ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Not sure why you are tagging me without listing just one country. But I guess your statement at the end about Canada comes the closest to answering my question...so is that your choice? Canada?

However, I did notice that amongst the multiple countries you listed...the majority of them have predominantly higher white populations than the US which is interesting. Most of them with black populations hovering around 4%. The Scandinavian countries far, far less. It’s also difficult to compare the US on demographics on some of those countries given their current immigration policies (see my earlier comment when you posted the list with Denmark at the top).

Also, it doesn’t make me (or anyone else) a racist for pointing out statistical data especially given the nature of this topic...providing the best opportunities for every race, creed, etc...It also doesn’t make you a racist for choosing those countries over the much more diverse US...but they are intriguingly interesting choices given the topic of discussion.

A couple of those countries don’t even keep statistical data on racial makeup...Germany for instance...ie they don’t divide stats into racial categories at all...therefore they don’t have racial quotas, diversity departments in schools & companies, don’t have an EEOC equivalent, etc...I find that interesting as well. Don’t know enough about them to know if that has lead to better racial harmony than what we have in the US...but it sure would make a great case study. Since you chose those countries maybe you could elaborate? Is not keeping racial statistics/racial quotas part of your Utopian plan?

BTW...I’ve been to all of those countries except for the Scandinavian countries & the Alps region. All beautiful countries with a lot of unique qualities. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that I would prefer living in any of them over the US...but they are wonderful places to visit for sure. Glad you have had the means and opportunity to visit ALL of them. That’s pretty awesome.

Remind me again...which country were you working in/living in when you were able to afford to freely travel to so many wonderful countries?

I wouldn't have pegged Dion as so firmly anti-POC based on his professed leftist position, but it makes sense considering the history of the D party. He clearly would've hated MLK Jr, a man who wanted his children to be judged on the content of their character rather than pigmentation.

Now to see he'd rather live in a country without so many non-white people, well, that is something he and Gov Wallace and Hilary's mentor could have agreed on. I wonder if he based his decision on the US crime data. HOW MANY crimes (and riots) would not have been committed in the past decade if Dion had his way and the people he doesn't want to live with left this country?

I guess it could be considered comforting to some to know that it's not just some "white" people that hate people that look just like them. There's actually "non-white" guilt as well as "white guilt. Golly. Things is just getting complicateder and complicateder.
 
Oh. And also, Dion, why did every country you list be white countries? Are you really that racist?
The countries I listed are rich countries that are further down the economic industrial pathway of improving the quality of life for their citizenry. The only ones mentioning race are you racists attributing their success to their racial makeup.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Girthang
Oh. And also, Dion, why did every country you list be white countries? Are you really that racist?

Was wondering the same damn thing. We may have found David Duke. After all this time returning to the Democrat party fold where his heart and ideologies lined up all along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bertfan31
I wouldn't have pegged Dion as so firmly anti-POC based on his professed leftist position, but it makes sense considering the history of the D party. He clearly would've hated MLK Jr, a man who wanted his children to be judged on the content of their character rather than pigmentation.

Now to see he'd rather live in a country without so many non-white people, well, that is something he and Gov Wallace and Hilary's mentor could have agreed on. I wonder if he based his decision on the US crime data. HOW MANY crimes (and riots) would not have been committed in the past decade if Dion had his way and the people he doesn't want to live with left this country?

I guess it could be considered comforting to some to know that it's not just some "white" people that hate people that look just like them. There's actually "non-white" guilt as well as "white guilt. Golly. Things is just getting complicateder and complicateder.
MLK was a socialist who would hate you and everything you stand for. The right’s attempted adoption of MLK and the whitewashing done to his legacy is one of the most despicable perversions of modern history.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Girthang
The adults are sending tanks to Ukraine. The clowns are on a mesage board crying about evil Zelensky and his hoard of stolen money.
s4ofyzmi3gja1.jpg
 
I remember when someone called him out for being a millionaire and having 3 houses while he complained about millionaires. His response was "I wrote a book". It's not cool to be a millionaire if you have a vision and drive and are willing to sink your own money into your business. But if you write a book? You've earned that money and are beyond reproach.

Dems. Whatareyagonnado?
He has hired his wife on his campaign staff every time he has run. Made a lot of money doing that.
 
MLK was a socialist who would hate you and everything you stand for. The right’s attempted adoption of MLK and the whitewashing done to his legacy is one of the most despicable perversions of modern history.

I met people very close to him and his family. You couldn't be more wrong about him, too, but that seems to be your MO. Are you ever right about anything? Considering how much the African American pastors in Lexington hated him, and refused to let him speak at their churches, I'm guessing you think they were what... conservative and not leftist?

But there you go again with your racist comments like "whitewashing." Dion, dion

That I know of MLK Jr wasnt a racist, but I've gotten along pretty well with racist POC. Would likely have been married to a non-racist one if her mother wasn't such a racist. Dated a handful of minority women over a few decades and it was always their parents that freaked out and put an end to things.

Anyway, how ffs did anyone "whitewash" MLK Jr? Give us the leftist conspiracy theory on this one. Should be very en"lightening."
 
Here's a nice thought experiment for you Dion. (Since I'm so racist, and all, according to your racist ass)

Swap the 10 million Danes in denmark with the 10 million Somalis in Somalia.

Complete displacement of both populations, infrastructure, etc all stays. All wealth. Let's check back in 10 years and see how many new museums are in Somalia, and how many goats are walking downtown Copenhagen.

And right now, given the choice, gun at your head, you.picking Denmark, or Somalia?

Answer that direct question. Directly. No dodging, dipping, bobbing and weaving. Be a man and answer that question.
 
All these cities offered their police up to the lynch mob. Plus doj took the side of lawlessness when they started prosecuting any and all allegation made by any criminal.

I'm certainly not a back the blue person, but it's ridiculous the way they were treated. Now we'll all suffer and it will eventually swing back too far in the other direction
It can’t go too far in the other direction. Cops have not been doing what the left claims except in very isolated cases that have been politicized.

There needs to be a huge crackdown on the widespread lawlessness in this country.

Society cannot survive without sanctions.
 
MLK was a socialist who would hate you and everything you stand for. The right’s attempted adoption of MLK and the whitewashing done to his legacy is one of the most despicable perversions of modern history.

Deflect and distract, project and emote. Love how you never answer any questions and never look in the mirror. I get that introspection can be tough for people when there's self-loathing, and why wouldnt there be when you feel like you need someone else to pay your way all the time, but it really is important to look at that guy in the mirror that hates you so much and figure out why that is.

Also, why all of a sudden do "despicable perversions" suddenly come to your attention with such wrath, when only a couple years ago you voted for a pedophile, and continue to defend the son and fellow pedophile? I thought the left embraced "despicable perversions" like the idea of rioting being "mostly peaceful," and inner city violence in firmly and consistently liberal controlled governments, and the murder of millions of people during and following the bolshevik revolution. All these you embrace

Yet, people who are conservative appreciating MLK Jr is somehow offensive to you on a level higher than almost anything else?

Nevermind, I understand why you hate yourself and anyone who is "non-white." With takes so hypocritical, racist, and just plain ignorantly incorrect it makes sense.
 
Last edited:
What's Republican evidence of a stolen election? Multiple accusations. I remember one person who said that the Democrats were so evil (or clever or something) that they didn't leave any evidence. Now, there's all the emails of Fox talking heads coming out about how insane the Trump accusations were. But they kept on joining in. The Fox talking heads knew the accusations were phony and a lie but kept right on repeating them. There's even a tape of Trump conceding. Think of Sidney Powell. What was her evidence? She experienced something like time travel in a semi-conscious state. On and on and on.

You can't reason a person into a position they weren't reasoned into.
What a crock of BS
 
Here's a nice thought experiment for you Dion. (Since I'm so racist, and all, according to your racist ass)

Swap the 10 million Danes in denmark with the 10 million Somalis in Somalia.

Complete displacement of both populations, infrastructure, etc all stays. All wealth. Let's check back in 10 years and see how many new museums are in Somalia, and how many goats are walking downtown Copenhagen.

And right now, given the choice, gun at your head, you.picking Denmark, or Somalia?

Answer that direct question. Directly. No dodging, dipping, bobbing and weaving. Be a man and answer that question.

Crickets. I'm gonna go ahead and guess that he won't answer the direct question directly. Don't know why I have this gut instinct
 
Oh, you.mean capitalism, and not tribal warfare, warlords, dictators, etc?
I mean the ideals of the Enlightenment, the democratization of power, and the advance of technology. You would call Canada and the UK socialist with their healthcare and welfare if you were talking negatively about them. But for your point they’re bastions of free enterprise capitalism? Talking out of both sides of your mouth is as natural for you as breathing.
 
The countries I listed are rich countries that are further down the economic industrial pathway of improving the quality of life for their citizenry. The only ones mentioning race are you racists attributing their success to their racial makeup.

No one has attributed any success to racial makeup except you, DeeDee.

You can't answer a question because the data surrounding YOUR CHOICE doesn't suit YOU. No one here said Denmark was "successful" except YOU. I don't consider it successful because it is a socialist house of cards.

It also WOULDN'T EXIST nor be economically "successful" to you if it had open borders, true socialism, and allowed citizens to burn down the property of other citizens without recourse- all policies the left (AND THAT MEANS YOU) espouses for the USA. Let's also address the Danes and their role in enslaving other peoples....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caveman Catfan
I mean the ideals of the Enlightenment, the democratization of power, and the advance of technology. You would call Canada and the UK socialist with their healthcare and welfare if you were talking negatively about them. But for your point they’re bastions of free enterprise capitalism? Talking out of both sides of your mouth is as natural for you as breathing.

Yep. See, everyone? Dion the Dodger!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Girthang
Here's a nice thought experiment for you Dion. (Since I'm so racist, and all, according to your racist ass)

Swap the 10 million Danes in denmark with the 10 million Somalis in Somalia.

Complete displacement of both populations, infrastructure, etc all stays. All wealth. Let's check back in 10 years and see how many new museums are in Somalia, and how many goats are walking downtown Copenhagen.

And right now, given the choice, gun at your head, you.picking Denmark, or Somalia?

Answer that direct question. Directly. No dodging, dipping, bobbing and weaving. Be a man and answer that question.
Your posit is nuts because you’re replacing current people who’ve already grown up and formed their habits and opinions.

If your posit was somehow tomorrow swapping all Danes to black and all Somalis to white and they’d always been that way then nothing about their lives would be any different. The Danes are who they are thanks to historical circumstance and the same for the Somalis. Nothing about who they are is because they have black or white skin, other than of course how those are perceived by others in our society. Due also obviously to historical circumstances.

Obviously you think differently. So now that I’ve answered your question explain to me why Denmark is great because of their white skin and Somalia is trash because of their black skin.
 
It can’t go too far in the other direction. Cops have not been doing what the left claims except in very isolated cases that have been politicized.

There needs to be a huge crackdown on the widespread lawlessness in this country.

Society cannot survive without sanctions.

It can go too far. Police need restrained by the constitution and other laws. Not an issue for most but with dwindling numbers these agencies loosened their criteria and it went predictably bad
 
Your posit is nuts because you’re replacing current people who’ve already grown up and formed their habits and opinions.

If your posit was somehow tomorrow swapping all Danes to black and all Somalis to white and they’d always been that way then nothing about their lives would be any different. The Danes are who they are thanks to historical circumstance and the same for the Somalis. Nothing about who they are is because they have black or white skin, other than of course how those are perceived by others in our society. Due also obviously to historical circumstances.

Obviously you think differently. So now that I’ve answered your question explain to me why Denmark is great because of their white skin and Somalia is trash because of their black skin.

I didn't say that, and you DIDNT answer my question, so I'll ask again.

Where you moving? Tomorrow? Gun at your head. Denmark or Somalia?
 
I didn't say that, and you DIDNT answer my question, so I'll ask again.

Where you moving? Tomorrow? Gun at your head. Denmark or Somalia?
I did answer your question and now you’re dodging mine. If Denmark was the same in every way except everyone there was black it’d be a great place to live.

It's a one word answer.
Ok, where did you bury the bodies of the children you raped and murdered? It’s a one word answer, answer the question!
 
I met people very close to him and his family. You couldn't be more wrong about him, too, but that seems to be your MO. Are you ever right about anything? Considering how much the African American pastors in Lexington hated him, and refused to let him speak at their churches, I'm guessing you think they were what... conservative and not leftist?

But there you go again with your racist comments like "whitewashing." Dion, dion

That I know of MLK Jr wasnt a racist, but I've gotten along pretty well with racist POC. Would likely have been married to a non-racist one if her mother wasn't such a racist. Dated a handful of minority women over a few decades and it was always their parents that freaked out and put an end to things.

Anyway, how ffs did anyone "whitewash" MLK Jr? Give us the leftist conspiracy theory on this one. Should be very en"lightening."
Deflect and distract, project and emote. Love how you never answer any questions and never look in the mirror. I get that introspection can be tough for people when there's self-loathing, and why wouldnt there be when you feel like you need someone else to pay your way all the time, but it really is important to look at that guy that hates you so much and figure out why that is.

Also, why all of a sudden do "despicable perversions" suddenly come to your attention with such wrath, when only a couple years ago you voted for a pedophile, and continue to defend the son and fellow pedophile? I thought the left embraced "despicable perversions" like the idea of rioting being "mostly peaceful," and inner city violence in firmly and consistently liberal controlled governments, and the murder of millions of people during and following the bolshevik revolution. All these you embrace

Yet, people who are conservative appreciating MLK Jr is somehow offensive to you on a level higher than almost anything else?

Nevermind, I understand why you hate yourself and anyone who is "non-white." With takes so hypocritical, racist, and just plain ignorantly incorrect it makes sense.
Here's some of it from his own mouth. MLK wouldn’t be embraced by either party if he were speaking today. Just like he wasn’t at the time he was alive. Because he’s more radical than either party. He sure as hell wouldn’t be a Republican though and he’d be demonized by them and called a communist race hustler.
  1. "I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic... [Capitalism] started out with a noble and high motive... but like most human systems it fell victim to the very thing it was revolting against. So today capitalism has out-lived its usefulness."
    - Letter to Coretta Scott, July 18, 1952.
  2. "In a sense, you could say we're involved in the class struggle."
    -Quote to New York Times reporter, Jose Igelsias, 1968.
  3. "And one day we must ask the question, 'Why are there forty million poor people in America? And when you begin to ask that question, you are raising questions about the economic system, about a broader distribution of wealth.' When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy. And I'm simply saying that more and more, we've got to begin to ask questions about the whole society..."
    -Speech to Southern Christian Leadership Conference Atlanta, Georgia, August 16, 1967.
  4. "Capitalism forgets that life is social."
    -Speech to Southern Christian Leadership Conference Atlanta, Georgia, August 16, 1967.
  5. "Call it democracy, or call it democratic socialism, but there must be a better distribution of wealth within this country for all God's children."
    - Speech to the Negro American Labor Council, 1961.
  6. "We must recognize that we can't solve our problem now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power... this means a revolution of values and other things. We must see now that the evils of racism, economic exploitation and militarism are all tied together... you can't really get rid of one without getting rid of the others... the whole structure of American life must be changed. America is a hypocritical nation and [we] must put [our] own house in order."
    - Report to SCLC Staff, May 1967.
  7. "The evils of capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and evils of racism."
    -Speech to SCLC Board, March 30, 1967.
  8. "I am now convinced that the simplest approach will prove to be the most effective - the solution to poverty is to abolish it directly by a now widely discussed matter: the guaranteed income... The curse of poverty has no justification in our age. It is socially as cruel and blind as the practice of cannibalism at the dawn of civilization, when men ate each other because they had not yet learned to take food from the soil or to consume the abundant animal life around them. The time has come for us to civilize ourselves by the total, direct and immediate abolition of poverty."
    - Where do We Go from Here?,1967.
  9. "You can't talk about solving the economic problem of the Negro without talking about billions of dollars. You can't talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You're really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry. Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong with capitalism."
    - Speech to his staff, 1966.
  10. "[W]e are saying that something is wrong ... with capitalism.... There must be better distribution of wealth and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism."
    - Speech to his staff, 1966.
  11. "If America does not use her vast resources of wealth to end poverty and make it possible for all of God's children to have the basic necessities of life, she too will go to hell."
    - Speech at Bishop Charles Mason Temple of the Church of God in Christ in support of the Memphis sanitation workers' strike on March 18th, 1968, two weeks before he was assassinated.
 
I'm not totally up to date on world populations, but I'd guess Denmark has way less than 10 million people. But even if you swapped their entire population with an equal number of random people from a neighboring country, both would be completely fooked very quickly, so I would choose neither and would just stay here.
 
You have the memos of the Fox people who didn't believe the lies they were telling on TV. At this point, what does "transparency" mean to you? It sounds like it just means not wanting to believe you've been had. I'm sure you've even seen the Trump video of him conceding the election. Is it simply vanity on your part? You've been had. All those people who believed have been conned. Some of them are in prison because of the con. Lots of them have continue to send the con man money. Is it Battered Wife Syndrome? Otherwise I don't get it.
Listen dumb shit, I do not worship any politician or take any corporate media as the gospel. That’s what you do.

Want to talk about being had? You’re the dumbest effing group of people in this country. The most naive. You literally question nothing from Democrats. Absolutely nothing. If big government says it, you believe it. If any network that isn’t Fox says something, it’s the truth. You believe Big Pharma doesn’t lie. 😂 You believed “Russia stole the election for Trump in 2016” and “Facebook memes influenced the election” but somehow legitimately believe Biden is the most popular presidential candidate of all-time, nothing fishy whatsoever despite the anomalies, changing of election laws, testimony, video, geo tracking, etc.

I really don’t give a shit to argue with you about 2020, You bastards cheer on the destruction of this country. You’re like the passenger rooting for the plane to crash. That’s what the Dem Party is. You literally cheered on big government shutting down our economy so you could gain power no matter the cost:

You’re a useful idiot who doesn’t know anything that’s not fed to him by DNC media. It’s why you don’t have a clue at what the DNC leaks or Hunter laptop said because it destroys your belief system. In that DNC case, Dems tried to attack how it was leaked instead of the info itself😂 Then you beieved the coordinated lie that Hunter’s laptop was “Russian disinfo.” You do the same thing every time. You idiots never wise up.
 
Last edited:
I finally see the light! This is all a Clinton plot! She had Beau killed so Biden wouldn't run in 2016. All so she could run and lose and make Trump President. So they could set him up for colluding with Russia and Ukraine. So they could finally impeach that bastard. So Pence would be the horrible 2020 nominee. And ALL of this so Warren could be the 1st female President! GENIUS! 10D chess!
ynhg7brpnija1.jpg
 
MLK was a socialist who would hate you and everything you stand for. The right’s attempted adoption of MLK and the whitewashing done to his legacy is one of the most despicable perversions of modern history.

No group has done more damage to the legacy of MLK than the left who have prioritized and politicized race over merit, character, or any other attribute a person can or can’t offer.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT