Years from now it will be some other retired or "former" dude claiming the same thing while producing nothing. Same old story every time.
It's because: There are no crashed UFOs.
The story changed, significantly, this time.
No prior disclosure involved hours of testimony is secured fashion, under oath, with penalties of perjury applied, before multiple committees of Congress.
“While producing nothing . . . .” This is a media pushed and accepted misreading of David Grusch’s testimony, which came in two parts:
(1) Hours of testimony in front of a Senate committee with high security clearance. Senators have acknowledged that Grusch produced (classified) documentary proof, none having been released (as of yet), along with names, dates, locations.
(2) A relatively brief “hearing” in front of a relatively minor House Sub-Committee with no security clearances, which lacked the production of the still-classified proof Grusch legally produced to a Senate committee with legal security clearances.
This dichotomy has produced a bias in favor of the most recent, less revealing testimony, and a complete blind spot for
what is really going on.
The issue is not whether Grusch can produce proof of what he alleges.
He did so over 11 hours of testimony to the Senate Committee, as admitted by Senators who heard it, though nary a (specific) word of that testimony can be released, legally. The issue, rather, is whether the Senate and House will pass legislation to allow the release of the classified details that some mistakenly assume do not exist.
And from all reports, a battle-royal is underway!
Senator Shumer has made his stance clear: he wants to release the details, allowing Americans direct knowledge of “non-human intelligence.” Those were his words.
And the young Turks in the House are bolting, hard against the resistance being applied by the MIC.
Who wins?
My best guess is that there will be a compromise allowing a tad bit more public current disclosure, combined with mechanisms allowing timed/delayed disclosures in the future.
There is an inherent fear/apprehension openly addressed in this thread that “we can’t handle the truth.”
And that fear is not entirely unfounded.
But we might better handle the truth if it comes in pieces and parts scattered over a couple of decades.