Age may not grant you slack on being an asshole, but it certainly does matter in this case. It is a factor in calculating the unreasonable force used and the extremely poor decision to use it.Age doesn't have shit to do with it. You don't physically or verbally attack a customer, regardless if they're 77 or 27. Same for the customer. Your age doesn't give you a pass to be an asshole to store employees. What should have happened here was the manager asking him to leave, and if he refused, call 911 and have him removed and banned from ever coming back.
Instead, we have a guy who paid with his life for being an asshole, and a guy who has turned his own (and others) life upside down for not keeping his cool. Neither should have happened.
A 77 y/o man on average can't handle trauma as well as a younger person. The severity of a blow is magnified against the elderly thus increasing the amount of unreasonable force and the resulting outcome. The age of the 27 y/o attacker is also a factor considering youth allows him to deliver a more lethal punch.
I would expect age would be an important consideration in the court case, but I won't be surprised if race is made more important. Especially by a leftist judge who weighs the use of certain words the same or close to physical violence, which is complete regressive bullshit.
With the crazed focus on exacerbating divisive racial tensions, I'm afraid this kind of nonsense is only going to get worse. And nothing positive, helpful, or constructive is going to come from it.