company to own their building inside the business. Creditors cannot get the building that way.
I thought this was a deep fake at first.
It went down EXACTLY like I said it did.
Why the hell would you buy the land and invest in building a grocery store in order to pay rent on it?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Publix aims to own, not rent, supermarket real estate
Publix is on its own shopping spree Publix continues to load up on real estate. The state’s dominant grocer now owns 25.9 percent of its stores, up from 22.9 percent at the end of 2014 and from jus…
www.palmbeachpost.com
"The company on Friday announced plans to build a 46,000 square foot supermarket"....In Lexington.
Publix announces second location planned for Lexington
Fifth store planned to open in Kentucky
spectrumnews1.com
A fully developed piece of land/building subject to a lease with a credit worthy client is an attractive opportunity for certain REITs among other buyers, and the sale/leaseback is a way to monetize the value for the tenant op co.
You're trying to explain calculus to someone who failed See Spot Run.
I go to restaurant once a week with golf buddies. Ice Tea has gone up to $3.75! I started ordering water this week. I add the savings to the tip.
True. But you are missing the entire context of the conversation.
Lecter was saying that Publix only rented and didn't have to invest in land or buildings as part of their expense portfolio in relation to their profit margins.
Basically saying rent was the ONLY expense in start up costs. 🤣
5000 responding to me, post #652,478: “I almost think he banged your grand daughter.”
You're clueless as hell just like Lecter. 🤡
Fetch Fido.....
Publix aims to own, not rent, supermarket real estate
Publix is on its own shopping spree Publix continues to load up on real estate. The state’s dominant grocer now owns 25.9 percent of its stores, up from 22.9 percent at the end of 2014 and from jus…
www.palmbeachpost.com
I thought McDonald's always offered any size drink for $1.00 That's hardly the "massive markup", but it sounds to me less like a cost thing and more of a convenience thing so they don't have to maintain the dispensers. It's also to prevent drink theft. People walking in off the street and sneaking drinks. They also said they are leaving it up to the individual owners and franchisees. The Coke Freestyle machines are much easier to maintain than the old style dispensers, mainly because they are linked to a Coca-Cola database and product inventory is tracked. Shipments of product are automatic and some of the maintenance and system updates can be handled remotely. but if it is a money issue for Franchisees to offer drinks for $1.00 they could easily raise that to $1.25 or $1.50 and not too many would blink, but this isn't the time to be doing that considering all the other price increases they've taken heat for.
The issue is fast food restaurants are seeing now is the decline in dining room occupancy. Most fast food establishments are operating at 70-75% or more drive-thru business. New builds are getting a lot smaller. You're seeing restaurants that once could seat upwards of 60-80 guests or more now going with 30- 40 seat prototypes.
I’m guessing a glass of iced tea costs the restaurant about 8 cents to make.
Are you trying to equate that with when jameslee wished rape on a granddaughter?
Maybe he should have said, “almost think he banged your above-age granddaughter, wife, mother, s.o. or life partner.”
Your ignorance is vast. They are buying EXISTING buildings that they are already in as tenants.... They are flipping the script to become landlords in a very depressed commercial real estate market. They are not BUILDING those. READ. On the 75% they do not own you can certainly ask them the stupid question above..."Why the hell....." They would, like me, laugh in your face. Stay in your lane.It went down EXACTLY like I said it did.
Why the hell would you buy the land and invest in building a grocery store in order to pay rent on it?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Publix aims to own, not rent, supermarket real estate
Publix is on its own shopping spree Publix continues to load up on real estate. The state’s dominant grocer now owns 25.9 percent of its stores, up from 22.9 percent at the end of 2014 and from jus…www.palmbeachpost.com
"The company on Friday announced plans to build a 46,000 square foot supermarket"....In Lexington.
Publix announces second location planned for Lexington
Fifth store planned to open in Kentucky
You really need to talk to an accountant assuming you can understand much of anything. You do not read well or comprehend. From your link:
Publix is on its own shopping spree
Publix continues to load up on real estate. The state’s dominant grocer now owns 25.9 percent of its stores, up from 22.9 percent at the end of 2014 and from just 10.7 percent a decade ago, according to an annual report released this week.
Simple math...it does NOT own 75% of the stores. I would assume that a smart company like Publix is acquiring the real estate in a separate company. Also Publix causes foot traffic in a center. It is a smart strategy in their case to AS IT STATES IN THE LINK acquire the ENTIRE center. They then become the landlord for all the other tenants who want to cluster near the Publix. They charge higher rents. For a real estate developer, that is what happens when you land a national account like Publix. You can land better adjoining tenants who pay more /sqft.
Why do companies/ Publix lease? Because in 10 years when they want to put a Super-Publix with whatever new business venture they want to get into, they can leave that site and move down the street to the hot part of town into the upgraded facility. Plus tax reasons. Depreciation is like 39years. You cannot deduct the cost of the building like you apparently think they do. If they build/own a new store for say...$15,000,000 they can only deduct depreciation. Less than $400K per year for 39 years. If they lease they deduct the rent monthly. Accounting is way over your head. There are hundreds of variables and tax ramifications in the decision for them to acquire real estate but I like their apparent strategy of buying the entire center, not just their store. They no doubt have a separate LLC that holds the property. Not sure how an ESOP works with that strategy.
Last edited:
I was just answering your question.
The rest of your post is hilariously nonsensical. You are stringing words together you think sound good, but in reality are nonsensical to anyone with a base level understanding of financial statements.
*checks McDonald’s app for price of a large coke at the nearest location*
$2.69
Probably even higher in various locations/states.
I am currently trying to sell commercial property I own. I can't speak to Publix, but I've learned enough to know you know what you are talking about. I had a long talk with my realtor yesterday (she is the top one in my area). We went into some of what you mention. With the fb economy, interest rates and some things more specific to my area, the commercial property market is crap.
Eric Adams says Illegal Aliens could solve the lifeguard problem in NYC. Would you want an illegal watching over your life. LOL! Liberals are a MESS.
PS, 1,950,000 migrants have entered NYC Shelters with 65,000 still there. Think about that! 2 million new people in NYC!
PS, 1,950,000 migrants have entered NYC Shelters with 65,000 still there. Think about that! 2 million new people in NYC!
LMAO, only wants CNN, MSNBC, CBS, maybe one other there, NO FOX. No audience, and they want to be able to shut mic off (when he starts mumbling) and they pick the moderator (to lob easy questions to mushy).. Trumps crew won't let that happen.
Interesting Data: Morgan Stanley has built 2 different stock portfolios, based on the winner in the Potus election. The "Dem" basket of stocks emphasizes sectors that would benefit from Dem policies/victory (defense contractors, for example) while the "Repub" basket emphasizes sectors that would benefit from a Repub victory.
The Repub basket has outperformed by 4.5% YTD.
The Repub basket has outperformed by 4.5% YTD.
No audience. Biden team basically said an audience would be a deal breaker.
There's no reason for Trump to debate Biden.
Biden will be tweaking harder than Skinny Pete and Badger on whatever cocktail they inject in him.
Biden will be tweaking harder than Skinny Pete and Badger on whatever cocktail they inject in him.
In the restaurant business, the company I work for owns many of the properties our restaurants sit on, but we do lease a lot of properties as well. The properties we own are under separate LLC's than the restaurant itself. the restaurant actually leases from the separate LLC the property sits on. That way if the restaurant underperforms and we close it, we still have the property to lease to whoever wants to take over the building.
We once sold a whole market of restaurants to another franchisee, but kept the land they sit on. So we are still making money as the landlord to those operators.
Don't forget, with HIS format, he will be schooled on what questions will be asked and supplied the answers YET AGAIN with earpiece.
Similar threads
