Word.Brevity, no one is going to read all of this. More pictures and less words and I can read it.
Word.Brevity, no one is going to read all of this. More pictures and less words and I can read it.
So did everyone else.
The problem with the LA Times poll is that they poll the same people every week...the very same people. They also give more weight to people who are enthusiastic about their candidate. Can't say I know anyone who is "enthusiastic" about Hillary but I do know a lot of people who are scared to death of Trump.
It also doesn't give consideration to the Electoral College which is where Trump is at a huge disadvantage. Blue states like California, NY, NJ, IL, etc put Clinton at 250+ electoral votes. Trump has to win almost every swing state and losing just one if it's FL, PA or OH means he can't get to 270.
Nate Silver gives Trump a 24% chance in FL, a 10.3% chance in PA and a 35% chance in OH. His chance at winning is set at 12.4%.
I'll rush to his defense....he has made his country and community better by not being a liberal.So not one response to the argument. Usual con response. No response to saying cons don't do that? When I posted direct evidence against it.
I asked what you've done to make the country and your community better. Not a hard question.
Fuzz conveniently forgets about the Rasmussen and PPD polls, which use a similar methodology to the LA Times poll. Fuzz also conveniently forgets that Silver was so wrong about the primaries (a 2% chance for Trump to win? Really?) that he could have been sued for malpractice, if such a cause of action existed against pundits. Finally, Fuzz allegedly conveniently forgets to pay his bets when he loses bets.No, every other poll didn't get it right in 2012.
The LA times poll consistently had Obama ahead by what he won by in the weeks leading up to the election. Using the exact same formula they're using now.
They also have a larger number of people than other polls. They do use the same people, but the same people aren't polled daily.
It doesn't claim to use electoral votes, it's a national poll.
Sounds like a law degree, a few convictions and special prosecutor is your next career in a Donald administration. How can the real lawyers be soooo stoopid?No, b/c there is now proof that FBI agents were offered special jobs in return to help cover it up. The FBI agents used the words quid pro quo in their official report. Not Trump, not me, not right wing conspiracist, but the agents who actually did the investigation. That's not conspiracy.
Oh that's right. FBI agents were on record! Open and shut! The briars know what really happened.Technically others are saying it, but Trump is so much louder it's all you hear.
Do you not think that other FBI agents being pissed that they worked that hard and felt they had enough to indict yet Comey alone disagreed and fed the plan on a long weekend Friday so that the Tuesday back to work the AG could just walk away is just a little suspicious?
No, every other poll didn't get it right in 2012.
The LA times poll consistently had Obama ahead by what he won by in the weeks leading up to the election. Using the exact same formula they're using now.
They also have a larger number of people than other polls. They do use the same people, but the same people aren't polled daily.
It doesn't claim to use electoral votes, it's a national poll.
Sounds like a law degree, a few convictions and special prosecutor is your next career in a Donald administration. How can the real lawyers be soooo stoopid?
From what i understand they use over 2k, with 75% being used daily and 25% being fresh new people.
Try keeping up. Every single lawyer that worked the case agreed with the FBI agents.How can the real lawyers be soooo stoopid?
Ah ha! So you concede that, in fact, that there will be a Donald administration! You walked right into that one, fella!Sounds like a law degree, a few convictions and special prosecutor is your next career in a Donald administration. How can the real lawyers be soooo stoopid?
Try keeping up. Every single lawyer that worked the case agreed with the FBI agents.
“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been verified.
“It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.”
“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official said. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing' which made no sense to us.”
Comey is literally the only person who worked that investigation that felt she shouldn't be indicted.
Shouldn't be surprising after seeing all the hoops he jumped through to clear her. He was given his marching orders & fell in line.
Your runaway winner for Dumbass of the Day? Russell Simmons!
"Russell Simmons joined Trevor Noah on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" on Monday to talk about "Muslims Speak Out," a project he formed to deal with Islamophobia, which he called "the worst scourge we have."
He told Noah that people misunderstand the Muslim community and that "99.99-tenths of them are not radicalized, right?" And then he added the kicker: "Probably more Christians are radicalized."
Of course, nothing of the sort is true, unless you accept the left's definition of radicalization, which says that religious objections to sex outside of the biblical definition of marriage—and perhaps refusing to bake a wedding cake or having the expectation of privacy in the bathroom—is exactly the same thing as throwing homosexuals off buildings and stoning them to death. Simmons apparently thinks saying words that people find objectionable is the same as blowing people up."
These numbers are from 2014, & considering it's the fastest growing religion, the numbers are probably higher today.Your runaway winner for Dumbass of the Day? Russell Simmons!
"Russell Simmons joined Trevor Noah on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" on Monday to talk about "Muslims Speak Out," a project he formed to deal with Islamophobia, which he called "the worst scourge we have."
He told Noah that people misunderstand the Muslim community and that "99.99-tenths of them are not radicalized, right?" And then he added the kicker: "Probably more Christians are radicalized."
Of course, nothing of the sort is true, unless you accept the left's definition of radicalization, which says that religious objections to sex outside of the biblical definition of marriage—and perhaps refusing to bake a wedding cake or having the expectation of privacy in the bathroom—is exactly the same thing as throwing homosexuals off buildings and stoning them to death. Simmons apparently thinks saying words that people find objectionable is the same as blowing people up."
Willy would still hit it.
All that being said, I'm glad that the election is not tomorrow. She would NOT win Ohio, but there's a hell of a chance that she would win the whole thing, if the election was tomorrow. But the word is that the really good stuff from Wiki and O'Keefe is yet to come.
These asshole libs
How presidential of her! And she has the nerve to call me a deplorable. SMDH.
Honestly, the left is filled with brainwashed sheep who refuse to step out of bounds in their indoctrination.
You're right...The Right has clearly stepped out of bounds and selected a liberal, swindling, jack-off from NYC as their nominee.
It was apparent to you that "Remain" was going to defeat "Leave". How did that turn out?LOL...you're starting to become unhinged. It's clearly staring to become apparent to even you, Hillary is going to win the election.
So nothing. Got it.I'll rush to his defense....he has made his country and community better by not being a liberal.
Having people getting paid to act like asses at a rally is voter fraud?
That's the entire video. The DNC pays people to go to rallies and get urrbody all riled up.
Sounds like good gamesmanship, to me. Surprise. Politics is dirty.
I believe I read 3000, but I may be mistaken.
A lot of truth to that. Some of the most positive and happy people I know are some of the dumbest as well. By dumb, they have no clue what is going on outside of their small little bubble. They do not keep up with the news, do not get on Social Media, etc. They live rather simple lives. When I sit back and think about it I wish I had their attitude about life. Would be much easier not giving a damn about most things and just live life to its fullest.I know what the election taught me. Evidence varies.
In a murder case, emails and text message are used to convict murders.
In a hillary clinton case, emails and video evidence "don't count" or it's "untrue"
What a world we live in. The whole human experience is one big sham. You people lie to yourselves just to get through the day. You're trying to make sense of a world artificially constructed and you think your participation matters.I'd give both of my arms and legs just to stroll through life naive and clueless. Ignorance is truly bliss.