Again, I’d like to hear specifically why was he afraid to touch it and what impact that was having. What was the risk vs reward debate about?
Example: Brown had UT players telling him to come to UT. Got it. But also tell me: was he listening, what was UTs offer, what is he making at UK, what could UK do differently, etc.
I’m open minded to anything or anyone being right or wrong but Id like more specifics. To date it’s been mostly strong language parroted by others who have old biases already like it’s politics.
We will never better understand the intricacies of NIL if instead we just argue about the legitimacy of MB and MJ repeatedly. From the very beginning this effort required more pragmatists and less ideologues to get the most benefit to UK Athletics.