POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us (by me, Silas, and Timothy), was not āYesā and āNo,ā but in him the āYesā stands firm.
In fact, as many promises as God has made, they have always been āYesā in him. For that reason we also say āAmenā through him to the glory of God.
2 Corinthians 1:19-20 EHV
In fact, as many promises as God has made, they have always been āYesā in him. For that reason we also say āAmenā through him to the glory of God.
2 Corinthians 1:19-20 EHV
Thats mainly what I was trying to get across, although in retrospect I thinkI got sidetracked a bit.
Probably true, but I suspect she wanted to give the appearance of being tough on crime. I believe she went on Don Lemonās show to address the scandal. That, as well, probably justifies termination. Have a damn press conference.
Damn Dioness, I almost forgot this one šŗ
Investigation, investigationā¦blah blah blahā¦
I donāt think they would refuse service because the country isnāt racist and any business that might would be not long to stay open.
Decorum doesn't work against evil. Voting doesn't work with criminals. Government officials should at all times be terrified of the populace or it doesn't work. No more theater, no more investigations and Twitter threats and letters. Doesn't work.
Last edited:
Maybe if Big Oil wasn't raping every American and charging triple what they should for gas... We'd all have a few more bucks in our pocket. But the Pubs just love to scream FJB instead of looking at the insane greed going on.
Exxon And Chevron Set For Record $100 Billion In Profits In 2022 | OilPrice.com
The surge in oil and gas prices will translate into record-high 2022 earnings for the two U.S. supermajors, Exxon and Chevron, with their combined yearly profits hitting nearly $100 billionoilprice.com
But but but I thought it was putins fault, SCIENCE DUDE!
Make up your damn mind.
What percentage of businesses are willing to discriminate solely on the color of skin?
Stopped reading your response when you asserted that oil companies have no incentive or money available for investment. Oil will always be necessary until it runs out and they made RECORD profits last year.
They are playing the gullible fools like always. Blame Biden as the oil flows at the same rate as under Trump and rake in record breaking profits.
Biden granted more oil and gas drilling permits than Trump in his first 2 years in office
Data from the Bureau of Land Management shows that President Biden approved more oil and gas drilling permits in his first two years in office than former President Donald Trump.
Biden Administration Oil, Gas Drilling Approvals Outpace Trumpās
Center for Biological Diversity: Massive Fossil Fuel Expansion Undermines U.S. Climate Commitments
biologicaldiversity.org
Stopped reading your response when you asserted that oil companies have no incentive or money available for investment. Oil will always be necessary until it runs out and they made RECORD profits last year.
They are playing the gullible fools like always. Blame Biden as the oil flows at the same rate as under Trump and rake in record breaking profits.
Biden granted more oil and gas drilling permits than Trump in his first 2 years in office
Data from the Bureau of Land Management shows that President Biden approved more oil and gas drilling permits in his first two years in office than former President Donald Trump.news.yahoo.com
Biden Administration Oil, Gas Drilling Approvals Outpace Trumpās
Center for Biological Diversity: Massive Fossil Fuel Expansion Undermines U.S. Climate Commitmentsbiologicaldiversity.org
So, which is it? Putin, or the greedy oil companies? Putin, or the greedy baby formula companies? Putin, or the greedy eggs farmers? Putin, or the greedy (...)
You're a clown.
The fact you allegedly 'educated' children is a national travesty.
The informed/good citizens of this country are fighting an unbeatable opponent the way things are now. The only thing keeping the US from becoming a complete totalitarian country is the 2nd Amendment. The US government is the largest and most powerful criminal enterprise ever known to man.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Glad they caught this little worm.
www.foxla.com
California Tesla driver caught on video in suspected road rage attack arrested
The Tesla driver who was caught on video in a suspected road rage incident has been arrested, authorities said.
How insane is it that the public allowed the formation of the CIA/ FBI and even Fed Reserve? I guess it would've been too much for these people to fathom the crazy shit that would ensue but in the 1900s, we let government control just explode. Then when 9/11 happened, we just let the Patriot Act happen.
You're not free in this country.
That's the funniest thing I've seen for quite a while.
Sex is an immutable characteristic. Being gay or trans is not a choice. The cake is a pink cake with blue frosting. That is not speech. Itās a pink cake with blue frosting. Phillips is free to hate gay and trans people as much as he wants, but if he also wants to run a business he has to serve them. Thatās the law. The trans person is just trying to buy a cake from a cake shop, not deny service to Phillips because heās Christian.
A.k.a. since heās one of yāall you like the same standard doesnāt apply. Thanks for posting to confirm your hypocrisy.
āConservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis Wilhoit
The Patriot Act came before 9/11. It was written beforehand. "they hate us because of our freedom". George Bush
He didnāt win. The SC didnāt rule on the substance of the case the first time. The issue is still undecided and must be decided by the courts.
No, it's not a pink cake with blue frosting. It's a pink cake with blue frosting to celebrate a gender change, or some such nonsense.
I'm sure homeboy has made a cake for an actual gender reveal party, when someone is finding out the immutable characteristic of sex at birth, commie boy.
Funny how you describe sex as an immutable characteristic, protected from discrimination, yet decide that someone can flip flop back and forth on said immutable characteristic whenever it suits them. An utter clown position.
Which is fitting, since you're a clown!
He would sell them a cake, he just wouldnāt customize it for them. You think you can go into a Mexican restaurant and ask for Chinese for and expect them to make it?
Wrong. She asked for a pink cake with blue frosting. That is not compelled speech. He agreed to bake it. She said it was for a transition party. He then changed his mind and refused to make it because of that. After previously agreeing. That is the definition of refusal of service based on sex. As the courts agreed. Youāre just flat wrong on the specifics and issues at play.
āWe conclude that creating a pink cake with blue frosting is not inherently expressive and any message or symbolism it provides to an observer would not be attributed to the baker.ā Courts own words.
No, a pink cake with blue frosting is not compelled speech. As the court ruled. He wasnāt asked to bake a cake with, āI support sex transitioning!ā on it. Just a colored cake. He initially agreed to make the cake and then refused once he found out who it is was for. Denial of service.
Reminder that there was election interference when our intelligence agencies and the media colluded with democrats to intentionally mislead the American people about the Bidens.
Honest to God interference with an election.
Ok, for hypothetical sake, let's say someone with a swastika neck tattoo walks in and asks for a white cake with white frosting in the shape of a kkk hood. No words.
You ok with forcing that baker to make that cake?
Cause sex isn't at issue here, the issue is someone making up their sex, which this guy disagrees with, based on his religion. As you liberals like to say, my rights don't end where yours begins, or whatever fool slogan it is.
Utter nonsense. Unfit for a serious person to make this kind of nonsensical argument.
And since I know you're going to say he agreed to make it, the. Wouldn't, and no one would make a cake in my hypothetical, say a phone call comes in asking for the white cake, with dimensions required. Baker makes the cake, obviously nazi guy comes in to buy it, baker refuses to sell it to him.
Discrimination based on race, or nah?
Or, how about, leave the guy alone, and order a cake from someone else who will.make it, you despicable liberal nut job.
Because it had nothing to do with the cake ...
Which is why it has to be litigated. The fundamental issue here is does religious belief give you the right to discriminate against others who are protected by the same legal mechanism your religious belief is. Itās a contradiction in our system that must be resolved.
Similar threads
