Nuclear energy.
Clean, safe, half the price (at least...)
Clean, safe, half the price (at least...)
Everything is anecdotal with him. Schools aren’t grooming and indoctrinating kids despite all the evidence we present on the daily because his school “would never do that”. The economy is rolling because bars are full after UK games on a college campus. There’s a rampant epidemic of 10 year olds getting raped and being denied abortions because one in Ohio got knocked up by an illegal and had to travel out of state. (More than likely traveled out of state to protect the illegal.) get the picture?Your anecdotal experience is meaningless.
Of course those changes were not human related. The current ones are. It isn't about getting "the planet into some sort of stabilized condition", it's just about not shoving it over a cliff. If we continue on this carbon path we will change the planet in ways that will significantly affect it and every living thing on it for thousands, possibly millions, of years. That's much more than "maybe a generation or two".The fact you think we can get the planet into some sort of stabilized condition is what’s patently absurd. Those “circumstances of their time” were not human related or impacted by humans. They were happening regardless because of the forces of nature. We can’t prevent an asteroid from causing mass extinction or a volcano eruption or earthquakes, Or the Sun getting progressively hotter. Can we make rain machines? Yeah, can we pollute the hell out of things, yeah, but again it’s barely a blip. It affects you and us here today and maybe a generation or two beyond. Again teensy blips. You aren’t changing the course of human existence for millions of years to come.
I don’t think any of my posts have said we shouldn’t. But we shouldn’t shut down fossil fuels completely without an honest, efficient, and as cheap or cheaper alternatives functioning, tested and in place. The mandates are ignorant. If they would just let the free market do its thing, we would eventually evolve into that. But the government has to stick its nose into every new and burgeoning technology and start mandating things way before they are ready for mass consumption.All most likely true, but the fact that fossil fuels are a limited resource remains, so it DOES make sense to actively promote research into alternative resources. The most pracitcal, at this point, are nuclear energy plants, and then ongoing improvements in battery technology. Those two things (along with efficient solar gathering), will ultimately be the answers.
But, like I said; sooner or later it's getting blown out like a GD match. LOL
The best scenario (for my sense of humor anyway), is that mankind finally hits on the sweet spot, ie finds perfectly clean and renewable energy, and during the huge celebration, a big rock blows up the earth, just as the ribbon cutting commences. LOL
So, you and I stand united in the move towards more nuclear power plants?Of course those changes were not human related. The current ones are. It isn't about getting "the planet into some sort of stabilized condition", it's just about not shoving it over a cliff. If we continue on this carbon path we will change the planet in ways that will significantly affect it and every living thing on it for thousands, possibly millions, of years. That's much more than "maybe a generation or two".
The current one are only to a certain point. And so far none of the doomsday predictions that have been floated out there for the past half century have even come close to coming to fruition. The climate hysteria is a money grab and fear mongering pushed by the likes of the WEF/UN to exercise control and implement their agendas. But none of that matters if Yellowstone has a massive eruption that wipes out the western half of the US. Or if the new Madrid fault decides it’s going to level a chunk of the Midwest. Us cutting out fossil fuels and forcing us to rely on our adversaries for oil, while China and India keep cranking out coal fired power plants is doing zilch. How about we get the worlds worst polluters on board and fixed first before we worry about one of the countries with far far lower emissions issues.Of course those changes were not human related. The current ones are. It isn't about getting "the planet into some sort of stabilized condition", it's just about not shoving it over a cliff. If we continue on this carbon path we will change the planet in ways that will significantly affect it and every living thing on it for thousands, possibly millions, of years. That's much more than "maybe a generation or two".
Of course. This is from yesterday:So, you and I stand united in the move towards more nuclear power plants?
Take nuclear. A perfect example of what you're talking about where hysterics override sense. The left and right should be able to come to a common sense compromise to fund and develop safer American green nuclear tech. But the Karens on both sides yell about it because they don't understand it. People talking about the problem isn't the issue, uneducated voices being heeded is. Climate change is a big deal to a majority of the population, we need to inform them on the topic, not ignore and pooh-pooh it.
A large portion of MAGA just wants to be entertained. Maybe they don't realize a portion of the party they're apart of but also hates won't vote for Trump in Nov. Several regulars here have already admitted previously that Trump can't win the general; that he's toxic and women largely can't stand him. But...they can't leave ole Don so here we are. To win you need several groups behind you, not a swath of angry middle aged men. IMO chances are high I'll be here in Nov. saying the choice was right there, it could've been Haley who would crush Biden, but nope. Maybe at some point this thread will understand you're in the minority if you think the election was stolen and only Trump can save not only the country but the world.
These are of people who think they are smarter and better than you because they have a pretty job title in government and a fancy degree. 3/4 could be fired tomorrow and the country would not skip a beat.
Biden getting America back to the moon! He just can't stop WINNING! Something else that clown fatass cheeto couldn't get done.
There are intentional "greening" projects being undertaken by people in specific places, but vegetation loss continues in the poorest communities with underdeveloped economies that you were referencing. Brazil is not getting greener.
He passed 2 years ago. He was 85. He loved the mail in ballots because it was difficult for him to drive and get around to vote. Standing in long lines was not his thing at that age.You’re retired. How old is your dad?
A large portion of MAGA just wants to be entertained. Maybe they don't realize a portion of the party they're apart of but also hates won't vote for Trump in Nov. Several regulars here have already admitted previously that Trump can't win the general; that he's toxic and women largely can't stand him. But...they can't leave ole Don so here we are. To win you need several groups behind you, not a swath of angry middle aged men. IMO chances are high I'll be here in Nov. saying the choice was right there, it could've been Haley who would crush Biden, but nope. Maybe at some point this thread will understand you're in the minority if you think the election was stolen and only Trump can save not only the country but the world.
I believe that makes him, to a leftist, a Minor Attracted Person. On the spectrum of love. So brave. He should have gon to Cali where Newsome could pardon him.
I can give a succinct analysis- Dey gon cheat again.Nightwish said: The electoral map and race to 270 likely looks similar to 2020 this year which means another Biden victory.
Hmmm... I don't actually agree. But I'd very much like to see your state by state analysis of Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin,.
Yes we will. Thanks for PSA.
They can learn to code.I saw a projection that the US would lose 600k autoworker related jobs by 2030 if we keep doing the Biden green initiative. That would sink our economy. EV's just don't have the draw or infrastructure to replace gas vehicles.
Because they aren't anarchists. They're a far right militia. Now go read Antifa literature or the public front statements of basically any political group. You'll find plenty of things that sound great. Up to you to figure out whether their actions match their rhetoric.
How is a stranger on your property, especially a criminal illegal alien from who knows where and/or from who knows which foreign prison, with who knows what sort of criminal background, not a danger or threat to your family?
They can learn to code.
Did I do that right Dems?