Making it harder for kids to damage themselves with porn makes a difference. It made pornhub block Kentucky. Kentucky didn't block pornhub.
I think it's telling that they blocked KY rather than make it harder for young people to access their site illegally. Just as telling as sites like Fb and the US gov not really going after porn and abuse on social media and elsewhere, while targeting posts about "patriotism" and religious morality or even Bible quotes. I just use it less. They make less money as a result.
I don't see it as gov overreach to try to keep people who already aren't legally able to buy something from accessing it. Enforcing existing rules is the job of govt.
Pornhub blocking Kentucky is pornhub deciding to lose money, right? Wgaf? It's like Disney deciding to double down on trashing the Star Wars franchise. Money saved. Lives unaffected. (THE difference is that fewer kids will commit suicide, fewer people will abuse and be abused, and fewer people will be damaged the longer these businesses ban Kentuckians access. Three cheers for the stupidity of executives at this company.)