To me it goes by a case by case basis and I think Dakari made a mistake because I don't think he had hit his ceiling in college. I look at it like this...just because you are projected as a 1st round pick does not necessarily mean that its a wise choice to declare. Doesn't mean that its not either. For me, it comes down to the business decision of can you improve your stock and make MUCH MORE money? I think the answer for Dakari is yes. The twins, I would say no. As for Dakari, he will likely be drafted by a very good team (if 1st rounder) who will most likely have a good player or players in front of him and will spend a lot of time in the D-League to either develope or to just wait until he is traded, which was possibly the teams reason for drafting him to begin with. Now, if he comes back I think he greatly improves as a player next year with more minutes and not on Cal's shortest of short leashes next year. I'm sure it was difficult for him to be yanked out at the very smallest mistake. But that's just how our team was this year. But anyway, he comes back and improves and thus improves his draft stock into the lottery at least and IMO a top 10 draft spot. Now, that seems like alot better decision to me than possibly falling into the 2nd round without a guaranteed contract and without a team all together. I just think this was a bad business decision for him to declare this year. Its definitely a risk to return but everything is when you're talking money. Its just like any other money decision, you weigh out the pros and con's and make a smart decision based off that but the reward for a return is worth the risk for Dakari, IMHO. I hope I'm wrong but we will see. I really don't like the idea of just because you're "projected" as a 1st rounder then that means you go for sure. It should be on a case by case basis to make a smart decision for the player.