I specifically mentioned this in the earlier UNC thread from a few days ago.
I think this is the most overlooked aspect of the UNC case of late.
At the time this affidavit from Crowder came out, it was literally days away from UNC having to finally respond to the ANOA. And this gave UNC yet another delay in the case, something UNC has already used in the past with their last-minute "additional findings" stunt.
I questioned at the time the motivations of Crowder to go years in silence only to come forward now. And its not like she did so with a simple statement, instead she arrives with an affidavit with a high-priced lawyer. It was clearly a stunt at the behest of, and likely funded by, UNC.
And if anyone doubted the true intent, "her" lawyer soon starts leaking statements about Sankey and the NCAA and their authority to rule in the UNC case.
This has little to nothing to do with Deborah Crowder and her "desire" to defend the legitimacy of the "classes" she ran and everything to do with pushing UNC's narrative trying to derail the current ANOA by any means necessary. There's no doubt who Crowder's lawyer is actually working for. Kind of disappointed no one in the national press seems to have recognized this.