Now a 3 seed by Joe Lunardi
- Thread starter moses1uk
- Start date
Yeah, we should be a 3-seed right now. The resume is undeniable, as is the "eye test" that these talking heads usually talk about when attempting to justify seeding.
Guys get Catfight to get his anal lube ready. I’d be shocked if we get what we deserve.
Remember, as we say a lot, those silly losses matter when seeding is done. LSU was unfortunate, that team blows. UK would be the hottest team without that loss.
Really want that and the Florida losses back, though. Totally blew both.
Really want that and the Florida losses back, though. Totally blew both.
So Duke essentially doesn't drop at all, as they finish a lackluster ACC season where they beat not one ranked team.
Idk, I'd swap us with them. We had a harder last three weeks than they had all of 2024.
I got to think this was before the Duke loss
Actually he noted Duke would fall to 3 line but Iowa State (who lost) would move up
If you look at UK’s past years and bracket reveals, take what you think we will get and add 2 and that is where we will be. I’m thinking 3 so we are probably the top 5 seed in the bracket reveal.
Duke just has to win doesn’t matter if it’s against good teams lol they always get over seeded
It’s insane how bad Duke’s actual resume is and how much it isn’t being held against them?!!! The ACC was a disaster this year and they had exactly one notable non-con win against Baylor. They should be a 4-5 seed at best if the bias is removed.
Baylor and duke should both be behind us now
I would love Duke in our region
How are we the lowest 3 seed after that and with our resume?
That said, hope Duke can stay a 2 seed somehow and be the 2 seed to our 3 seed- that would be a DREAM.
That said, hope Duke can stay a 2 seed somehow and be the 2 seed to our 3 seed- that would be a DREAM.
But those goof balls on tv this afternoon had the cats at a 5 seed, where did that come from??
I agree. And this is still influx on the seeding. I was just thinking that same thing, since they didn’t beat unc-chapel hill branch, then their best win is Baylor back in December. You and I are looking at it the more common sense way (ie ranked team comment) but they throw out all that Quad crap-Quad 1, Quad 2, Quad 65, Mod Quad etc. I’ve watched this sport for too many years I don’t study that mess. ACC stinks this year!
What worries me about Palm having us so low is he works for CBS. I’m hoping he isn’t getting fed insider info from the committee to make him and CBS look good. Because if we are a 5 in the bracket reveal, it’s going to be criminal.
He's obviously suffered some kind of head trauma.
How in the holy hell is Duke a 2 seed…. Man they must have some Dukies inside the committee too!!!
This stuff tends to work itself out in the end.
Win a couple of games in the SEC we are looking at a 3 most likely. Possibly 2.
Lose first game and probably a 4 or 5.
I don't see any other senario.
Win a couple of games in the SEC we are looking at a 3 most likely. Possibly 2.
Lose first game and probably a 4 or 5.
I don't see any other senario.
Palm is ranked 142nd out of 174 on bracket matrix. He absolutely sucks at predicting the brackets. It’s legit factual at this point. Look for yourself.
This was before the end of the Duke game.
Neither is Lunardi and people take his as gospel lol.
Honestly people just look at the average on bracket matrix and that's probably most accurate lol
I think with UNC winning @ Duke, they should probably have the 1 seed.
Kansas gets a Big12 bump. They benefit from having a bunch of Q1 wins in large part because they have a bunch of opportunities for those type of wins by playing in that conference.
That being said, Kenpom has UK 17th and KU as 18th........the same one spot behind us. So maybe it's a bit accurate to say the two teams should be seeded similariy
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
