I don't care how you cut it, getting a point at Azteca in this cycle is a major plus; anything less than four points would have been a setback, and the US did what they had to last night and against T&D.
My one biggest surprise and takeaway was the rationale behind Guzan; I can be sold on pretty much any personnel decision by a coach, but Guzan against Mexico at Azteca would have been one I'd have lost serious money on if it was part of a wager. Arriola and Gonzalez make sense due to playing in LigaMX. Beasley does also (although the same rationale could be applied to Villafana). But Guzan was a headscratcher.
A. Villafana was hurt. That is why beasley started.
B. The reasoning on starting guzan was interesting. After the match Arena said that they were concerned with the # of kickoffs they thought he would have to take and he questioned whether or not Howard's previous injury would hold up with only 2 days rest and playing at altitude. They supposedly made the decision on Howard on the first day of camp. He told both keepers when they would play.