No doubt the rivalry would benefit IU. UK seems to be doing just fine without IU. Your definition of a good rivalry is different than most who follow UK. The hostility at a personal level and attemps to insult and degrade anyone from Kentucky is something we prefer to do without. UK seems to be producing their fair share of AA and NBA players just fine. UK has won 3 NCs since IU so pardon me if I find your arguments purely emotional and lacking.Yes I said a good rivalry between uk and IU would help bring in recruits and or keep them in the same way unc and Duke does. I personally think the uk tradition and IU tradition is superior to that of unc and Duke. Yes uk has done more than there fair share of the load for being who uk is, arguably the best program in college bball. IU and uk is bigger nationally than uk and uofl.
Would beating you guys 2 of last 3 be viewed as relevant? Or beating two number one seeds in same year.
Winning two big ten ch in 4 years?
Being that you graduated with a business degree, you should be able to understand value in something, and if you can't or don't want to see the value in a good rivalry between two schools that possess 13 national championships between them and countless all Americans and NBA players. Then yes you are in fact dumb, dumb because you clearly didn't learn anything at The Kelly School of Buisness at Indiana university.
I am done with this. Good luck with Archie. I think he will actually fix a lot of IUs issues. Next time you come to another's board try not to be so insulting out of the gate.
BTW, I only mentioned my degree as you called me uneducated. Just loved the irony of letting you know I am a Kelly grad.