McGregor has better odds of winning the fight then the Browns do of beating the Steelers Week 1...
Yup. Friend of friend. He managed to work in a long dialogue of his own style, in depth analysis of Connor, how great the sport is, Connors ability to generate power in short distances and akward angles.
Be on the look out for a quick left hook to end this thing he says.
Friday Night Tykes
YWIA
If this goes longer than 7 rounds, Mayweather is either toying with McGregor or it's fixed. Given the nature of fighting sports, I have money on fixed
If this was a street fight Connor destroys him.
Now the night of the fight, you may
fell a slight sting, that's pride
f***in' wit ya. F*** pride! Pride
only hurts, it never helps. Fight
through that s**t. 'Cause a year
from now, when you're kickin' it in
the Caribbean you're gonna say,
"Marsellus Wallace was right."
I assume we will see McGregor's entourage leading him to the ring with a dead rabbit on a stick.
Sounds like it!!Pulp has been on IFC a lot lately. I watched it every day my last semester of college. Used 2 VCR's to edit it in chronological time format. Man, that last semester of college was probably the best 5 month period of my life.
Feel like it made that turn awhile ago.The "Larry Vaught likes the ladies" deal has turned from a cute GYERO inside joke to kinda concerning?
Hopefully he's a not the type of guy whom is driven nuts by people saying, "chomping at the bit," instead of the correct word, "champing." I bet he's not. Otherwise his life would surely be miserable.chomping at the bit
Feel like it made that turn awhile ago.
Hopefully he's a not the type of guy whom is driven nuts by people saying, "chomping at the bit," instead of the correct word, "champing." I bet he's not. Otherwise his life would surely be miserable.
Hopefully he's a not the type of guy whom is driven nuts by people saying, "chomping at the bit," instead of the correct word, "champing." I bet he's not. Otherwise his life would surely be miserable.
Knock it off, the both of you.Pretty sure "whom" should be "who" in this context.