Goodness, Mitch. Stay out of it. In context you may understand. If not, I don’t care.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Goodness, Mitch. Stay out of it. In context you may understand. If not, I don’t care.
Move the goalposts...move, move the goalposts! One more time!
Were we talking about drilling ice cores in the tundra? No, we were talking about taking temperatures. And you didn't answer the question (call me SURPRISED! Not.) and you clearly do not know what I'm talking about. Again ... disappointed, but NOT surprised.
IOW, you were wrong & can't face it. And you do care since you responded. Make up your mind, Goofy.
Ice cores are how we compare temperatures, nimrod. How else would we have temperature records from thousands of years ago? Were there cavemen out there with thermometers? You demonstrate your ignorance in every post.
And ice cores come from the Antarctic, not the tundra...
We were talking about the Bill of Right the entire time.
I said Constitution, which obviously includes the Bill of Right.
Dion then deflected to war powers.
I admitted I should have not gotten lazy, and continued to explicitly say Bill of Rights, and not assume that was implied in context.
In my post you quoted, I literally said I slipped up.
You are a clown.
Your strawman arguments are not very effective. Your first paragraph is all BS because I never said I support government suppressing rights. I guess you feel it's easy to support an argument when you get to invent the other person's point of view.
If you think the State should have the ability to decide what is a right and who gets them, you do support an all powerful State. If rights have no logical basis, and you are saying they don't, then whatever Government decides is correct. That's an all powerful State.
Whether or not the Bill of Rights applies to noncitizens is immaterial to the point. As is the focus on the God part of 'natural rights'. And your attempted semantics between the Constitution and its Bill of Rights.
Simply: If one believes in the concept of 'natural rights' that are inherent to humans(whether God-given or naturally discovered or whatever) then they should be against suppressing those rights. Regardless of the legal complexities.
No one has as of yet explained why they do. Other than obviously the entire point of contention, their undocumented status, which even if taken to the worst extreme and there's no asylum legal complexities is a misdemeanor. Rarely do misdemeanors cause you to lose your constitutional rights.
You don't support the government suppressing the natural rights of Heriberto Carbajal-Flores by removing his 2nd Amendment right? Then what are we even talking about?
The Constitution determines what rights we have. We the People.
Democrat strategist says Democrats are losing support because of ‘preachy females’ controlling the party
“Well, 48 percent of the people that vote are males. Do you mind if they have some consideration?”
thepostmillennial.com
The people that said that going from 350ppm CO2 to 450ppm CO2 would cause runaway warming really should look at different ice ages in our history... We had an ice age with 1800ppm CO2... if CO2 was that big of driver for heat then we'd have burned up millennia ago.
Look up what ppm plants start to die on Earth.... You might be shocked to learn that we saved the planet by putting CO2 back into the atmosphere. Why do we get 100% of the blame but none of the credit?
Heat island effect. Look where temps are being taken. We all know blacktop and concrete get hotter than a nice green forest. If you take temps at 2ft off the ground inside a city.... it's going to read hotter than 50ft off the ground in a city or out in wooded area.
Hydrogen fuel cells make more sense than battery powered cars. Lithium is really bad for the environment to mine. Hydrogen is pretty easy to get with solar power.
How do they know with any degree of certainty that taking a random core of ice from a few hundred feet down and taking it to a lab to look at it under a microscope or whatever the hell they do with it, is an accurate gauge of what the temps were globally 30,000 years ago? Thats not settled science. There’s no such thing. It’s a hypothesis based on whatever they gather from that core.
The ice cores tell us directly via the ratio of heavy to light oxygen in the water molecules. Just because you personally are ignorant and have no idea what scientists are doing when they're "taking it to a lab to look at it under a microscope or whatever the hell they do with it" doesn't mean it's invalid. Just that means you personally are a moron.
Last edited:
So just so you all know. Dion is again making shit up. He does not know what he is talking about. Claiming to be an expert in everything but has no clue what he is talking about.
He sounds like a bag of dumb parroting some flaky armed wokie homoglobo crap. You all are wasting your time trying with this pea brain
There is no climate change happening man made. He is spouting lies and regurgitated DSA talking points.
He sounds like a bag of dumb parroting some flaky armed wokie homoglobo crap. You all are wasting your time trying with this pea brain
There is no climate change happening man made. He is spouting lies and regurgitated DSA talking points.
And we took core temps a 1000 years ago "nimrod" (you probably see that as a compliment)? Is that what you just argued? FTR, the tundra reference was just a side easter egg to the "frozen tundra of lambeau field". Sorry grammer police!! That went over your head too.
Again you demo that my original comment went way over your smooth brain. you have no idea what you are talking about, fool.
Please explain this to our resident "expert in everything".
bwahahaha
He probably thinks Cal is a defense guru...
So dion is now arguing that climate change is not cyclical throughout history.
And he accidentally forgot to tell us how many ms-13 members he allows into his house. And gives them guns.
And he accidentally forgot to tell us how many ms-13 members he allows into his house. And gives them guns.
That's how ice works. It's frozen. They're made up of snow that fell those thousands of years ago yes.
Cyclical meaning what? Sometimes things happen that make the temperature go up. Other times other things happen that make it go down. Both have happened at various times in our planet's long multibillion year history. Currently humans are burning lots of fossil fuels, pumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, making it go up. What about that is confusing?
For a simple response on a chat board and not another book ... Because we are intelligent enough to understand in a perfect world, there would be one set of rules for all.
However we live in a fallen world and live w jerks like you. Because of that, we have to have a set of rules we can all live within to function as a society. The good ole US of A has done the best at allowing for freedom and liberty than any other man made set of rules anywhere and at any time on this planet. People from other countries are not bound by our rules (and they prove it.) So why would they be bound by our rules and why would we be bound by theirs? It is really not any more complicated than that.
Now ... do your dishonest, non-discussion, gotcha thing.
Do you have to turn a paper in on this? Are you going to appropriately cite all of us? Or is this an app for harvard?
They just showed a poll on Ingraham Angle that Trump was leading biDIM in all the swing states but…., all the down ballot dims were leading the republicans. People are STUPID!
Last edited:
Yes or no ...
Has the climate changed on THIS planet for thousands and thousands of years?
The person in question is here and is bound by our rules. If they kill someone they get prosecuted under our laws. Because we have authority as the crime was committed in our jurisdiction. Do you think undocumented people should be immune from all prosecution?
I think it was Spain got caught doing this to explain record heat. They were putting their temp gauges 2 ft off the ground in a parking lot. They were showing a 4 degree difference on temp gauges just 20km away from each other. they were wanting to show a huge temp increase to justify bad policy.
Large cities will often be 2 or more degrees hotter than rural areas outside the city. It's not that the temperature is hotter its just that cities tend to absorb more of the suns rays and return them throughout the day.
So does he think we only had 1 ice age? Does he think the Earth has never been a snowball? How does he think we stopped being a snowball if CO2 is the only way to heat up?
Getting Ronna out will help. Her NBC interview showed she was working against the party to help the uniparty.
Yes of course. Did you watch the video I posted? Now a simple yes or no for you: is human activity causing the majority of the currently observed extreme warming?
Plants & animals were living at 200ppm. So why do you think there is a need for more?
Nope and EDIT: yep. The world is heating purely because of human activity. Specifically, science says it is caused by the curious branch of humanity, called the blowhardius lefticus. Because there is no resolution for the blowhardius lefticus, I propose that we reduce their activity by 100% starting today. So anyone that finds a blowhardius lefticus, please eliminate them ASAP and stop the suffering the rest of us endure daily.
End edit.
Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that human activity is THE majority cause? Can you define "extreme warming" as opposed to regular, or non extreme warming? What dataset did you use to discern the difference between warming and "extreme warming"? Or ...are you just baking your bias into that proverbial cake?
And since you agree with us that the climate has changed over the life of this planet ... has it changed without mankind? Yes or no? Did it change on its own? Yes or no? Is "extreme warming"in the room with us now?
You cannot use your unconcious and confirmation biases to form a compelling argument.
Last edited:
The temps are based on standardized locations, not blacktop locations. And if only blacktop, why would the temps be higher today than 50 years ago on the same blacktop?
Bad day for those suffering from TDS. Trumps ridiculous bond gets cut...and on the same day he rakes in 3 billion dollars. Hell...he could have paid the 454 million dollar bond and still came out about 2.5 billion dollars richer on the day.
