Btw I wonder if they just do a normal AEW title match at All Out or a winner take all deal where Kenny would get the impact titles back? Would have thought impact would want their guys to win the title off Omega and not Cage.
Zcat 2 years from now:Zcat 2 years ago - Christian was always overrated Edge carried that team- Edge multi world champ and great draw
Zcat yesterday - Christian was underrated- wwe didn’t use him right - 5 star match with omega
Definitely. Last was in March of 83. He teamed with Stagger Lee (Koko Ware) to face Jimmy hart, Bobby Eaton, pork chop Cash and Mad Dog Boyd.Did Andre ever wrestle in Louisville? I can't remember ever seeing him.
OK. With as often as I was there on Tuesday nights back then that I would have missed him. I don't think I would forget seeing him. Thanks.Definitely. Last was in March of 83. He teamed with Stagger Lee (Koko Ware) to face Jimmy hart, Bobby Eaton, pork chop Cash and Mad Dog Boyd.
The previous night, Lawler was teaming with the good guys in Memphis. Here’s footage
Andre in Memphis
(and I’d course, he did in the WWF. They had a marathon Tv taping in summer of 88 where he faced Savage in the main event which ended in a cheap count out when Elizabeth got “hurt” and Savage carried her to the back)
fans weren’t happy to see a cheap main event after a boring TV taping
I started going in August of 82. I saw that place overflowing (and they always had good crowds), but like people sitting in the aisles: Andre’s appearance, Lawler vs Dundee’s June 7, 1983 loser leaves town and the road Warriors facing the FabsOK. With as often as I was there on Tuesday nights back then that I would have missed him. I don't think I would forget seeing him. Thanks.
I think del rio and sin cara did this and like you said since the event was in Mexico it wasn’t worth pursuing - or some lawyer combed through the non-compete and probably wasn’t explicitly stated so had no grounds to prevent itFlair's appearance in AAA = Violation of his non-compete?
I think this was discussed with Alberto del Rio and other wrestlers who were competing in AAA before their 90-day non-compete had expired. My understanding was that it was a violation, but that they were out of U.S. jurisdiction when in Mexico and it wasn't worth pursuing. But those were people who were expected to stay in Mexico and compete. I don't expect Ric Flair to stick around in Mexico, he's going to come back home and find work in an American fed. So, unless he received a waiver from WWE, isn't it a violation of his non-compete clause?
It got over big in Mid South, so Jarrett stole, er, recycled it (lol)Why did Koko and Dog both wrestle under the name Stagger Lee?
I did a little research and found that ADR had filed suit in Mexico to have the non-compete clause ruled unconstitutional prior to performing, and was successful, and I assume that all other wrestlers subsequently performing in AAA before their non-compete period expired have relied on that court ruling as precedent to compete in Mexico.I think del rio and sin cara did this and like you said since the event was in Mexico it wasn’t worth pursuing - or some lawyer combed through the non-compete and probably wasn’t explicitly stated so had no grounds to prevent it
How does a Mexican court have control of a contract signed in another country?I did a little research and found that ADR had filed suit in Mexico to have the non-compete clause ruled unconstitutional prior to performing, and was successful, and I assume that all other wrestlers subsequently performing in AAA before their non-compete period expired have relied on that court ruling as precedent to compete in Mexico.
A Mexican court certainly has jurisdiction over whether a non-compete clause in a contract can be enforced in Mexico...and particularly whether the enforcement violates the Mexican constitution.How does a Mexican court have control of a contract signed in another country?
I don't know anything about the law but I would think a contract signed in the US would be likely be litigated in the US if broken making anything any other country said completely irrelevant. That would seem logical at least.A Mexican court certainly has jurisdiction over whether a non-compete clause in a contract can be enforced in Mexico...and particularly whether the enforcement violates the Mexican constitution.
Well, I do know something about the law, and you're wrong. Very often the situs of the contract, i.e. the location where the contract is performed, is the basis for jurisdiction of a court to decide a contract dispute.I don't know anything about the law but I would think a contract signed in the US would be likely be litigated in the US if broken making anything any other country said completely irrelevant. That would seem logical at least.
This is similar to cruise ships and where they are in the water - as soon as you set sail you are in international waters and thus the duty free shops open up which aren’t subject to the United States taxes and feesWell, I do know something about the law, and you're wrong. Very often the situs of the contract, i.e. the location where the contract is performed, is the basis for jurisdiction of a court to decide a contract dispute.
Are you saying that if I signed a contract in another country to be an indentured servant, that that contract could be enforced in the U.S.?
WhoaCharlotte was at the AAA event last night instead of at the WWE House show.
Sure it was okayed by WWE but still.
And was left on the card, so fans expected to see her. Wonder how that went.Charlotte was at the AAA event last night instead of at the WWE House show.
Sure it was okayed by WWE but still.