Wrong again, DA.That's exactly what he said Lost FLoser.
His words exactly....."The ISSUE is their protest was "CRIMINALIZED".....
In other words they were arrested for their actions on Jan 6th but shouldn't have been.
Your matching opinion shows clearly your complete moral rot.
He said, "The issue is their protest was criminalized where your sides, where cities were burned, was deemed noble. That is grounds for more protest."
To which, you said, "You think breaking thru barricades, doors, windows, destroying property and assaulting police should not be criminalized??? Wow."
He didnt make a comment whether he believed they shouldve been criminalized or not in that post, at ALL. INSTEAD his comment was that ONE side is criminalized and ONE side, that did more REAL, ACTUAL, MEASUREABLE damage was not only NOT criminalized, but was "deemed noble". That is what he said, idiot. Oh, and i didnt say whether they should be criminalized either. "Moral rot". What a pompous DA.
Again, you LIED about both ... you either are lying, or just too stupid to understand. Probably both.
I would say "do better", but we all know you cannot.